Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Community » The Flameboard » Kyoto: Myth or Science?

   
Author Topic: Kyoto: Myth or Science?
Saltah'na
Chinese Canadian, or 75% Commie Bastard.
Member # 33

 - posted      Profile for Saltah'na     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
http://www.nationalpost.com/search/site/story.asp?id=A1EAB9EF-BC6E-46CE-B02D-29EEE60D9474

An interesting thing: the National Post is traditionally a right-wing Newspaper. Normally it does not support Kyoto, but the above article makes it a bit perplexing.

--------------------
"And slowly, you come to realize, it's all as it should be, you can only do so much. If you're game enough, you could place your trust in me. For the love of life, there's a tradeoff, we could lose it all but we'll go down fighting...." - David Sylvian
FreeSpace 2, the greatest space sim of all time, now remastered!

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Shik
Starship database: completed; History of Starfleet: done; website: probably never
Member # 343

 - posted      Profile for Shik     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Oh, Kyoto exists. I know people who've been there. ARE there, actually.

--------------------
"The French have a saying: 'mise en place'—keep everything in its fucking place!"

Registered: Jun 2000  |  IP: Logged
Da_bang80
A few sectors short of an Empire
Member # 528

 - posted      Profile for Da_bang80     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I live in saskatchewan, so we don't really worry about pollution, cause were like 45% farmland and 50% forest, and the last 5% is towns, cities, lakes, and any thing else. Anyways, They're really against the Kyoto Accord in Alberta because they think it will hurt thier oil industry.

Personally I really don't care about it. If some politician thinks we need to cut back on polluting, then good for him. I respect the environment, and I don't really need some idiot in a suit to tell me that I'm hurting the planet.

--------------------
Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change.
The courage to change the things I cannot accept.
And the wisdom to hide the bodies of all the people I had to kill today because they pissed me off.

Remember when your parents told you it's dangerous to play in traffic?

Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged
The_Tom
recently silent
Member # 38

 - posted      Profile for The_Tom     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Not 50%! Slightly less!

--------------------
"I was surprised by the matter-of-factness of Kafka's narration, and the subtle humor present as a result." (Sizer 2005)

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Da_bang80
A few sectors short of an Empire
Member # 528

 - posted      Profile for Da_bang80     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hah! I didn't even think Saskatchewan had anything on the internet. Fine then. Slightly less than 50%. I was just geuss-timating anyways. Who here thinks they need some stiff-ass politician to tell them that global warming is bad? It's sad really how those damn government tight-asses think we're all a bunch of ignorant morons. Well, some of us are ignorant morons, my friend comes to mind (no names)... But that's besides the point. I care about the environment too, but if the world warms up a few degrees i'm not one to complain. It's too damn freezing here anyways... [Smile]

--------------------
Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change.
The courage to change the things I cannot accept.
And the wisdom to hide the bodies of all the people I had to kill today because they pissed me off.

Remember when your parents told you it's dangerous to play in traffic?

Registered: Feb 2001  |  IP: Logged
capped
I WAS IN THE FUTURE, IT WAS TOO LATE TO RSVP
Member # 709

 - posted      Profile for capped     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
the gist of what ive heard is that the wierd incentives are being made to convince countries to up their forests ability to produce O2 in order to reduce CO2.. but now evidence is that new growth forests operate on an O2 deficit..

basically, we'd be better off if we hadnt deforested in the first place. which everyone should realize anyway.

the accords shouldnt be thrown out on this fact though, the end result will still be improvement of the envrionment, itll just take longer than we thought for it to take effect, to give the new growth forests time to do what we intend them too.

--------------------
"Are you worried that your thoughts are not quite.. clear?"

Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3