Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
The U.S.S. Brattain and a Registry Nightmare
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Peregrinus: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Mars Needs Women: [qb] Feel free to get angry at me but, where exactly has it ever been stated that ships are numbered chronologically?[/qb][/QUOTE] [QUOTE]To which Shik replied: [qb] It never has, & indeed there are some (like Jonah) who refuse to believe in that, either partly or completely.[/qb][/QUOTE]Eh? I'm one of the ones who [i]does[/i] think registry numbers in the 24th century (and the last fifteen years or so of the 23rd) are assigned sequentially/chronologically without regard to vessel class. [QUOTE]Back to MNW: [qb] Sure it may seem that way more often than not, but it gets kinda goofy when you take into account the Oberth class and Prometheus class as well as the dilemma we have on our hands right now. [/qb][/QUOTE]Yay production shortfalls. *sigh* The [i]Oberth[/i] was intended to be a 24th-century vessel, and not of the same type as the [i]Grissom[/i]. Time and money considerations screwed that up. The [i]Prometheus[/i] is just a case of the scenic art not lining up with the exterior visual effects. I opt to go with the MSD's "NX-74913". ;) --Jonah [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2008 Solareclipse Network.
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3