Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
STXI Farragut pic is a faaaaaaaake!!!!!!
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim: [QB] I'm a little iffy about saying the registry is NCC-1620 just based on the idea that it could be an in-joke. We can't see the fourth digit, so we can't say what it is. Can we even say for sure that the fourth digit follows 162 rather than precedes it? And Bernd, so long as we're on the subject of correcting [URL=http://ex-astris-scientia.org/schematics/stxi_ships.htm]STXI ship[/URL] errors, there was no [i]U.S.S. Centaurus[/i]. Someone mis-heard [i]U.S.S. Antares[/i], there. Also, while it perhaps can't be taken without a grain of salt, according to this [URL=http://img79.imageshack.us/img79/1513/newtondefiant.jpg]concept art[/URL], the [i]Newton[/i] belongs to the class with the underslung double hulls and the [i]Defiant[/i] to the class with none. (I say take it with a grain of salt because the latter design doesn't exactly match anything in the film, apparently having been revised to create two separate designs, one with a rollbar and underslung hull and one with no rollbar or underslung hull.) [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2008 Solareclipse Network.
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3