Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Starfleet vs. Real Navies
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by CaptainMaxwell: [QB] The Kapetanov-class Attack Carrier (another variant of the Akira) is a landing ship that incorporates all LP/LC ship of a real navy. But what about the final attack on Cardassia? The Federation/Klingon/Romulan ships tried to destroy the weapons platforms. A simple Tiberius-class Strike Cruiser could start a few quantum missiles and evaporate dozens of this platforms. But Starfleet preferres to sacrifice ships and crews? Not even the "lets bring war to Saddam" US Navy would do this. Okay, the Nebula (and also Springfield) with its pod is a multimission platform and okay the Galaxy can carry a shitload of Marines but it has only a few transporters and no heavy landing shuttles. Maybe a Oberth would make a good planetary surveyor but with its 150-year old warp geometry it will never be a plenty armed fast scout. ---------- "You! Hold my pint while I get the satchel charges. Yes, of course I'm kidding, you stupid bastard - you think I'd trust you with the beer?" [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3