Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
NX-01???? The registry number dance continues.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Stingray: [QB] I thought of this in trying to attempt to explain the Connie inconsistencies: Be warned - this can and sorta does intertwine with my apparently very unpopular theory that there can be ships that have the same name in service at the same time What if registry numbers were recycled with ship names in the beginning? The Eagle/Constellation/others recycled their regos shortly before the policy was changed (shortly after or during the Constitution production run) to the 'current' scheme. Why was it changed? Shipyards were being built all over the place, not in immediate subspace range of each other and generally the whole naming thing was decentralized to the individual shipyards. It explains the Constitutions and also the ST:III Grissom could have also been commissioned just before the policy was changed as among the first batch of Oberths. Thus, the Oberths don't have to be as ancient as the Grissom implies. The downside however, is that it absolutley requires the 1701 to be the first Enterprise in Starfleet which has been blown to all hell now... [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3