This is topic The Enterprise-C in forum Starships & Technology at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/6/1329.html

Posted by Azakaze (Member # 645) on :
 
Hey guys....

After reading posts for sometime now (but I couldn't make it through all 50-odd pages), I was wondering if you could answer some questions that I might have, concerning the Enterprise-C and Ambassador class vessels in general.

Firstly, does anyone have any stills, etc. of the Enterprise-C bridge as seen in Yesterday's Enterprise? I have the diagram issued out in the Star Trek magazine, but what I'm really looking for is the LCARS design used on the computer panels and the coloring.

Also, I'm wondering if any of you have ideas about how an engine room on a vessel of that class would be layed out.

Any response here would be great. I can also be reached at [email protected]
 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
Well, there's nothing canon on this so anythign anyone would say is going to be totally made up.
The bridge in "YE" seemed to have a more TMP style look to it. I believe the coloring of the LCARS and what not harkened back to the Ents. A and B.

The whole ship seems to have an art deco feel so I'd take that into consideration when thinking about room design. You're probably not going to find the plushly carpeted, well lit rooms like you do an a Galaxy Class. I'd say metal deck plating with carpet here and there.

But like I said, there's absolutely nothign official on this area of that ship.
 


Posted by mrneutron (Member # 524) on :
 
"Art Deco" feel? The Enterprise C?

She doesn't have any of the characteristics I associate with art deco. I mean, the grill of the neck could be on anything from deco to moderne. None of the lines or detailing on the rest of the ship suggest deco to me. No spirals, no zigzags, no sweeping curves. The D is more deco than the C...and even she ain't really there either.

You want deco...watch Flash Gordon from 1980...THAT'S wall to wall deco.
 


Posted by Siegfried (Member # 29) on :
 
Dude, I like so totally saw that movie!
 
Posted by Mr. Christopher (Member # 71) on :
 
Actually, if you want art deco interiors, look at the Romulan Warbirds.
 
Posted by Spike (Member # 322) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Azakaze:
but what I'm really looking for is the LCARS design used on the computer panels

There are a few displays in the Continuing Mission book. Unfortunately I don't have this book. Just one scan:
display
 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
By Art Deco, I mean the use of circles and blockier solid shapes. The Ent D is more Art Noveau...lots of curves and stuff...obviously the ships aren't going to fit either classification perfectly...

sigh

*vows never to conjecture about anything again*

[ July 23, 2001: Message edited by: Aban Rune ]


 
Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
I think the Enterprise-Cs engine room has a high cieling for most of the dec, with an open area in the middle where the warp reactor core is, fed by matter and antimatter injectors from above and below. Electro plasma conduits run backwards from it into the distance, one to each nacelle. a protective railing keeps you from falling down that shaft, and there are ladders around it to scale up to various point around the injectors. The is probably a Master Situation Display and maybe even a large table with displays in the work area. perhaps a catwalk around the warp core on upper and lower decks. Also there is probably a chief engineers office/work area and an entrance to the jefferies tube system.

But seriously, its not gonna be too different from the 1701-A or 1701-D because they both used the same engine room in the movies, so a transition between them would look exactly like them. Except with different carpeting and lighting of course
 


Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
Well, the Enterprise-A only had the doughnut-like warp core in ST VI, not in ST V.
 
Posted by Jack_Crusher (Member # 696) on :
 
for Ambassador pictures, go here http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/articles/ambassador.htm . As for the computer system, I THINK that the Enterorise C used a touch computer system similar to the system onboard the Enterprise A in ST6:TUC.
 
Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
Because the Enterprise-A's warp core wasnt shown in Star Trek V. They couldnt even afford to show Shatner's rock monsters on that budget. So the only time weve seen the 1701A's reactor was in STVI, unless you think they changed it between movies because they *would have* used a different warp core, but didnt
 
Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
Well, considering the ST IV, V, and VI bridges, it's not an unreasonable assumption.
 
Posted by Siegfried (Member # 29) on :
 
Actually, we did see the engine room in The Final Frontier. Well, we did kind of. We got a shot a curved doorway with Scotty inside the doorway standing at a pedestal station with a purplish light glowing on him and the wall. I can't remember exactly where it was, but it was definitely in the first half.

The Enterprise-A had some major reconstructive surgery performed on her. Other than a new bridge module being snapped on, the corridors got a major overhaul as well. They weren't just blatantly the Enterprise-D corridor sets. I can't remember, but didn't the transporter room also have some cosmetic changes between The Final Frontier and The Undiscovered Country? I know both featured the Enterprise-D set, but I want to say that they differed a bit.
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
I believe (but am not sure) that the ST5 transporter room had a freestanding control console, whereas for ST6, a control booth in the TMP stype was built. Perhaps Scotty hadn't had the time to re-erect a booth for the mission in ST5, after stowing it away for some repairs?

Other than that, I'd speculate that the difference between ST5 and ST6 interiors was simply due to somebody getting fed up with all the decorative panels and carpets blocking service access to the ailing components, and ripped them all off, revealing the original bulkheads (which were of very similar styles in ST2-3 and ST6, actually).

Or then the carpeting was only there on the corridors reserved for VIP use - including the observation lounge with the subspace transmitter, and, for some weird reason, the corridors outside the brig. The rest of the ship might have looked like it did in ST6.

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
Back to the subject... Yeah, the E-C computer graphics were deliberately made to look like the E-A and Excelsior ones. Some other period starships, like USS Hathaway and the E-B, shared that basic style (too bad it wasn't invented yet when the Stargazer was shown in "The Battle"). What little we saw of the Bozeman seemed to be in this style, too.

The engineering area of an Ambassador class ship has perhaps never been seen, but it has been described in the "New Frontier" novels which used to rotate around an Ambassador (although a putative post-Wolf 359 refit specimen). Now that ship is dust and the hero is flying around in a Galaxy class vessel, though, so the "New Frontier" comics are unlikely to show us how the room would have looked like. The single comic out so far, "Double Time", showed us a transporter room and a bridge done tastefully in E-C style yet with suitable alterations to reflect the refit and the fact that one of the characters would have objected to having stairs on the bridge...

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
A possible explanation for all the carpet in ST:V - the captain of the Yorktown was really a transplant from one of Kirk's unseen adventures to the 1970's (he eventually went to the academy) - they hadn't even had a chance to remove the been bags from the rec-dec! ;o) HANG-ON! I have further evidence for this 1970's trip... anyone notice the large medallion and uniform with 'standard lapelles' on McCoy's uniform in TMP!?!

I hope they edited them out for the special edition. ;o)
 


Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
I thought Scotty's 'working' scenes in STV were in the transporter room. Thats where he was standing, at the beaming panel, and thats where the light came from. When Klaa's ship blasted them, you can see it blowed up real good behind him and woudlnt work no more. Sparks went all over the pads.

I especially like how they still had Next Generation door signs on all the doors in the corridors.
Okuda was too busy to notice that when he was having the 'Deck 52' door sign made? Or maybe the Enterprise-A's Next Generation style corridors were all located on Deck 24-52 (which are all located at the highest point on the ship at the top of the turbo shaft based on the signs numbers getting higher as they went up)
That's a pretty tall ship..

[ September 11, 2001: Message edited by: CaptainMike ]


 
Posted by Woodside Kid (Member # 699) on :
 
I thought the corridors down in the engineering hull were pretty damn silly. What's the point of all those pipes running across the corridor just above deck level and the low-hanging ceiling conduits? Think about it: they sound red alert and you have to rush to your battle station. Do you really want to have to worry about tripping or braining yourself as you run? You'd think after three centuries in space we'd have learned better!

Oh...about those turbolifts: seems pretty strange to have triangular shafts with cylindrical lifts. Lot of wasted space there.
 


Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
Actually, i think that corridor was supposed to represent one of the large jefferies tubes, so that there was no chance scotty and the escapees would run into any crewmen whom sybok had 'relieved of their pain'. It would fit since the set was a redress of the jefferies tube built for 'The Hunted' when Roga Danar was sabotaging the ship, and was clearly identified as a 'jefferies tube' in that episode.
 
Posted by Woodside Kid (Member # 699) on :
 
Possibly, but then I have to ask why there is so much wasted space? Seems to me you'd want to make the most efficient use of space as possible, given the limited resources aboard any vessel.

Besides, I spent 6 years doing flight simulator maintenance in the Air Force. Engineers NEVER make things easy for the poor suckers who have to fix the equipment.

As to it being a Jefferies tube, I think the dialogue sounds more like they're talking about a corridor network, what with all the directions Scotty gives Kirk to get to the turboshaft. A series of maintenance conduits would be more limited as to where you would be able to go.

For that matter, Kirk's the captain of the bloody ship! How in the hell can he get lost on his own command ?
 


Posted by Siegfried (Member # 29) on :
 
To do a minor hijack to my earlier point, not all of Scotty's "working scenes" were in the transporter room. There was one somewhere in the engineering section. Here's a picture from that sequence: picture

This is in the early part of the film, Kirk is talking to Scotty over the intercom about the Klingons going to Nimbus III. Scotty says something to the effect of "We'll beat those Klingons there even if I have to get out and push."
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
One could use the brightly colored GNDN pipes in that corridor/tube as evidence that the E-A was a refitted TOS-era ship. The refit might not have resulted in a completely optimal ship: some of those awkward pipes could simply not have been relocated when a Jeffries tube was opened past them. Or then they had to be relocated from somewhere else, and the only place to shove them to was the "tripwire level" of the Jeffries tubes.

One could also say that Scotty had to spend a greater deal of time off the main engineering room than usual, given that the ship was falling apart from every seam. His little people might have been tending to the warp core while he himself ran from location to location patching together the subsystems with duct tape and self-sealing stembolts.

Personally, I found those supposed Jeffries tubes a very enjoyable and believable part of the E-A interiors, second only to the big shuttlebay set in attractiveness. The TNG-lifted corridors were just plain silly, the lounge nondescript, the holding cell with neon-tube bars not even funny.

The triangular-cross-section vertical turboshaft could have been intended for three simultaneously running lifts, I guess...

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Woodside Kid (Member # 699) on :
 
quote:
Personally, I found those supposed Jeffries tubes a very enjoyable and
believable part of the E-A interiors, second only to the big shuttlebay
set in attractiveness.

I wasn't crazy about that set, either. Seemed pretty damned cramped to me, especially compared to what we saw from TOS and TMP. And why store your shuttles in the main landing bay? Isn't that like parking a jetliner on the runway?

quote:
The triangular-cross-section vertical turboshaft could have been
intended for three simultaneously running lifts, I guess...

Sorry, not big enough for multiple turbolift cars, unless she's got single-passenger lifts we haven't seen before (outside of the ones in main engineering, that is).
 


Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
And the bridge being on Deck 52?

The real reason for some of he set problems is that the studio wanted the E-A to look like it was part of the evolution towards the E-D.. so they had a lot of beige carpeting and plush interiors, but this really got confusing when Nick Meyer, who is a real naval adventure buff, decided to go with a very attractive 'nuts and bolts' look for he E-A in ST-VI.. same bridge set, except with plate metal floors and the beige trinm and leather pads replaced by grey and Federation blue metal. I think Nick's idea for the look (and the prod. designers like Zimmerman who enacted it) was much better though, and is pretty much the standard when they have gone back to design ships from the E-A, E-B, E-C era
 


Posted by Ryan McReynolds (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by CaptainMike:
The real reason for some of he set problems is that the studio wanted the E-A to look like it was part of the evolution towards the E-D.. so they had a lot of beige carpeting and plush interiors, but this really got confusing when Nick Meyer, who is a real naval adventure buff, decided to go with a very attractive 'nuts and bolts' look for he E-A in ST-VI.. same bridge set, except with plate metal floors and the beige trinm and leather pads replaced by grey and Federation blue metal. I think Nick's idea for the look (and the prod. designers like Zimmerman who enacted it) was much better though, and is pretty much the standard when they have gone back to design ships from the E-A, E-B, E-C era

I'm rather fond of the theory that there was a hot period in the Federation-Klingon cold war between those movies. It would explain...

(1) The Enterprise-A getting a gunmetal-gray "military" refit from its earlier beige "peaceful exploration" look.

(2) The crew feeling extremely uncomfortable with Klingons aboard the ship in Undiscovered Country after sharing a lighthearted celebration with them in Final Frontier.

(3) The Empire launching the I.K.S. T'Ong, described in "The Emissary" as during a period of war.
 


Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
Its pretty obvious the whole ship desperately needed a refit (retrofit?) after Star Trek V. I wouldnt be surprised if Scotty had the whole f*cking heap taken apart and put back together again.. with higher beams and wider doorways too....
 
Posted by Woodside Kid (Member # 699) on :
 
If that's the case, I can't say much for quality control in Starfleet's shipyards. Who would have passed that flying junkheap in routine inspections? If it takes an engineering genius like Scotty to get a brand-new (or newly refit, take your pick) starship into working order, would you sign up to serve aboard one of htese accidents waiting to happen?

Then again, maybe it's standard policy to make their new starships totally useless at first. Remember the E-B?
 


Posted by akb1979 (Member # 557) on :
 
I think that comparing the E-A to the E-B is a little harsh. The E-B was on a media trip and had a pussy (pardon) for a Captain. How the hell he got beyond Ensign is beyond me. Plus they had to get Kirk trapped in the Nexus, so the ship had to have minimal equipment. "Won't be installed until Tuesday" - oh boy! The ship should never have left spacedock without its major systems, but hey!, that's Paramount script writers for you. Starfleet had obviously got very soft very quickly with regards to its shipbuilding policy and standards.
 
Posted by Ryan McReynolds (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ryan McReynolds:
I'm rather fond of the theory that there was a hot period in the Federation-Klingon cold war between those movies. It would explain...

(1) The Enterprise-A getting a gunmetal-gray "military" refit from its earlier beige "peaceful exploration" look.

(2) The crew feeling extremely uncomfortable with Klingons aboard the ship in Undiscovered Country after sharing a lighthearted celebration with them in Final Frontier.

(3) The Empire launching the I.K.S. T'Ong, described in "The Emissary" as during a period of war.


Oh, and...

(4) The Enterprise-A being decommissioned after less than a decade of service. A war could do that to a ship.
 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Unless the A was a refit.
 
Posted by Obi Juan (Member # 90) on :
 
Yeah, I believe that the early decommisioning was some of the best (well okay--only) canonical evidence that the A was another starship (Yorktown) that was renamed.
 
Posted by Ryan McReynolds (Member # 28) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sol System:
Unless the A was a refit.

Oh, I think it was a refit, too.
 


Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
The only problem is that, even though Roddenberry and Okuda support the fact that it was the renamed USS Yorktown, the movie depicted the USS Yorktown being stranded in space shortly before the crew arrived on Earth. With a full crew, Captain, etc. Did they just tow them in, tell Captain Randolph, his first officer, chief engineer, security chief, surgeon, helmsman and communications officer to take a hike because some new guys deserved this ship more? How would the remaining few hundred crewpoeple feel about sucha random decision by the Federation council. I know some my argue that politics and military assignments arent always fair, this seems a little extreme to displace 7 officers and repaint their ship as a political favor. Seems more likely that the Yorktown, presumably the same refit old one from TOS was retired (being a similar age and design to the already retired 1701-no suffix) and a new one was being built and just renamed before it was launched.
Renaming an old ship seems like bad karma.

Unless Okuda was wrong, and it IS a refit, but of another vessel besides the Yorktown renamed. This would explain why it was quickly decommissioned five years later

[ September 13, 2001: Message edited by: CaptainMike ]


 
Posted by Woodside Kid (Member # 699) on :
 
quote:
The ship should never have left spacedock without its major systems

That's my point. The Navy doesn't grant a ship her commission until she passes a pretty damned thorough series of evaluations. Why should Starfleet? Especially when you consider that on a naval vessel, you don't have to worry about how you're going to breathe if the power fails.
 


Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
The Enterprises seem to be media darlings though.. I think that in the cases of the E-A and E-B they were being sailed around for political reasons. I don think either vessel was intended to enter the actions they did in those films. And i also believe Starfleet uses a different tangent of the concept of 'commissioned' because even when the ships are taken apart in dock they seem to be considered commissioned, whereas the Navy would decomission and recommission the vessel every time it was refit (i believe? Navy guys?)
 
Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
I also suspect the E-B was being sailed around due to political or commercial pressure: the Excelsior project might not have been in much favor if the NX-2000 indeed had humiliatingly failed in demonstrating transwarp, her supposed raison d'etre. Too many promises may have been made, regarding schedule and performance of follow-on vessels of the class.

This could also tie in to why the E-A was retired so early. If the Excelsiors could not be transwarp superships, then Starfleet might have begun marketing them as Constitution successors. Constitutions had a high public profile, and the names Enterprise and Kirk had an even higher one. The smart move for Starfleet would be to declare all the Constitutions as outdated and insist that they be replaced by the Excelsiors *now*, thus justifying the project already underway.

Naming the first post-transwarp Excelsior the Enterprise and dragging in Kirk to do a PR tour would further help market the idea that these ships were the rightful inheritors of the Constitution fame.

As for the Yorktown theory, that ship's crew was left in mortal danger when we last saw them. Perhaps there wasn't a happy end to the story, and Starfleet towed home a big starship-shaped coffin? The ship could have been renamed to scare away the ghosts in any case, and the need to find something to reward Kirk with provided extra incentive.
And Starfleet probably wasn't all that happy to reward a mutineer, despite the public pressure, so giving him a former deathtrap after a half-hearted refit might have evoked grim smiles on some high-ranking faces...

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
The Enterprise-B didn't seem in that bad of shape, anyway. They didn't have torpedos, a main tractor beam (presumably they had mooring beams, if that technology was in use at the time), or a medical staff. Well, why should they? Puttering around the solar system has to be more like sailing in a harbor than the open ocean. What sort of emergency could possibly happen that other ships couldn't take care of?

The ship's only problem was that it found itself in a film, which neither it nor Starfleet had any say in.
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
Me, I think Starfleet rigged it up so that there would be no other starships present in the Sol system to steal the E-B's big moment. That plan just backfired badly...

Or perhaps the other ships were sent away because Starfleet wanted no witnesses should the half-finished ship fail? Sure enough, when she first went to warp, she was torn apart: all of the modifications that distinguished her from the Excelsior were sent spinning into space. Just watch the snippet of the ship warping toward the Nexus... Good thing they were able to recover and reattach the pieces without any of the reporters aboard noticing.

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by Obi Juan (Member # 90) on :
 
She was warping toward the Nexus?

I thought they hadn't installed the warp drive yet.
 


Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
Apparently it did (and, just to avoid confusion, Timo's referring to the fact that they used a shot of the Excelsior from ST VI for the shot at warp. Unless you're looking out for it though, you probably wouldn't notice).
 
Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
Ooh a stock footage problem.

I noticed another one. In ST.III and ST.VI the Excelsior's nacelles didnt light up, and they kept this for the Excelsior reuses in TNG.'Where No One..' and TNG.'The Child' but then in VGR.'Flashback', supposedly portraying the original Excelsior, the nacelles suddenly glow blue. Except where they used Excelsior ship shots from ST.VI.

But then, Tuvok doesnt remember Valtane not dying and the fact that the Khitomer conference was two months after Praxis, not two hours, so hes just suffering from virus-addled brains.
$Endgame spoil
$
$
$

$

$
But they cured that in 'Endgame' by getting him home in time before he went completely insane.

ok.. ive wandered far enough off the beaten thread..
 


Posted by Woodside Kid (Member # 699) on :
 
Help me out here, it's been a while since I saw STVI. How much of a clear shot did we see of the Excelsior in warp? I don't mean the rainbow-smear shots. Was there a clear enough shot that we could see whether or not the engines were glowing blue? The reason I'm asking is that I remember reading a little blip somewhere that the original Excelsior model's engines were designed to light up; it was just never filmed that way.
 
Posted by PopMaze (Member # 302) on :
 
IIRC, the only warp shots of an Excelsior was the rainbow smeared shot from ST6 and used again in ST7.
 
Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
They made some new shots of it for the Excelsior getting torpedoed by Kang's ship while warping towards the Azure Nebula. in 'Flashback'

The nacelles were lit up while the ship wasnt at warp, in the nebula too i blieve. ill check
 


Posted by PopMaze (Member # 302) on :
 
Of course, that Excelsior was a new model that Greg Jein built after the original was too heavily modified into the E-B and Lakota to be turned back to it's ST6 appearance. Whether the grills of the original model could be lit up remains to be seen, but they did light up when it was turned into the E-B. The new model did have lightable grills for sure and I believe that was the model the was used to make the CGI Excelsior.
 
Posted by Stingray (Member # 621) on :
 
Re: Navy ships being decommissioned for refit
Almost positive that it doesn't happen that way.

Re: USS Yorktown
Maybe Kirk hauled the Yorktown's captain and crew's collective asses out of the fire in some exciting galactic adventure and the Yorkie captain had said that he owed an extreme debt of gratitude to Kirk. Yorkie captain offers his ship to Starfleet and the Feds to repay this debt. Sounds implausible written here, but surely the Big E and her noble crew have had more advenures than have been catalouged in the historical documents.

Maybe the Yorkie crew presented their ship as a present to the Ennie crew for some unknown and noble reason.
 


Posted by The Red Admiral (Member # 602) on :
 
I think it's plausible that the Yorktown was nearing decommisioning anyway. it was a good few decades old at this point, and the current crew were possibly offered another ship, maybe another called Yorktown. Tuvok named a vessel called Yorktown which was in service around the early 2290's.

So with the original Yorktown nearing retirement anyway, perhaps it was rescued by Starfleet topbrass, overhauled, renamed Enterprise, and given to Kirk to command for a few years until it finally gave up the ghost for good.
 


Posted by Reverend (Member # 335) on :
 
or the Yorktown crew never made it back and the ship was discovered floating in space with 400 bodies floating about. So they towed it back, gave it a new paint job and a serious hose down just in time to flog it off to kirk & co, no questions asked.
 
Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
I dont like thinking that the probe killed people... i think they would have found a way to survive for a little while anyway, its not like it was actively destroying starships..

And in my mind, the E-A was not the Yorktown disabled by the Probe. just doesnt work.
 


Posted by Obi Juan (Member # 90) on :
 
quote:
I dont like thinking that the probe killed people

Probes don't kill people. Failing life support kills people.
 


Posted by Woodside Kid (Member # 699) on :
 
Was there enough time to get all this done? Remember, the probe's transmissions crippled any ship it passed by, and it was obviously orbiting Earth for a substantially longer period of time. Seems to me the damage to Starfleet's Earth-based installations would have to be much more extensive. Would there really have been enough time for Starfleet to patch up all the damage, go out, find and haul the Yorktown back to Earth, and slap a new registry on her? The interval can't have been all that long; IIRC, Kirk's uniform still had flag officer trim on it, even though he'd replaced his rank pin.
 
Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
Perhaps Kirk kept that old jacket out of sentiment and nobody really dared tell him to get a line-officer one? I seriously doubt a new ship was handed to Kirk within any period shorter than a month after the trial, regardless of the origins of the ship.

And the Probe might either have done serious system damage (in which case the Excelsior would probably get repair priority - and if she was a candidate for Kirk's crew, then some major time had apparently passed), or then virtually no damage (in which case the Yorktown would be basically in working order, just with the batteries drained and the crew lamentably but neatly dead). It certainly did not blow any traditional holes in the hull, so the repairs were probably very unconventional, and repair time estimates a matter of guesswork.

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
Still think it wasnt the Yorktown.. the only reason we're fixated on that is because of Okuda's comments from his books.. the only reason Roddenberry said 'its probably the renamed Yorktown' is because he was joking because the 1701-no suffix was originally named yorktown, in early production stages. But we always seem to want to take Okuda's injokes as continuity points (i.e. U.S.S. City of New Orleans; S.S. Buckaroo Banzai, etc.....)
 
Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
OK.. heres some deal on Navy use of the term 'commissioned'

excerpts from the Dictionary of American Naval Fighting Ships, about the status and history of vessels:
I picked the Yorktown but found a few who were decommissioned and then recommissioned for what simply amounted to a refit:
CV-10 Yorktown:

quote:
On 21 March 1955, she was placed in commission, in reserve, at the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard where she was to receive extensive modifications-most significantly, an angled flight deck to increase her jet aircraft launching capability. She completed her conversion that fall and, on 14 October, was placed back in full commission.

The aircraft carrier resumed normal operations along the west coast soon after recommissioning.


and also the Constitution in an older case about the status of a ship while being worked upon:

quote:
Ordered to Boston, she was placed in ordinary for 6 years, undergoing extensive repair. In May 1821 she was recommissioned, serving as flagship of the Mediterranean Squadron, under Commodore Jacob Jones

 
Posted by Obi Juan (Member # 90) on :
 
quote:
Would there really have been enough time for Starfleet to patch up all the damage, go out, find and haul the Yorktown back to Earth, and slap a new registry on her? The interval can't have been all that long; IIRC, Kirk's uniform still had flag officer trim on it, even though he'd replaced his rank pin

What if they did travel to the A shortly after the trial. Who knows how much time between Kirk and Co. saving the world and standing trial. The Federation President and Starfleet probably came up with Kirk's punishment some time before the trial and made the necessary preparations.
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
One thing about the trial is that Gillian Taylor was ready to leave for outer space aboard a science vessel. One would thus assume she'd either already done all she could for George and Gracie to ensure their survival and procreation (which would probably take quite a bit of time, her being the only expert on the subject in the whole universe and all)... Or then she'd supervised the euthanasia of the two after the Probe had safely departed (which would take less time, but there would still have to be a safety margin before Starfleet would decide the Probe would not return with a Columbo-like "Oh, and by the way...").

I *can* imagine her going "screw the whales, I get to go to SPACE!", judging by her enthusiasm in her final scene. I just think the writers would have expected her to perform her sacred duty to the utmost, and all that.

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by AndrewR (Member # 44) on :
 
LOL @ Timo's post reguarding Gillian...
 
Posted by Spike (Member # 322) on :
 
quote:
One thing about the trial is that Gillian Taylor was ready to leave for outer space aboard a science vessel.

And if the science vessel was a maritime vessel?
 


Posted by Aban Rune (Member # 226) on :
 
Timo, you crack me up...

"Oh there's just one more thing, sir, while I'm thinking of these things..."
 


Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
quote:
One thing about the trial is that Gillian Taylor was ready to leave for outer space aboard a science vessel.

quote:
And if the science vessel was a maritime vessel?

Then we can be reasonably sure that it was a Ferengi who sold her the tickets. Or, barring the presence of the Ferengi that early in the timeline, perhaps Harry Mudd made it back from planet Mudd? In either case, she should have known better than trust a person who is being "nice" to a blonde from out of town.

Timo Saloniemi
 


Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
What was her exact quote in the movie?

BTW, the graphic novel Debt of Honor depicts the newly demoted Captain and Doctor Taylor chilling on his yacht (a sailing one yes, but i couldnt see the bottom to see if it would fit under his saucer) awaiting the birth of the whale.. um .. pups.
He had to steal the 1701-A (!) to go fight extradimensional predators in the neutral zone, but made it back in time to see the birth and share some Chateau Picard with Gill.

Its, IMO, one of the best comics it spans from the Farragut at Tycho all the way until post-ST:IV and has lots of fun guests along the way. It only got too ambitious by trying to explain Kor's lack of head-ridges. And Kirks old half-Roumlan half Vulcan girlfriend showing up 30 years later with a grown up kid seems a little suspicious for the continuity minded (So they met in 2254.. its 2286 now.. oh, your daughter is 32? my..)
 


Posted by Woodside Kid (Member # 699) on :
 
IIRC, the quote goes like this:

"You're going to your ship, I'm going to mine. Science vessel. I've got 300 years of catchup learning to do."

She never mentions that it's a space ship. Hell, since she's studying whales, it could be a submarine for all we know.
 


Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
I think it probably refers to her new job chilling with the whales, changing their diapers, whatever
 
Posted by Shik (Member # 343) on :
 
Is that the graphic novel where the yacht was named Edith Keeler? I think I've seen that...
 
Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
Kirk has an ancient (22nd century sailing revival) schooner he rebuilt named Edith Keeler. Described in 'Dreadnought!'

However, the yacht pictured in 'Debt of Honor' couldnt be it, because it is a modern built yacht.

Kirk's schooner was wooden, and Piper stated that the 'y' word wasnt allowed because it was a manned sailing vessel, not a pleasure craft and had no powered engines save for a sealed emergency motor.

The boat in 'Debt' may have been Taylors science ship, since they were using it to follow the whales.
 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Oy.

Whales have calves, by the way.
 


Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
 
i knew it was probably something dumb like that.

the novelisation of ST:IV had the probe finding the whales conversation a little dull i think.. ill look it up.

did it go on to the Klingon homeworld to see if its old friends that hump-headed whales were still there? 'We killed them.. they were troublesome' 'Do they still sing songs of the great whale hunt?'
 




© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3