[ September 17, 2001: Message edited by: The Vorlon ]
Posted by The_Tom (Member # 38) on :
*removes delectibly cutting remarks once Vorlon realises his failure to <CCSpeak>RTFT</CCSpeak>*
[ September 17, 2001: Message edited by: The_Tom ]
Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
RTFT?
Posted by Omega (Member # 91) on :
"Read the frelling thread"
Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :
Danke. Any thread in particular?
Of course, it helps that I don't know this thread's particular title ...
Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
I'm reading.....
Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
We don't delete threads. Charles thinks it's one stepped removed from demanding that we say "Information is Slavery", and "4 + 4 = 5"
So what was the original title, eh? I'm going for "So, the Yamoto then. What's up with the registry there?"
Posted by Mr. Christopher (Member # 71) on :
It was "Pre-E Schematics!" or something like that.
Posted by CaptainMike (Member # 709) on :
Well it couldnt be the Yamato (sp) because we already sttled that its 1305-E like Riker said.
Unless the characters and dialogue in the Star Trek universe arent canon, because Okuda contradicted them in his off-screen graphics? Because Star Trek isnt about humans boldly going, its about signage? And yeah, i still cant read in slo-mo the saucer they blew up, so what was printed on it at the studio is moot. If we'd read the saucer of the Yamato in 'Where Silence Has Lease' It would have said 1701-D, and would you argue that was supposed to be the number?
*whew*
Posted by Veers (Member # 661) on :
1305-E debate will never officially be settled. I'm sorry, Mike, it just won't happen. People can believe what they want, but there will not be a settlement... Now, would Vorlon like to comment on the title?
Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
"Well it couldnt be the Yamato (sp) because we already sttled that its 1305-E like Riker said."
Are we reading the same forums here? Because in my non-crazy world, we stood around arguing for several pages, and then everyone stuck with what they originally thought. Pretty much like a session of Parliment then.
We should listen to Veers, the shining becon of correctness in this world of non-correctness.