Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
FC Nebula---Leeds vs. Farragut thoughts
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim: [QB] I have uncovered evidence which invalidates my theory. The pics [URL=http://www.starshipmodeler.com/trek/nref1.JPG]here[/URL] and [URL=http://www.starshipmodeler.com/trek/nref2.JPG]here[/URL] show the model with the [i]Leeds[/i]' registry on both the nacelle pylons and aft pod pylon, where [i]Farragut[/i] labels used to be. There is no shot showing the dorsal saucer surface, unfortunately, but I doubt that they would change all the labels *except* that one. More likely, the use of "the [i]Farragut[/i]" is merely internal VFX company jargon, in line with David Stipes calling the [i]Miranda[/i] "the [i]Reliant[/i]" and the [i]Galaxy[/i] "the [[i]Enterprise[/i]] D" and such. In this case, ILM had just extensively and prominently refurbished the model as the [i]Farragut[/i] for the previous film, so it makes sense that they would use that designation. And perhaps this is all for the best, given that FC takes place after "...Nor the Battle to the Strong" (DS9), in which the [i]Farragut[/i] was said to have been destroyed by the Klingons! -[b]MMoM[/b] :D <small>[Sorry for stirring this all up again...not really, you fuckers! Muahahahahahahaha!!]</small> [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3