Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
A Good Old Fashioned Star Trek XI Starship discussion! ($$$SPOILERS$$$)
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by OverRon: [QB] I tried to do some scaling with the trailer image and that pic on gizmodo. Unless my numbers are waaaaaay off (quite possible), then the new E is huge, even bigger than the 725m stated on a few sites. Assuming the viewscreen/window is 2m tall (and it could be anywhere between 1.8m and 2.5m I reckon), then it would make the saucer around 86.8m high, at least on the trailer picture. Taking that 86.8 to the Gizmodo profile view, gives you a length of around 921.3m! That's ridiculously sized! [URL=http://s77.photobucket.com/albums/j76/RonnieBoyUK/Trek%20movie/Big-E%20Scaling/?action=view¤t=scaling-01.jpg] [IMG]http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j76/RonnieBoyUK/Trek%20movie/Big-E%20Scaling/th_scaling-01.jpg[/IMG][/URL] [URL=http://s77.photobucket.com/albums/j76/RonnieBoyUK/Trek%20movie/Big-E%20Scaling/?action=view¤t=scaling-02.jpg] [IMG]http://i77.photobucket.com/albums/j76/RonnieBoyUK/Trek%20movie/Big-E%20Scaling/th_scaling-02.jpg[/IMG][/URL] Also tried scaling it a bunch of other ways, like using the neck life pod port. Depending on the numbers I use to guestimate various things, the length comes out at between 409m and 624m! [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3