Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
Picard s3 News [$$$]
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Spike: [QB] In my opinion Matalas should've stayed away from the treknological parts of PIC. I had my first doubts about him when he claimed that the new Stargazer was a refit of the old Stargazer. And now he seems to be the main force behind the anachronistic Titan-A. Slapping PIC nacelles on a TMP design, naming it Constitution III class because you're a fan of the Constition class and adding an A suffix for good measure is just an asinine way to design a (hero) starship. He also claims that Beverly's ship is an old TNG vessel even though it looks very much 25th century-ish. He also gives a rather petulant impression on Twitter and Facebook and doesn't take well to criticism, even constructive one. So I must wonder if Bass, Drexler, and Krause are really totally on board with his vision or were simply overruled and now have to put a good face on the matter. [QUOTE]Maybe we’ll get lucky, maybe calling it the Titan-A is just shorthand that’s become common among the production staff.[/QUOTE]Bill Krause has already confirmed NCC-80102-A on Facebook. [QUOTE]No ship but Enterprise should have a suffix.[/QUOTE]I'm not totally against suffixes for other ships, but they should be earned. And I didn't get the impression that Riker and his Titan earned this privilege. [QUOTE]Also seen: a two-nacelle version of some STO ship - the Sagan-class? - called the Echelon-class[/QUOTE]Pretty lame. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3