Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Enterprise Class vs. Constitution Class
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Phoenix: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by newark: [qb] Or, another possibility. Maybe both Constitution and Enterprise are subgroups? When Starfleet decided to switch to the more familiar system of class named after prototype, they choose to go with the more common subgroup of the whole, the Constitution, and included the Enterprise subgroups and any other subgroups in that major grouping. This could explain the registries and, possibly, the inclusion of the USS Valiant from "A Taste of Armageddon" in the belief that this starship represented an unknown earlier subgroup of the Constitution family. [/qb][/QUOTE]Here is how I see it: Classes we know of which use Ent-like spaceframe: NCC-950 Class NCC-1000 Class NCC-1650 Class NCC-1700 Class (Constitution Class) So then we assume something like: NCC-1875 Class (Enterprise Class) NCC-2050 Class (Constitution Class [II]) Enterprise Class was succeeded by Constitution Class II sometime between TMP and TVH. Yorktown NCC-1717 was upgraded to Connie-II specs and renamed Enterprise NCC-1701-A. There would be no problem determining which Connie was which because all ships were upgraded to new specs and no Connie-Is were left. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3