Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Community
»
The Flameboard
»
One Down, Two to go
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Guardian 2000: [QB] [QUOTE]And which one of "us" would you like to see die?[/QUOTE]Thanks for reinforcing my point. [QUOTE]A president whose favorite accomplishment is having fabricated evidence to bring the country into an unwinnable war honors the previous president who fabricated evidence to bring the country into an unwinnable war? Imagine that.[/QUOTE]Oh, you poor misguided creature. Bush did not fabricate evidence. The intelligence he employed is the very same intelligence that Clinton and friends had . . . the difference was that in the world post-9/11, it seemed time to do more about it than lob a few explosive penises to feel better about ourselves. Clinton invariably failed to act decisively on real security threats to the United States. Why else was Sandy Berger stealing related documents from the National Archives in his socks, hmm? But I digress . . . let's ponder who was fabricating what: "He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983." - Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998 What's this? Sandy Berger said Saddam had WMDs two years before Bush was elected? My god, the tendrils of the Bush evidence fabrication conspiracy run very deep! "One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line." - President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998 Clinton, suckered into Bush's trickery two years before the election. "If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program." - President Bill Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998 "We must stop Saddam from ever again jeopardizing the stability and security of his neighbors with weapons of mass destruction." - Madeline Albright, Feb 1, 1998 Clinton and his appointed US ambassador to the UN, suckered into Bush's trickery two years before the election. "[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs." Letter to President Clinton. - (D) Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, others, Oct. 9, 1998 John Kerry in his first loss to the treacherous trickery of . . . what did he call him in '04? "That dumbass from the sticks" or something like that? "Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process." - Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998 Even Pelosi's psychotic ass was on board. "Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies." - Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999 "We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them." - Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002 "We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002 Kennedy's [URL=http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3827/is_200312/ai_n9318614]old KGB contacts[/URL], with whom he'd allied to try to undercut President Reagan (thereby 'sleeping with the enemy' for domestic political gain) could've told him if this was wrong. But then, given Kennedy's habits, he was probably in bed with someone in Saddam's government anyway. "We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 Al Gore, former VP, 'knew' of WMD stockpiles in Iraq. Evidently this was because, like Clinton et al., he'd been suckered into the lies of the evil neocon conspiracy for the past four years. Of course, the fact that the CIA was largely run by leftists, some who were leftovers from Clinton's administration (hence all that Valerie Plame crap and various other public frictions between the White House and CIA) deflates that concept somewhat, but we shouldn't let little things like facts detract from our rabid Bush-hating. "Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power." - Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002 "The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..." - Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002 "There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002 Damning proof of Bush's evidence fabrication! "In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." - Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002 Hillary herself . . . the same one who claimed to have conducted an independent review of the evidence Bush was using before voting for military action . . . . . . and then, like Kerry, would now vote against it. "We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction." - Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002 Original list: http://www.glennbeck.com/news/01302004.shtml I think the best take on the matter is an old quote from an online adversary of mine: "Hatin' on Bush is the TREND. Compare him to Hitler? Nah, man, compare him to EBOLA! Ooh, I got an erection just [i]typing[/i] that!" President Bush is certainly not without his failings, but the lies and distortions of the rabid left are simply unsupportable. Of course, as with Falwell, you've proven my point that "us" and "them" are highly modified concepts in the leftist mind. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3