Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Community » The Flameboard » Tora Z's Christian Rant, Part II (Page 1)

  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: Tora Z's Christian Rant, Part II
Charles Capps
We appreciate your concern.
It is noted and stupid.
Member # 9

 - posted      Profile for Charles Capps     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
'Twas getting a bit long...
http://solareclipse.net/Forums/Forum4/HTML/000067.html

------------------
"Okay, so I'm not "SANE" so to speak, but uh... I'm the lovable kind of psycho"
http://solareclipse.net/


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Charles Capps
We appreciate your concern.
It is noted and stupid.
Member # 9

 - posted      Profile for Charles Capps     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Oh, and Frank, you REALLY could have worded your last reply a bit better...

------------------
"Okay, so I'm not "SANE" so to speak, but uh... I'm the lovable kind of psycho"
http://solareclipse.net/


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Dani
Naboo Handmaiden
Ex-Part-Time Admin
Member # 57

 - posted      Profile for Dani     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'll agree with that one, Charles...
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Sol System
two dollar pistol
Member # 30

 - posted      Profile for Sol System     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Er...Frank's post was merely a few facts strung together.

------------------
"And though I once prefered a human being's company, they pale before the monolith that towers over me."
--
They Might Be Giants


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Diane
aka Tora Ziyal
Member # 53

 - posted      Profile for Diane     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'm rather tired, but I suppose I should state my opinions before this gets further.

The reason I posted this is because I'm sick of hearing Christians at church talk about the evils of homosexuality. The Catholic Christians at my school, on the other hand, are quite supportive of homosexuals. I don't know if it's true of all Catholics, but it's true of the ones I know. I wish I have the courage to stand up for homosexuals, but I don't. And I can guess that if I had done it, the moment I say it and storm out of the room, the lot of them'll say I'm misled by Satan and start praying for me.

My second point is less about my stand on Evolution vs. Creation than about what my church says about it. I do believe that God created through Evolution, and that the Creation described in Genesis is a metaphor of it because people back then didn't have enough knowledge to understand. However, my church believes in a literal translation of Creation. My youth pastor even claims that "there is no real evidence of Evolution". I was shocked when I first heard that. My assistant youth pastor claims that he has enough evidence to convince anyone that Creation was the truth. That's all nice and well, except that he didn't bother to explain to the rest of us what they were.

At this point I thought I should mention that I was raised in Taiwan under the assumption that Evolution was scientific truth, and that was it. Only 2% of all Taiwanese are Christian (Buddhists are majority), and my family wasn't religious at all except that my mom had gone to Catholic church when she was younger, and my dad got church food donations for the poor when he was a kid.I was baptized as a Catholic two years after I entered a Catholic elementary school in Los Angeles, and we moved to a non-divisional Christian church (the one I'm at now)two years after that because the Catholic church didn't meet our needs. The reason I mention this is because I had never regarded Creation as anything more serious than a myth, and this is why.

I always thought we had left the belief in Creation behind a century or two ago, that's why I was so shocked. I still don't understand how people deny Evolution.

By the way, about the meaning of "7 days": the definition of a "day" is one rotation of the Earth on its axis. Even Christians have to admit that. If it means anything else on the Bible, maybe translators shouldn't use that word.

------------------
"I have come to the conclusion that one man is called a disgrace, that two are called a law firm, and that three on the law become a congress! And by God I have had this Congress!"
--John Adams, "1776"


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Aethelwer
Frank G
Member # 36

 - posted      Profile for Aethelwer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Sol is correct. Feel free to argue, but the statements back themselves up. I did write it late at night, though, so if there's anything I should reword, let me know.

------------------
http://frankg.dgne.com/
Megatron: "Waspinator, salvage Inferno."
Waspinator: "Inferno blow up, Waspinator must salvage. Waspinator blow up, nobody salvage. Why universe hate Waspinator?"


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Jeff Raven
Always Right
Member # 20

 - posted      Profile for Jeff Raven     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Tora: Which is exactly why I think the Bible is a metaphoric description of how things went.

On proving Creation, I have seen tons of psuedo-scientific Creationist crap from many sources. And, I could systematically disprove those claims(as I have before with my creationist schoolmates).

There's even an institution for 'proving' creation and 'disproving' evolution. But, I have read much of their literature, and what they use is not science. Science is taking facts, generating a hypothesis based on those facts that might fit with other models, and then finding other models to test the hypothesis.
They do it backwards. They already have the hypothesis, so they just go out and look for the facts to support it. This is wrong, because they can ignore or deny other facts that might contradict their 'hypothesis'. I'd like to see someone try to 'disprove' evolution.

------------------
Jeff Raven - Having more fun than any human being should be allowed to have


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Chimaera
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I am a firm believer in evolution, but rather than go on and on about it, I thought I'd post some interesting reading:

How did we get here?

Is a debate for and against evolution/creation, I haven't read all of it, but it consists of letters of 500 words or less from 2 people, one for and one against, so its a balanced viewpoint.

What are they thinking?

Is a Scientific American online article, discussing how nearly half of Americans do not believe in evolution, and why they don't.

As for me, one of the reasons I do not believe in god (technically I supposse I'm agnostic) is that as our understanding of the universe grows, the "realm" of God is quickly shrinking. What do I mean by this? Well, something one doesn't understand can be thought of as an act of God. Genesis was written, for example, when people didn't know how or why they came to be. But as our knowledge of the universe grows, we can now begin to explain it without reference to a supreme being (note I say here "begin", since there will always be that which cannot be explained, one can ascribe this to God, I, on the other hand, believe that it will eventually be explained/discovered later). This explains the "how", but not the "why". For me personally, there is no "why", your life is what you make of it, if you want a purpose, give yourself one. A lot of people may find this a quite unsatisfying explanation, which is fine, it just happens to satisfy me and my view of the world. And so evolution does a good job of explaining how life came to be, and how humanity came to be. For those who believe that there should be a "why", evolution probably seems quite unsatisfying. To me, this difference of view really doesn't justify the petty sniping that goes back and forth on this subject from time to time in debates I have seen elsewhere.

One cannot generalize an entire group based on a minority. One cannot reject Christianity because of of a minority within it who are intolerant no more than one can reject science because of the atomic bomb or reject Germany because of Nazism. There is a lot that is commendable about Christianity, as has been said by others, and I believe this partly since I live in a society which inherited many of its morals or views from Christianity.

To tell someone that they are going to hell if they don't believe in a supreme being reflects back to the days when citizens were ruled through fear (and if the person doesn't believe in hell, the argument doesn't do well anyway). I don't take being ruled by threat or fear well or seriously.

As for homosexuality, the precise cause is still unkown, so perhaps it is possible for some people to change. One of the greatest mysteries yet to be solved is the functioning of the human brain, and this may very well be part of this mystery. If the cause of homosexuality is indeed biochemical within the brain (and not genetic), things like prayer (or meditation) could very well have an effect. It could be genetic AND biochemical, which makes it exceedingly complex and could mean that some people could change and others could not. I have no doubt that this may not be worked out for many years to come.

This concludes my rambling for today


------------------
"Sometimes you get the bear, and sometimes the bear gets you."
-Commander Riker, USS Enterprise


[This message was edited by Chimaera on April 13, 1999.]

[This message was edited by Chimaera on April 13, 1999.]


IP: Logged
bryce
Anointed Class of 2003
Member # 42

 - posted      Profile for bryce     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Oh, for those who want to know, I'm still here! I just have decided to no longer comment in this thread.

------------------
Wheeelersburg Correctional Facility
Inmate #05301999


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
First of Two
Better than you
Member # 16

 - posted      Profile for First of Two     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
No intelligent being designed our eyeballs. If one had, they would not be so inefficient. The image they project is upside down, so that a complex mechanism has to exist to restore them. The rods and cones are poorly placed. The optic nerve is connected in such a way that blind spots are created. Our vision is not as sharp as many animals, cannot se at night as well as many animals, and does not cover the spectrum that many animals can see in. Many of us are colorblind, to various degrees, a defect encoded in our genetic structure.

Moreso, we have other parts which provide hard-to-define benefits, but can kill us when they are damaged, yet we can suffer their removal with no apparent ill effects (our appendixes).

This is not evidence that we were designed by someone who knew what he/she was doing.

Intelligent Ignition? Maybe. I could accept that, possibly, eons ago, an intelligent being wrote the physical laws which hold sway in the Universe, (thermodynamics, c=186,000mps, and so forth) and set the thing in motion so that it would follow those laws, which MAY have been written to make the evolution of life likely. Then again, maybe the Universe HAD to exist that way, we can't say.

Intelligent Design? (an infallible being designed and created human life in a semi-or-totally Biblical sense?) Ha-ha-ha-ha! No.

Intelligent Interference? ( an omnibenevolent, omnipotent, omnipresent being is watching our every move and wants to help us?) Surely not. At least, not in MY life experience.

------------------
*I only SEEM Normal*


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
PsyLiam
Hungry for you
Member # 73

 - posted      Profile for PsyLiam     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
To be fair First, you have food, are not suffering from some completley debilatating disease. You can speak. You have a good education. You are intelligent. You could argue that without God maybe you'd be starving, suffering from MS. Maybe without God Milosovitch would have succeeded in his extermination campaign. Without God maybe Hitler would have conquered the world. Without God maybe humanity would have been killed by wild animals before it ever got off the ground.

The problem with someone who works subtely, invisibly, is that you don't know if he's changed anything, or what they used to be like before.

Besides, whose to say this is our final evolution process. God created physical laws for the universe, so presumably he plays by them otherwise what would be the point? Maybe he does have a final design plan for humanity, it's just gonna take a million years to goet there.

And Frank was right. Pretty much the main aim of nearly every species on this planet is to reproduce. Homosexuality IS counterproductive to that, as is sterility. You could argue that both are physical conditions that are not productive to the species as a whole.

Not arguing anything there, just stating something okay?

------------------
'Saying it in a stacato voice doesn't make it any more true'
-Stewart Lee


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
First of Two
Better than you
Member # 16

 - posted      Profile for First of Two     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Psyliam: Good points,at least on the surface.

Really, it's impossible to make a determination of effect by a "Subtle Being" you suppose. True, you could argue that all those things might have happened differently. Conversely, you could argue that had I never been allowed to watch my closest friend die slowly and in great pain, I might have entered the ministry (at the time, it was a distinct possibility), or that if not for my current gf's mother's ferverent religious beliefs, she might not have been sexually abused as a child, and if not for her pastor's strict adherence to church law, something might have been done about it. But "What if's" are worthless.

On the gripping hand, you are supposing a rather reactionary form of God.

Consider.. a subtle being, not wanting its effects to be seen, and yet all-powerful and all-knowing, could have seen to it that Hitler was stillborn.. or never conceived in the first place. Simple manipulation of sperm or egg. Same with Milosevich. If you imagine God as the Subtle Spirit, you have to assume that what HAS happened has happened because it was SUPPOSED to, because it WANTED Hitler, Milo, and the rest.

This is, at best, difficult to come to terms with. It would mean that we somehow NEEDED Hitler, STalin, Torquemada, and the rest, to somehow "better" us. I find that impossible to accept.

I agree that Frank is right. As far as propagating the specied goes, homosexuality is a dead end. That doesn't make it evil, though.

Not offended, just responding.

------------------
*I only SEEM Normal*


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
bryce
Anointed Class of 2003
Member # 42

 - posted      Profile for bryce     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
If First would like I will respond to his post about eyes and such.

------------------
Anyone remember how they felt the day after Rich Mullins died?



Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Saltah'na
Chinese Canadian, or 75% Commie Bastard.
Member # 33

 - posted      Profile for Saltah'na     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
On the topic of Evolution, anyone read "Inherit the Wind"?

I now quote one of my favourite lines it that book:

"The Bible is a book, a great book. But it is not the only book".

------------------
I can resist anything.......
Except Temptation


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
First of Two
Better than you
Member # 16

 - posted      Profile for First of Two     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
bryce, if you feel you can provide some insight, go ahead.

------------------
*I only SEEM Normal*


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3