Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
My Starship List
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by TSN: [QB] Well, my own ships list just has SF ships, so I filtered everything else out of your list, and compared the names. I didn't check every class and registry and everything. I just check to see if there were any that one of us had and the other didn't. Most of what I found missing from your list are class ships. USS [i]Nebula[/i], USS [i]Daedalus[/i], and so on. I'll assume you left these out on purpose. If not, now you know. Also missing were the following: USS [i]Discovery[/i] -- "The Squire of Gothos" (TOS) -- This one's still debatable. One would suspect it wasn't intended to be a ship name, but Kirk's poor grammar causes it to only make sense if it is. I choose to include it. You may not. USS [i]Republic[/i] -- "Valiant" (DS9) -- Some people think this is the same as the [i]Constitution[/i]-class ship. I doubt it. USS [i]Yamato[/i] (five of them) -- "Where Silence Has Lease" (TNG) -- If we accept the NCC-1305-E registry as valid (which I do), there must have been five other [i]Yamato[/i]s to precede the one we saw. I also have some questions about things that were on your list. You may have simply copied them from other sources, and other people would have better answers. Hopefully I'll get the answers from someone... USS [i]Cochrane[/i], NCC-8000 -- I think I remember this coming up before. How exactly did we find this out? Was it visible in the episode, or did someone simply claim that that was what the ship said? USS [i]Dauntless[/i] -- More a comment than a question... This wasn't a real Starfleet ship. USS [i]Defiant[/i] -- Another comment... You can't seriously think that the ship was supposed to have said that in WYLB, can you? It was just laziness on the part of the VFX guys. It should be ignored. USS [i]Jenol*n[/i] -- Actually, maybe I have more comments than I have questions. Anyway, the correct spelling of the caves for which this ship was named is "Jenolan". Since no two onscreen sources agree on the spelling, I'd recommend going w/ that one. [i]Kai Winn[/i] -- Are you sure this was a "USS" ship? I hope not... USS [i]Kongo[/i] -- There really isn't any evidence that an [i]Excelsior[/i]-class by this name was ever used. I may have just been an idea in Okuda's head that never made it any further. USS [i]Lexington[/i], [i]Excelsior[/i]-class -- This ship wasn't actually seen in TNG, and the line in DS9 about the other [i]Lexington[/i], IIRC, pretty much says that the TNG one has to be the same as the DS9 one. [i]Shiku Maru[/i] -- Was this ever established to be a "USS"? The Encyclopedias don't give it a prefix. USS [i]Spector[/i] -- Wasn't this just in the Fact Files? I thought the [i]Akira[/i] in MiaB was either unlabelled, or still labelled "[i]Thunderchild[/i]". USS [i]Voyager[/i], NCC-73602 -- Is this assuming the monstrosity seen in the DS9TM is actually the [i]Voyager[/i] preproduction model, and that it was actually seen in DS9 somewhere? USS [i]Yellowstone[/i] -- I don't see any reason to assume this exists in the normal timeline, but some people do. USS [i]Yorktown[/i] -- Why assume the one mentioned in "Flashback" is a new one? USS [i]Zandura[/i] -- As mentioned, this wasn't actually in the movie. NCC-13471 -- I'm just lonst on this one. Weren't the up-close shots in WYLB that showed a [i]Miranda[/i] or two just stock footage? NCC-73916 -- I have NCC-73918. I seem to recall there being a debate over this one in the past. Was a definitive answer reached, or did everyone just go w/ their preference? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3