Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
STXI Farragut pic is a faaaaaaaake!!!!!!
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Dukhat: [QB] Bernd, I own the blu-ray, so you can take my word as gospel. The ship chart (or part of it anyway) is only shown for a few seconds, but both the Mayflower and the Defiant are of the type-III full saucer/two nacelle class of ship. Those guys were either confused or they didn't know what they were talking about. Also, you can clearly see the registry of the Mayflower's wrecked saucer on the blu-ray, and it is indeed NCC-1621, giving us the only confirmed name/registry of the rescue ships in the movie. One more thing: your schematic of the type-III ship is a tad bit off. Like the Kelvin, there's a section of upper pylon leading from the rear of the bridge to the end of the saucer, that would have led to the secondary hull if this ship had one. It's on the ship chart schematic; just omit the rollbar and you'd have what the type-III looked like. BTW (sorry, I just keep coming up with new stuff to say)... there is NO U.S.S. Centaurus. The confusion stems from the sloppy way the actress pronounces the name. She blends in the second "s" in "U.S.S" with the actual name of the ship (Antares), and she also mispronounces Antares as "an-TAHR-is" instead of the proper "an-TAHR-eez." [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3