Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Canon confirmations
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Trinculo: [QB] I do not like J. Creighton's web site. Bernd says that J. Creighton is a careful observer of the episodes. I disagree. First, he includes ships that never existed- -the USS Discovery ("Squire of Gothos") -the Copernicus ("The Galileo Seven") How do I know these ships never existed? I have seen the episodes repeatedly and I have read the adaptions of both episodes written in the 1960's. - Karemma ("Starship Down") There is no Karemma. I base my conclusion on the episode and the close captioning. (I know the close captioning can be in error-the USS Gander fiasco. However, if you understand the process behind close captioning, this isn't really an issue.) Second, he ignores the spoken mentions of ships. Two examples- Shuttlepod 1 ("Devil's Due") USS Saratoga ("Wrongs Darker Then Death or Night") For those who didn't catch the reference, you have no excuse. The ship was 'captured' in the dialogue and the closed captioning. Thirdly, even worse since Mr. Okuda uses his site, he fails to include entries from the encyclopedia Two examples- Galileo ("All Good Things...") Hawking (Generations) His site is not to update. Where are the ships from the DS9 TM in his list of Federation ships? Last, I believe that he gets lost in the counting of starships. Since so much of Star Trek is reshot footage, for J. Creighton counting the number of starships, is like a gardener counting the same number of plants in a flower bed over and over. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3