Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
NCC-1305-E
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by MeGotBeer: [QB] Let's look at what we're supposed to take as "canon." If the [i]Yamoto's[/i] supposedly correct 5-digit registry had been spoken in dialogue, we could accept that more easily as the correct registry. However, since the case for the registry dispute comes down to: a) Spoken dialogue b) Registry on model which needs to be freeze-framed to see; the producers' intentions It seems to me, intentions are nice, but the spoken dialogue outweights that. If there was another instance of the spoken dialogue contradicting Riker's spoken dialogue, we could use the producer's intent to give the battle to the new spoken dialogue. In any event, I believe that Riker's dialogue should out-weigh the producers' intent. I'm sorry, this just seems painfully obvious to me. More evidence to support Riker's dialogue. Worf said he was "familiar" with the Yamato's layout. Due to other evidence from the producers', we know that even the same class of starship can have varying deck-plan layouts. This seems to suggest that Worf's previous assignment may have been the [i]Yamato[/i] ... and he didn't raise a complaint until he and Riker beamed aboard. If the NCC-1305-E registry was wrong, Worf would've said, "hey! That's not the [i]Yamato![/i]" [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3