Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » subspace-wapons

   
Author Topic: subspace-wapons
Amasov Prime
lensfare-induced epileptic shock
Member # 742

 - posted      Profile for Amasov Prime     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
According to the description of a quantum torpedo in the DS9TM, is such a torpedo a "subspace wapon"? I'm referring to the line about the second Khitomer-accords in "Insurrection". They said subspace weapons are illegal now. Could this be a reason we didn't see a quantum torpedo after FC, for example in Nemesis and Insurrection? (OTPH, the Defiant obviously kept on carrying them throughout the show's run, but maybe that paragraph of the treaty was not 'in use' during the joint klingon/federal operations of the Dominion War.)

Furthermore, wasn't the treaty of Khitomer some sort of peace treaty between the Klingon Empire and the UFP? If that's the case, why sould the Son'a care for it? Even if the Romulans and other empires signed the original treaty in TUC and these races agreed to sign the second one from DS9, too; why should the Son'a do so? There's no reason to assume a minor non-alligned race like the Son'a has anything to do with a Klingon/UFP-treaty.

--------------------
"This is great. Usually it's just cardboard walls in a garage."

Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Sol System
two dollar pistol
Member # 30

 - posted      Profile for Sol System     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well, an obvious difference between the first treaty from Khitomer and the second one seems to leap out at me. Hint: They are different.

Anyway, what constitutes a "subspace wapon"? For one thing, if I recall correctly, the Son'a were using iso-something or other subspace weaponry, and who knows what kind of difference that makes.

For another, we know that your average phaser has a subspace component, what with all that talk about "transitioning from the continuum" and the like. But obviously phasers and phaser-like weapons don't have secondary effects that are considered dangerous. The Son'a weapon, on the other hand, actually tore open a hole in the universe. This seems to place it in a different realm, and certainly warrants some caution in its use, I would think.

To sum up, it seems to me that the difference is that the Son'a weapon was twisting up space directly, while something like a phaser or quantum torpedo is only drawing power from or shunting matter to a different realm.

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
MinutiaeMan
Living the Geeky Dream
Member # 444

 - posted      Profile for MinutiaeMan     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
In the realm of international diplomacy, some major "accords" can be a group of treaties, rather than one single document. Also, some treaties can be "acceded to" by other nations after it's signed -- which basically means that the other nations announce they'll follow the rules of that treaty, after the fact.

A couple of years ago I wrote up a fictional version of the Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production, and Stockpiling of Subspace Weapons, which is basically a real United Nations treaty (on biological or chemical weapons, IIRC) which I changed around to use references to the appropriate technologies and interstellar contact.

I think the key difference between the weapons that the Son'a used and the quantum torpedoes is that the Q-torps are rather limited in their scope (how they interact with subspace), while the very purpose of the Son'a weapons was to create an unstable rift which would (hopefully) destroy the enemy ship. And that's why those weapons were banned.

--------------------
“Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.” — Isaac Asimov
Star Trek Minutiae | Memory Alpha

Registered: Nov 2000  |  IP: Logged
Cartman
just made by the Presbyterian Church
Member # 256

 - posted      Profile for Cartman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Poking holes in the fabric of space-time == Bad Thing, and could quite possibly mean The End of the Universe As We Know It.

Extracting energy from the fabric of space-time == Good Thing, and a comfortable number of rungs further down on the ladder of Dangerous Do-Not-Try-These-At-Home-EVAR!! Physics Experiments.

[ January 19, 2003, 16:23: Message edited by: E. Cartman ]

Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
J
Active Member
Member # 608

 - posted      Profile for J     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Which is what I was about to post Cartman... as soon as I saw this thread I was ready to post that actually---

Anyway... this is my take. The treaty bands weapons that cause the boundary layer between space and subspace to disappear. Thus making that area of space/subspace very nasty.

The Son'a weapon does that. Quantum torpedoes don't do this, and they aren't even subspace weapons for that matter. They use Zero-Point Energy, a space side only IIRC. However the Tri-cobalt leads to a whole new can of worms which I don't want to retype into just go There -> http://www.subspacerelay.com/~jsharp/continuity/tricobalt.html

PS: I do note that I went back and forth on the idea of what the "Taste of Armegaddon" tricobalt was, just ignore that.

--------------------
Later, J
_ _ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _ _ _
The Last Person to post in the late Voyager Forum. Bashing both Voyager, Enterprise, and "The Bun" in one glorious post.

[email protected]
http://webj.cjb.net

Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
David Templar
Saint of Rabid Pikachu
Member # 580

 - posted      Profile for David Templar     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Finally, we did see Quantum Torpedoes in Nemesis. Big globes of white light, right?

--------------------
"God's in his heaven. All's right with the world."

Registered: Apr 2001  |  IP: Logged
Dat
Huh?
Member # 302

 - posted      Profile for Dat     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
yeah, but we also saw them in First Contact.

--------------------
Is it Friday yet?

Registered: Feb 2000  |  IP: Logged
Timo
Moderator
Member # 245

 - posted      Profile for Timo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Khitomer could of course simply be the future Geneve, a location of many important treaty signings due to a long-standing tradition of diplomacy. Thus, the Khitomer Accords that ban subspace weapons need not be related to either the pre-fake-Martok or the post-fake-Martok Khitomer treaties between the UFP and the Klingon Empire, but could be a third, wholy separate document.

I like the idea of the ban being part of the post-fake-Martok treaty, though, simply extended internationally. If this second treaty was only ratified after Voyager's departure, it's obvious then why she was allowed to carry tricobalt torpedoes even though "The Voyager Conspiracy" calls these "subspace weapons".

I doubt the political climate of late DS9 or VOY, or of the late TNG movie era, would really be conductive to new weapon ban treaties. Banning the q-torps doesn't seem like something Starfleet would want to agree to. These weapons are one of the few things that keep Starfleet ahead of the competition in the unstable postwar world.

Timo Saloniemi

Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
Sol System
two dollar pistol
Member # 30

 - posted      Profile for Sol System     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
the post-fake-Martok Khitomer
But, as I recall saying at the time, there wasn't anything there to suggest that the document Gowron verified was anything new. The whole structure of that scene suggests it was simply a re-ratification of a previous agreement.
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Wraith
Zen Riot Activist
Member # 779

 - posted      Profile for Wraith     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Khitomer could of course simply be the future Geneve, a location of many important treaty signings due to a long-standing tradition of diplomacy.
It's possible the Accords could be roughly equivilent to UN resolutions; a continuously expanding body of agreements between the major powers.

--------------------
"I am an almost extinct breed, an old-fashioned gentleman, which means I can be a cast-iron son-of-a-bitch when it suits me." --Jubal Harshaw

Registered: Feb 2002  |  IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
"The whole structure of that scene suggests it was simply a re-ratification of a previous agreement."

There could have been additions made to it at the time.

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Timo
Moderator
Member # 245

 - posted      Profile for Timo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well, the fate of the Archanis sector, for one. Who got it in the end anyway?

Timo Saloniemi

Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
Jason Abbadon
Rolls with the punches.
Member # 882

 - posted      Profile for Jason Abbadon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I did. It's where I keep my models.
Cheaper than a storage locker too....

--------------------
Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering.
-Aeschylus, Agamemnon

Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3