Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
How do we explain...
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Cpt. Kyle Amasov: [QB] I think your explanation that the Maquis ship and the Yeager only look similare but are in no way related seems reasonable. The whole Maquis-kitbash should be as canon as the fact that Elkins uses an A-Wing secondary hull and not a custom-made stardrive section. Maybe Starfleet based the design on the Maquis-Raider because that ship has prooven to be an excellet ship if it comes down to maneuverability. They just took the old design and hull-studies and all and constructed an (ugly) sister for the Intrepid. While that ship can operate independently and has good warp systems, the Yeager could be the destroyer-variant, built for scouting the Badlands with increased sensors and engines to hunt down Maquis in the Badlands. Sterafleet already lost an Intrepid in the Badlands while chasing a raider, so this could have been ther argument for building the sub-class. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3