This is topic Palestinians has finally done it! in forum The Flameboard at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/11/835.html

Posted by BlueElectron (Member # 281) on :
 
http://home-news.excite.ca/news/ap/011212/22/news-israel-palestinians

They've finally done it, Israelies no longer tolerate of Arafat's incompatence.

It is so clear now that Palestinians never wanted peace. It's not only the terrorists
that's behind these violent act, the common people support it too. How else can you explain
public TV programs broadcasting "hate" programs towards Israelies. How else can you
explain similiar "hate" programming in every section of Palestinians media (all of these
can be backed by those special reports on CNN right after the Sept 11th bombing.)

From now on, any people that said that Israelies are bullying Palestinians are hypocrite
, especially American, because guess what, same thing happened to you at Sept 11th,
and to criticize Isaelies' action is to criticize American's action in Afganistan.

[ December 12, 2001: Message edited by: BlueElectron ]


 
Posted by targetemployee (Member # 217) on :
 
The government of Israel has officially severed ties with PLO Chairman Arafat. I see this as the beginning of the end for Arafat and his 'government'. (This is in addition to the US seizing financial assets of the Palestinians in our country's borders and officially supporting Israel.)
 
Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
And what if we criticize both Israel's actions in Palestine and the US' actions in Afghanistan?
 
Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Then you're harming the war effort.
 
Posted by Grokca (Member # 722) on :
 
Except for the fact that Israel is an occupying army, which UN res. 242 states that they were to leave the occupied territories and they have not.
 
Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
No, B.E., you're an idiot.

As has been explained to you on countless occasions, Israel and Palestine have committed to peace. The U.S. and Al Queda made no such commitment to one another, therefore there is no conflict as you claim.

Also, since the bombings are likely not the work of the Palestine government, Israel's attack on government buildings is going to do only one thing:

Further Palestinian resentment of Israel.

Which will then lead to more bombings and the like. Read my signature. And for god sake, I realize English isn't your first language, but when you post, could you at least take a fucking half second and make sure you don't get that damn stagger effect you've got going? It's really fucking annoying.
 
Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
If you don't police your own extremists, you support them. Silence implies consent.

Yes, this conflict is the work of a group of people who will not tolerate any sort of peace.

No, that doesn't apply to all Palestineans (just, apparently, enough of them to make this continuing campaign possible.)

Yes, Arafat has been ineffective at stopping the terrorists, despite knowing who and where they are.

No, a committment to peace does not mean standing there and taking it when the other guy kicks you in the 'nads.

'Making Peace' sometimes means taking out those who would make war.
 
Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
But Rob, they have.
 
Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
They HAVE?

quote:
The Palestinian Authority claimed it had arrested about 170 suspects in a crackdown following a weekend of terrorist attacks that left 25 Israelis dead and three suicide bombers dead.


Emphasis on "FOLLOWING a weekend..."
This guy and his buddies should have been hauled in LONG ago, and everybody knows it.

That's like my little brother, who was a slob as a kid and had a bedroom you couldn't cross.
Mom poked her head in and said 'clean up that room!'
Little brother dilly-dallied, and finally cleared off his bed, and a small path to the door.
Mom poked her head in again and said 'clean up that room!!'
Little brother said 'I DID!'

So they've learned the meaning of 'too little, too late.'
 
Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
Yes, but that was a week ago. The Palestinians are doing this, the Israelis are still attacking. Hmmm.
 
Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
And Hamas and Jihad are still blowing people up.

All that proves is that this snake has more than one head.
 
Posted by Tahna Los (Member # 33) on :
 
Anybody have opinions regarding the "Settlements" that the Palestinians do not like Israel building?
 
Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
quote:
And Hamas and Jihad are still blowing people up.


So, if abortion clinics keep getting fake anthrax letters, should the U.S. Government be bombed for not rounding all the culprits up? Hmm?

C'mon, can you even prove the Palestinian government knows where every member of those groups are ... ?
 
Posted by targetemployee (Member # 217) on :
 
Today, on CNN, I saw Israeli bulldozers bulldoze a TV and Radio Station in Ramallah, West Bank. The Israelis said that the government of Arafat was transmitting messages of hatred from this building.

The issue is not which government is at fault. The issue is what is being taught on both sides to the children. I am seeing children on both sides of the conflict experiencing difficulties in being friendly and approachable to the other. Palestinian children are being taught to hate Jewish children. Jewish children are being taught to be wary of Arabs and Islamic peoples for they might want to kill them. If this teaching continues, there might not be peace for a very long time.
 
Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
quote:
So, if abortion clinics keep getting fake anthrax letters, should the U.S. Government be bombed for not rounding all the culprits up? Hmm?



No, because the people sending the fake letters are not the militant arm of the US government.

However, Hamas and IJ ARE the militant arms of the PLO.

quote:
can you even prove the Palestinian government knows where every member of those groups are ... ?


PROVE it? No... but since Arafat is known to be having meetings with these people in his *cough* attempts *cough* to broker peace, it's pretty clear he knows how to get ahold of most of them, or at least the leaders.
 
Posted by BlueElectron (Member # 281) on :
 
quote:
As has been explained to you on countless occasions, Israel and Palestine have committed to peace. The U.S. and Al Queda made no such commitment to one another, therefore there is no conflict as you claim.


No, Israelies are committed to peace, Palestinians are not, hence Israelies are getting blown apart while the Palestinian authority does nothing.

quote:
Also, since the bombings are likely not the work of the Palestine government, Israel's attack on government buildings is going to do only one thing:

Further Palestinian resentment of Israel.



Governments are always responsible for the terrorist acts committed by their citizens, and Palestinians governement are even more responsible because of their little-to-nothing involvement in controlling terrorists, which indirectly indorse more terrorists.

Palestinians authority (Arafat) keep on saying they're doing something about terrorists, but the rest of the world doesn't seem to agree with the Palestinians (U.S., Brits, etc). So who's right? A 3-year-old can figure that one out.


quote:
Which will then lead to more bombings and the like. Read my signature. And for god sake, I realize English isn't your first language, but when you post, could you at least take a fucking half second and make sure you don't get that damn stagger effect you've got going? It's really fucking annoying.


Man, I'm getting tired of your personal attacks, and by making these personal attacks, you've already lose the argument, even if your stand-point are correct.

When you point at others, there are three fingers that's pointing directly back to you, so by calling me a "fucking idiots", and that makes you what? I'm sure you'll get the idea.
 
Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
Oh, I've offended Blue. Well, gee. Christ, Blue, you're hardly the only guy to get yelled at for not ridding that 'stagger' effect from their posts. Why don't you take half a second before you post and make sure everything is working nice and well, m'kay? I'm not upset that you don't have quite a great grasp of English, but rather that you didn't format your post all that well. MIB got the same treatment. You're not special in this regard, so chill the fuck out.

quote:
No, Israelies are committed to peace, Palestinians are not, hence Israelies are getting blown apart while the Palestinian authority does nothing.


Since you didn't read the CNN article I linked to, I am not going to respond to this.

quote:
Governments are always responsible for the terrorist acts committed by their citizens,


They are? So the U.S. Government is responsible for Tim McVeigh blowing the Murrah building sky high? This is news to me!

quote:
Palestinians authority (Arafat) keep on saying they're doing something about terrorists, but the rest of the world doesn't seem to agree with the Palestinians


Look, do you really think the terrorists want peace? The government has little or no power over what they're going to do. Arafat and the Palestinian Authority may be willing to co-exist with Israel: extremists won't. And targeting those who do want to co-exist isn't going to do anything constructive.

quote:
When you point at others, there are three fingers that's pointing directly back to you, so by calling me a "fucking idiots", and that makes you what? I'm sure you'll get the idea.


I never called you a 'fucking idiot' ... if I did, please point out the link. Stop misquoting people. And since you're pointing at me, that means you're pointing three fingers and a thumb back at yourself.

Have a nice day, B.E.
 
Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Y'know, that "When you point at someone, you're pointing three fingers at yourself" is one of the stupidest things I've ever heard, and I really wish people would stop saying it...

Besides, how in the world is your hand configured if your thumb points backward at you?

Anyway, more to the point...

"No, Israelies are committed to peace, Palestinians are not, hence Israelies are getting blown apart while the Palestinian authority does nothing."

Because every Palestinian wants to blow up Israelis, and every Israeli wants nothing more than to live in peace and harmony w/ their Arab brothers, right? Bullshit.
 
Posted by The_Tom (Member # 38) on :
 
quote:
However, Hamas and IJ ARE the militant arms of the PLO.

No. That's the line being sold by Sharon, but it's blatantly false.
 
Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
Oh,

REALLY?



quote:
"The presence of Hamas on Palestinian territory is very important for building the Palestinian homeland." --- Muhammad Dahlan, head of Arafat's Preventive Security Service in Gaza, in an interview with the Hamas newspaper Al-Risallah (cited in Ha'aretz, 15 June 1997)


quote:
The Council congratulates "all the holy martyrs resulting from the noble wave of opposition to the Israeli Government's settlement activity." --- From a statement issued by the Palestinian Legislative Council on 27 March 1997, just 6 days after a suicide bombing in a Tel Aviv cafe which killed three Israelis (Ma'ariv, 28 March 1997)


quote:
"When we stopped the Intifada we did not stop the Jihad [Islamic holy war] to establish Palestine with Jerusalem as our capital.... We know only one word: Jihad, Jihad, Jihad...." --- Yasser Arafat, in a speech at the Dehaishe refugee camp near Bethlehem, 22 October 1996 (Yediot Aharonot, 23 October 1996)


quote:
"Are there no stones left in Hebron? Where are the stones and where are the mobs? Prepare yourselves for a struggle if the Israelis do not retreat from Hebron." --- Yasser Arafat, addressing Arab legislators in Hebron, 22 October 1996 (Yediot Aharonot, 23 October 1996)


quote:
On Changing the PLO Covenant, which calls for the destruction of Israel: "We have no intention of changing or nullifying the Covenant, rather, we will adhere to it until our last breath since it embodies the essence of our demands."--- Tayseer Qaba, deputy chairman of the PLO's Palestine National Council(A-Nahar, 19 September 1995, page 16


FEAR the Quotemaster!

[ December 14, 2001: Message edited by: First of Two ]
 
Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
Yes, Rob ...

REALLY!



Izzedine al-Qassam is the militant wing of Hamas. Hamas is not a militant wing of anything, since, as logical can tell you, a militant wing does not need a militant wing because it is already the militant wing. It's like saying a hospital needs its own sickbay. I mean, hello?

quote:
The organization is best known for the exploits of its military wing, the Izzedine Al Qassam brigades. These operate entirely on a clandestine basis, and are currently believed to include up to 500 young volunteers for suicide missions. They are organized into small, discreet cells with multiple leadership structures that can quickly replace leaders eliminated by the Israelis or arrested by the PA.

But one of the keys to Hamas's popularity is its large-scale welfare arm. Hamas provides educational, medical and other desperately needed welfare services in impoverished West Bank and Gaza towns and refugee camps, creating a marked contrast with the image of corruption and cronyism most Palestinians have of Arafat's administration. The welfare arm also cares for the families of suicide bombers and others who have died fighting the Israelis, making suicide bombing a macabre form of life insurance in impoverished Palestinian communities. The social services performed by Hamas also create a pretext for the massive funding the organization receives from Muslim charities throughout the Persian Gulf and beyond.

More.



Now, maybe if the Israelis could take a look at the quote I'm using in my signature and realize peace CANNOT be accomplished by firing missiles, something could get done to resolving this problem.

But all anyone seems to advocating is more violence. Violence begets violence ... you want to stop the cycle? Then stop it.

[ December 14, 2001: Message edited by: Malnurtured Snay ]
 
Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
quote:
you want to stop the cycle? Then stop it


The problem with that nice, idealistic viewpoint is that it's completely insane.

Yes! Forget the implacable enemy at the gates! Throw down your arms! Return to your homes! Then there will be peace! (Either that, or your enemy will storm the undefended gates and kill you all, but hey, that war'll still be over!)

Yes, nothing ends a war quite as fast as surrendering. Ask the French in World War II. Moreover, ask the French Jews, French Gypsies, French Homosexuals...

The PLO Charter still calls for Israel's annihilation. Until that is otherwise, all their talk of peace is just mouthfuls of ash.
 
Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
Rob,

Uh, no one said anything about surrender.

One simply said firing missiles into buildings hasn't worked, so why not try something new?
 
Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
Declining to engage in self-defensive tactics when an opponent interested in your destruction continues to attack you, is identical to surrendering in every way that matters.

If you do not resist, you surrender.

quote:
why not try something new?



You mean, like, say, the Peace meetings that took place during Clinton's Administration?

Hm.. Guess 'Clinton's Legacy' didn't make much of an impact on you, if you've forgotten it already, did it? Don't feel bad... apparently it didn't have much of an impact on the Palestinians, either.

[ December 14, 2001: Message edited by: First of Two ]
 
Posted by The_Tom (Member # 38) on :
 
Jihad = essentially untranslatable term. CNN has bombarded us with the idea that it means "holy war." Incorrect, at least as far as the Qu'ran describes it. It gets messy, of course, and you get tangled in the interpretation of religious text, which I know you have little love for. But a moderate Islamic cleric in Rabat might use it to mean one thing, and a loony Islamic racist fellow in Britain (what's that one guy's name, again?) to mean another, and Arafat to mean another, and Hamas to mean another, and bin Laden to mean a fifth and so on. Basically if you're ostensibly Islamic you can term any struggle against something a jihad. What the something is and to what lengths you can go is wide open.

And I think if the quotemaster were to investigate the Oslo Accords he'd find that the Palestinean Authority, under its terms, agreed to recognize the state of Israel. Show me where Arafat has called for the annihilation of Israel post-Oslo and I'll give you a cookie.

[ December 14, 2001: Message edited by: The_Tom ]
 
Posted by Cartman (Member # 256) on :
 
quote:
Hm.. Guess 'Clinton's Legacy' didn't make much of an impact on you, if you've forgotten it already, did it? Don't feel bad... apparently it didn't have much of an impact on the Palestinians, either.


No influence at all. Wasn't like Rabin was popped by uber-fundy Amir, or anything.
 
Posted by Omega (Member # 91) on :
 
Now, maybe if the Israelis could take a look at the quote I'm using in my signature and realize peace CANNOT be accomplished by firing missiles

Who was it that said that sometimes, "peace" is just another word ofr "surrender"?

Their enemies will not negotiate. Their options are thus two: surrender to their enemies; annhilate their enemies.

something could get done to resolving this problem

Such as? Their enemies won't negotiate, remember?
 
Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
quote:
annhilate their enemies.

Oh, yeah, they've been real successful at that, now haven't they?

quote:
Such as? Their enemies won't negotiate, remember?

The PA has been to the negotiating table. Since the problem is extremist groups with ties to no-one, perhaps they should be targeted instead of the PA. Hmmm.
 
Posted by Da_bang80 (Member # 528) on :
 
I think we should let them handle it the way they want to. It's like thier just a bunch of babies having a tantrum. Just leave em be so they can calm themselves down. And if they can't come to a peaceful conclusion then just let them bonk each other silly. It's the only way some people learn. Bullies and crack-pot dictators included.

But that's just my opinion.
 
Posted by USS Vanguard (Member # 130) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Da_bang80:
It's like thier just a bunch of babies having a tantrum.



yeah, a 60 year old religious tantrum. that's one helluva baby.
 
Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
quote:
extremist groups with ties to no-one


Extremist groups always have ties to someone. That's why it's been so hard to smash them up to now. Iran's been sheltering them. Or Libya. Or the Taliban. or Iraq. Or higher-ups in the PLO.

quote:
In a May 10th Al-Quds newspaper interview, Yasser Arafat once again explained to the Arab readership that his agreement to the Oslo accords is to be compared to the pact which Muhammad made with the Arabian tribe of Koreish. Muhammad, who signed the ten-year peace treaty, overcame the Koreish tribe once he had amassed enough strength. This quote and others are documented in a Government Press Office release today which is attached at the end of this news report.

Question: Do you feel sometimes that you made a mistake in agreeing to Oslo?

Arafat: No... no. Allah's messenger Mohammad accepted the al-Khudaibiya peace treaty and Salah a-Din accepted the peace agreement with Richard the Lion-Hearted."


[Note: Arafat is referring to the Khudaibiya agreement made by Muhammad with the Arabian tribe of Koreish. The pact, slated to last for ten years, was broken within two years, when the Islamic forces - having used the peace pact to become stronger - conquered the Koreish tribe. His reference to Salah a-Din is to the Muslim leader who, after a cease-fire, declared a jihad against the Crusaders and captured Jerusalem. This marks the second time in a month that Arafat has compared the Oslo Accords with the temporary truces signed by Muhammad and Salah a-Din. Previously, he made the comparison in an interview with Egyptian Orbit TV on April 18, 1998.] --- PA Chairman Yasser Arafat in a newspaper interview (cited in Al-Quds, May 10, 1998)



I can taste that sweet cookie now...

[ December 15, 2001: Message edited by: First of Two ]
 
Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
Oh, and to the "ARafat and the PLO have no knowledge of these terrorists" fool-camp, I have a list of 12 wanted killers/extremists/terrorists serving on the official Palestinian police force.

*Waves list, McCarthylike*

But THIS list, you can look at too.
quote:
12 Fugitives Serving in the Palestinian Police:

1. Bassam Subhi Issa - involved in planning the terror attack on Yoel Solomon street in Jerusalem on October 9, 1994. Two people were killed and eight injured in the attack when terrorists opened fire on the crowded street lined with open-air cafes. He also planned the December 1994 bombing at Jerusalem's Convention Center which injured 13 Israeli soldiers. He also took part in the murder of three IDF soldiers in April 1993. He was arrested and later released by the Palestinian police, and was then drafted to serve in Jibril Rajoub's Palestinian Preventive Security Service.

2. Bassam Khalil Abdel Rahman Aram - resident of Khan Yunis; took part in the attempted murder of Zvi Fixler at Moshav Gan-Or on December 10, 1993. He was arrested and then set free by the Palestinian police and now serves in the Palestinian security forces.

3. Yasser Muhammad Musa Aram - resident of Khan Yunis; active in Islamic Jihad; took part in the attempted murder of Zvi Fixler at Moshav Gan-Or on December 10, 1993. He was arrested and then set free by the Palestinian police. He now serves in the Palestinian security forces.

4. Nafez Mahmoud Sabih - involved in planning the two suicide bombing attacks on Bus 18 in Jerusalem on February 25 and March 2, 1996, and the suicide bombing attack in Ashkelon on February 25, 1996. A total of 45 people were killed in the three attacks, for which Hamas claimed responsibility. Currently serves in the Palestinian security forces.

5. Imad Mahmoud Issa Abbas - took part in the murder of Moshe Bino and Amikam Zaltzman, who were stabbed to death in their Karni vegetable packing house near Gaza by terrorists posing as buyers on June 25, 1992. Currently serves in the Palestinian security forces.

6. Atef Hamadan - took part in the attempted kidnapping and murder of an IDF soldier on September 18, 1992, and the murder of several Palestinians suspected on collaborating with Israel. In September 1996, he was arrested and then released by the Palestinian police, and was drafted to serve in Jibril Rajoub's Palestinian Preventive Security Service.

7. Rajah Khalil Ali Abu-Sita - resident of Khan Yunis; a Fatah activist who was involved in the murder of Uri Megiddish of Gan-Or on March 9, 1993. He currently serves in the Palestinian security forces.

8. Amru Abdallah Abu-Sita - resident of Khan Yunis; a Fatah activist who was involved in the murder of Uri Megiddish of Gan-Or on March 9, 1993. He currently serves in the Palestinian security forces.

9. Iyad Hamdi Abu-Shakafa - resident of Khan Yunis; Fatah member involved in the attempted murder of Shaul David in Ramle on February 9, 1994. Currently serving in the Palestinian police.

10. Iyad Abdelkader Ismail Basheeti - resident of Rafah, Gaza; Hamas member, involved in the murder of two Israelis in Ramle on August 26, 1994. He was arrested and then set free by the Palestinian police, who then drafted him to join their ranks.

11. Yusuf Mahmoud Abdelaziz Malahi - resident of Rafah, Gaza; Hamas member, involved in the murder of two Israelis in Ramle on August 26, 1994. He was arrested and then set free by the Palestinian police, and currently serves in their ranks.

12. Ibrahim Lateef Shaheed - resident of Tulkarem; Fatah member wanted for the murder of Labib Latif Shadeed, a suspected collaborator with Israel, on October 12, 1994. Currently serves in the Palestinian security forces.



Thanks, YashaNet News.
 
Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
So they were 'turned' ... I mean, Rob, I don't see you demanding the Israeli pilots who attacked the Liberty be discharged from their military. Well, they're probably out by now, but the point is the same.
 
Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
"Turned."

Riiiight.

If you believe that, I have some nice oceanfront property in Nebraska I'd be interested in selling you.

I kinda don't think there's any legitimate police force in the WORLD that openly accepts wanted fugitives from justice into their ranks. Certainly none in the 'civilized' world.

[ December 15, 2001: Message edited by: First of Two ]
 
Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
So, essentially ... Palestinians attack Israelis, they can never ever be trusted to work with Israelis.

On the other hand ... Israelis attack U.S. Warship, aw, it was just an honest accident. Really.
 
Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
quote:
they can never ever be trusted to work with Israelis.


Not when they harbor terrorists. Not when they shelter criminals and killers in their own ranks.
 
Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
quote:
AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL
Latest Press Releases

Israel/OT: Impunity for Killers of Palestinians
AI Index: MDE 15/004/2001
Publish date: 24/01/2001

"The sentence handed down to Nahum Korman sends out a powerful message - that Israelis can kill Palestinians with impunity," Amnesty International said today. The human rights organization was commenting on the decision of the Jerusalem District Court to sentence Nahum Korman, a 37-year-old Israeli citizen, to six months community service for the killing of an 11-year-old Palestinian child, Hilmi Shawasheh. He was also ordered to pay 70,000 shekels to the victim's family.

The punishment is in sharp contrast with the six and half year sentence given to Su'ad Hilmi Ghazal, a Palestinian from Sebastia village near Nablus who in December 1998 at the age of 15 and whilst suffering psychological problems, injured an Israeli settler by stabbing him. Immediately after her arrest, despite being a minor, she was held incommunicado without access to either a lawyer or her family for 27 days, for 17 of which she was held in solitary confinement. Since then, Su'ad Hilmi Ghazal, whose mental health deteriorated as a result of the ordeal, has been held for two years in the women's section of Neve Terze prison in Ramle.

"These two contrasting sentences reflect a deeply rooted culture of discrimination against Palestinians, which permeates the Israeli justice system,"Amnesty International said. "People have a right to be treated equally under the law, regardless of which community they come from, yet his clearly does not apply in Israel."

Both Nahum Korman and Su'ad Hilmi Ghazal were sentenced on 21 January 2001.



::snort::

And you wonder why Arafat doesn't turn people over to Israel. Maybe if Israel would be fair ... one would think that of all the trials faced by the Jewish people over the millennia, they'd be on the top at treating everyone the same. Then again, hows about setting up a U.N. or other international tribunal to handle this? Might help.

I also notice on your list -- with one exception -- you couldn't come up with anyone post-'94. Gee, looks like Arafat stopped harboring terrorists, didn't he?

Then again, if he thought they'd get a fair trial, maybe the Israelis would've gotten them.
 
Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
Look again. Two 1996's. That's the last time I can find that that list was updated. Still, that doesn't deny the fact that it happened. I doubt very much that the PA handed over those gentlemen after Oslo.

I also notice you base that 'won't get a fair trial' argument on a single case... not very scientific.

Such a strong need to defend this guy...

However, if you want to use a news report from a country known for its fairness...
how about Canada? I got this off of a Canadian "News of Israel" page...

quote:
The Palestinians murder a 10-month-old Jewish girl.

Wednesday, March 28, 2001
It was a quiet day in Hebron. Yitzhak and Oriya Pas, two Jews who chose to settle in Judaism's second holiest city, were taking their 10-month-old baby for a stroll. From a hundred or more yards away, Israeli authorities say, a Palestinian Arab sniper put the baby's head in the crosshairs and killed her with a single rifle shot.

The girl's name was Shalhevet, which means "flame." It may well be too much to hope that her murder will illuminate our understanding of what is happening in the war against the Jewish state. But even against the backdrop of the bloody anti-Jewish riots that swept the West Bank and brought the war to Jerusalem, it is hard to think of a killing as cold-blooded as this.

This is not a case of a child being caught in the crossfire. It is different from the tragedy of Muhammad al-Durrah, the young Arab boy who was famously photographed crouching and clinging to his desperate father as the two of them sought to avoid the gunfire that moments later claimed Muhammed's life. Nor was it the case of someone snapping under stress, as happened when an Israeli soldier, Baruch Goldstein, murdered Arabs as they knelt in prayer at a shrine in Hebron. The killing of Shalhevet Pas, Israel's military authorities believe, was a premeditated, precision assassination by a sniper a long way from his target.

Which is one reason why it elicited not even a note of remorse from the Palestinian Arab leadership. Reuters did manage to find a member of Yasser Arafat's cabinet in Amman, Jordan, at a meeting of Arab dictators exploring ways to keep financing the attacks on Israel. It quoted the minister, Yasser Abed Rabbo, as saying there is no evidence that the baby was killed by Palestinian fire. "We believe that the atrocities of the occupation are responsible for all crimes that have claimed the lives of Palestinians and Israelis," he said.


The war against the Jews of Hebron began long before Yasser Arafat came of killing age, and in the struggle between East and West in the Middle East, Hebron plays a seminal role. Jews have lived in Hebron for centuries, not far from the Cave of the Patriarchs, burial place of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob. But in a classic pogrom in 1929, the Arabs turned on them and began a slaughter that claimed the lives of more than 60 religious Jews, including women and children.

The pro-communist left sided with the Arabs and sought to portray the killings as a grass-roots uprising against British imperialism, for those were the days of the British Mandate in Palestine. But the anticommunist left understood the killings for what they were and began to swing behind the logic of a Jewish state.

This group included the Jewish Forward newspaper, which was allied with the anticommunist labor movement and, much to the astonishment of many on the left, ran out a famous editorial. It sided squarely with the Jews of Hebron. It also contrasted Hebron with earlier pogroms, such as Kishinev, where Jews "were slaughtered like Oxen in a butcher shop." In Hebron, it reported, yeshiva students fought back against their attackers, filling Jews the world over with admiration.

Nonetheless, the Jews were largely, if not completely, driven from Hebron by the pogroms of 1929. They didn't go back in any numbers until after Israel's victory in the Six Day War of 1967. Years later, when I was editing the Forward, I more than once went back and read that editorial to try to understand the roots of the left's loyalty to the Arab struggle--and, for that matter, the eagerness with which the Clinton administration tried to pressure Israel's government into pulling out of Hebron.

Even at Oslo, Israel had refused to do so entirely. It clung to the Cave of the Patriarchs. But it did agree to turn over the remaining parts of Hebron in pieces. The Oslo map in Hebron gave the commanding ground dominating the Jewish neighborhood to the Palestinian Authority. One such domineering position was Abu Sneina Hill, where Shalhevet's assassin lay in wait.

Israel's commitment to pull out of Hebron was given by Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin back in 1995. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu negotiated hard on the details, fearing the kind of tragedy that has just occurred. Security arrangements agreed to at the time even included limiting long-range rifles in the hands of Palestinians. But the Clinton administration cajoled and pressured Mr. Netanyahu, and in January 1997, he and Yasser Arafat signed a protocol on Hebron. Within weeks, Israel began pulling back, setting the stage for Shalhevet's murder.


What Israel's new premier, Ariel Sharon, is going to do now is an important test, and not only because there is an Arab summit in progress. The Jews living in Hebron are reported to be in an angry mood and moving to take matters into their own hands. Reuters quoted an Israeli colonel as saying that the Israeli army might have to restrain the settlers.

Mr. Sharon, however, issued a statement saying he "holds the Palestinian Authority responsible for the instances of violence and terror which brought about the murder today of the baby and the wounding of her father in Hebron."

If it turns out that Monday's assassination marks the end of Israel's retreat from Hebron, the little flame of Shalhevet Pas will burn in Jewish memory for generations.




[ December 15, 2001: Message edited by: First of Two ]
 
Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Jihad can be literally translated, actually, as "struggle." Of course, that's just the word, and doesn't really reflect the depth of meaning put into it. It isn't a specific commandment of Islam so much as it is an overarching principle. Muslims are to put their whole lives into agreement with God. That includes the political life as well.
 
Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
Maybe I am being a bit too stupid about this.

But I really think that anyone expecting that shooting some missiles at Palestinian terrority will do anything constructive is wrong.

Israel has one of the most renowned intelligence agencies of all time ... why can't Mossad track down who is behind the attacks and send an spec-ops team to capture them?

At the same time, in one of the links I posted, we all found out that one of the reasons for Hamas' popularity is because it is "...its large-scale welfare arm. Hamas provides educational, medical and other desperately needed welfare services in impoverished West Bank and Gaza towns and refugee camps, creating a marked contrast with the image of corruption and cronyism most Palestinians have of Arafat's administration."

(And people are surprised Arafat doesn't have any say).

It seems to me, that a better security net for the future for Israel would be to provide these services, either directly or through another party (Arafat?) who is willing to work with peace. It may not immediatly stop the violence, but I think it would go a long way to bringing peace.

As it is now, a Palestinian goes into Israel and blows himself up. In response, the Israelis shoot some missiles into Palestine, and some bereaved family members of those killed in the missile strikes strap themselves up with dynamite and so on, and so on, and so on ...

(And, yes, Rob, I did mention the Palestinian post-'94, although I did only list him as one, since I wasn't counting number of attacks, only people ... )

(Then again, I'm also curious when Bin Laden blows a hole in the USS Cole, we call him a terrorist, but we don't call the Israelis terrorists when they bomb the USS Liberty.)

[ December 15, 2001: Message edited by: Malnurtured Snay ]
 
Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Perhaps I'm being overly simple here, but surely if there was a solution as simple as that suggested by either side here it would have already been employed? It seems to me that not every problem in the world can be resolved.
 
Posted by Cartman (Member # 256) on :
 
Any problem can be solved, with enough determination and cooperation. Oh, and a lot of $$$.

Reality-check: the average Joe Paleschmoe and John Israsmith have both grown up in a world of hate and violence. So, regardless of what the leaders of each respective party may be trying to accomplish, the ordinary citizen - or extremist - would rather see the other side completely obliterated - status quo, in other words - than a peace-treaty signed. If it wasn't for one certain fundie (Amir, whose name I have already mentioned), peace - albeit a fragile one - would have already *been* established.
 
Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
So the secret is to obliterate everybody's Fundies.

Hm...

Surely there's somebody somewhere that would be willing to fund such an operation.
 
Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
Don't you already have a secret army massing under your library? What do you need funding for?
 
Posted by Cartman (Member # 256) on :
 
A secret army of... bookwurms.
 
Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
Conquerer BookWyrms, thank you.

And I'm a despot, not a revolutionary.

[ December 18, 2001: Message edited by: First of Two ]
 
Posted by Cartman (Member # 256) on :
 
An uber-bookwurm, in other words.
 
Posted by BlueElectron (Member # 281) on :
 
For those of you that still think that Palestinians are a peace-loving people with only the "absolute few" that's causing the current crisis in Middle East, think again!

http://home-news.excite.ca/news/ap/011219/00/int-israel-palestinians

and I quote:

quote:
A new poll showed more than half the Palestinians opposed a halt to the fighting


Which mean they ain't as peace loving as you thought, MORE THAN HALF of the population support the terrorists.

So guess what, I was right on calling some of the Americans in this board hypocrites. Didn't almost all of you fully support what Bush is doing now to crack down on terrorists? Didn't Bush said something along the line that if you support or harbor terrorists, then you're a terrorists?

By the definition made by your president, which you guys elected and supported, more then half of Palestinians are terrorists, which Bush mention again and again, should be absolutely hunted down with no negotiations!

For those of you still on the side of Palestinians, I declare you the BIGGEST hypocrites in the world! What the hell is it going to take for you to see the truth? Maybe one day Palestinians decide to target Americans on their own land, then you'll agree with me.

[ December 19, 2001: Message edited by: BlueElectron ]
 
Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Well, that was some cogent and lucid criticism.
 
Posted by Cartman (Member # 256) on :
 
Though he does have a point, like it or not.
 
Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
I had a brilliant post certain to be well-recieved by all who read it, but then IE crashed. Imagine that. So instead I'll have to just say that I don't think he does have a point, and it isn't his percieved point that I necessarily have the problem with. It's the presentation that bugs me to no end, with its either/or fallacies and the like.
 
Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
Or the fact that after posting it here he dedicated a whole thread to it.
 
Posted by Grokca (Member # 722) on :
 
I guess this isn't one of Blue Electrons friends

Envoy Can't Remember Insult
Updated: Wed, Dec 19 11:28 AM EST

LONDON (Reuters) - France's ambassador to Britain cannot remember referring to Israel as "that shitty little country" during a private conversation with a newspaper owner, his spokesman said on Wednesday.

The spokesman said the ambassador, Daniel Bernard, was shocked to see media reports of a private dinner conversation he had had with Conrad Black, owner of the Daily Telegraph, which attributed the remark to him and depicted him as anti-Semitic.

Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's spokesman said the remark -- if correctly reported -- would be anti-Semitic, while the French Foreign Ministry dismissed the media reports of the incident as "malevolent insinuations."

The conversation took place at a buffet party at Black's London home at the end of last week.

Black's wife, journalist Barbara Amiel, wrote in her column in the Telegraph on Monday that "an ambassador of a major EU country" said the whole of the current international security crisis could be blamed on "that shitty little country Israel."

Subsequent press reports named Bernard as the ambassador responsible.

"He doesn't remember saying that," the ambassador's spokesman, Yves Charpentier, told Reuters on Wednesday.
 
Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
How in the world would that be anti-Semitic? If I say Afghanistan is a shitty country, is that anti-Islam? Afghanistan is a shitty country. It's spent years under rule by überoppressive religious fundamentalists, and it's spent a couple months getting the fuck bombed out of it.

Even if the guy did say Israel is a shitty country, so what? If he thinks the country is shitty, he thinks the country is shitty. I don't see what the relative shittiness of a country has to do w/ hatred of a large, wide-spread group of people.
 
Posted by The_Tom (Member # 38) on :
 
If you have any clue who Conrad Black is, it would be wise to ignore such pap altogether.
 
Posted by Grokca (Member # 722) on :
 
I know who Conrad Black is I just thought this was funny.
 


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3