Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
Original Universe versus Prime et al.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Guardian 2000: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by TSN: [qb] The people in charge of the Star Trek shows currently being produced claim that those shows take place in the same universe as the shows that came before. [/qb] [/QUOTE]Yes indeed . . . they claim all as part of Prime, specifically. Even the effort to use Goldsman requires that acknowledgement. [QUOTE] [qb] Not really much point in arguing about it. [/qb][/QUOTE]I consider my point unobtrusive, but it is apparently deeply offensive to a few here. As I was pointing out upthread, though, what's the problem? Suppose CBS came out at the beginning and said "this is a reimagining of Trek in a new universe based on and inclusive of the old one whose story, along with other stories, it continues" (a decent summary of the many quotes some don't like), instead of these things being said bit by bit over time. Can anyone explain to me the downside? It seems to me that there isn't one. Indeed, as far as I am concerned, had they simply declared a fresh universe at the beginning they’d have saved themselves and the fractured fanbase a lot of headaches. But again, what's the problem with the way it is that some of us have known via various pathways since 2018? Everyone can enjoy what they like and no one steps on anyone's toes about minutiae. It isn't like they're paying for the DS9 remaster either way, so what's the big deal? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3