Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
How do we explain...
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Timo: [QB] Registry-wise, the Yeager could belong to just about any of the modern "mystery classes" - Rigel, Zodiac (NCC-61000), but perhaps also Andromeda, Sequoia (NCC-68000-70000). The Elkins could be a Bradbury, then... Interestingly, the Centaur saucer has now been proven to be sufficiently different from an Excelsior one that we can forget about staying true to the Excelsior scaling criteria. Even more interestingly, the top surface of the saucer is apparently speckled with TNG-style elongated portholes, laid out in a pattern following the deflector grid. Should we take that to mean that the saucer topside is six or more decks high, since there are six concentric rows of portholes? Hardly. I guess we'd be safer saying that all those portholes are on a single deck, and simply laid out to match the internal divisions of that deck... The Centaur could be a relatively small ship, like it seems to be in "Time to Stand". Timo Saloniemi [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3