Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
NX-01???? The registry number dance continues.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Hobbes: [QB] This is why a lot of people adopt the idea that ship is given a registry number even before construction has begun. Since the Excelsior was a brand new ship it would take a lot longer to build than the Entente. And since I don't recall the Entente being seen, it could of been the size of a runabout thus even quicker to have built. Is it possible that Starfleet changed it's registry scheme at the end of the 23rd century? Yes. They changed the warp scale, who knows what else. Prehaps they felt the need to update themselves. But as Ryan shows, it's not like there's a complete gap between 2,000 and 11,000. As far as the Prometheus, I still think it was a simple CGI error. I know not everybody accepts NX-74913 as its registry like I do. Since both were on TV that makes both canon, accept whatever registry makes you happy. But I'm tired of seeing "Well look at the Prometheus! NX-59650!! That means registries don't have any chronological order!" Okuda himself said it was [i]semi[/i]-chronological, because even he admits there's flaws in the scheme. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3