Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
STXI Farragut pic is a faaaaaaaake!!!!!!
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Bernd: [QB] http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/temp/art-of-st-fleet.jpg (Courtesy of Mark Gill) My opinion is that this is just the concept, and neither the names nor the designs were set in stone at that time. Some things to note: - The "Excelsior" may be just a placeholder, hence the color. - The Mayflower design probably doesn't have the rollbar (it better shouldn't have one, in order not to be too similar to the Armstrong) - More registry oddities, old-style ships with higher numbers than the Enterprise, although this may be easy to explain away - Perhaps the Mayflower registry was later corrected to NCC-1620 on the model? - If this is all to scale and the Enterprise is 700m, we have a whole fleet of monster ships. - The Mayflower saucer is not bigger than the one of the Enterprise though (how could it, at the stardock the ship of this design looks quite small). - NCC-1727: Newton's year of death, NCC-1769 should have better been NCC-1969... [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3