Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
New ST Enyclopedia ship info
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Dukhat: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Andru: [qb] Thanks for the new info. Is a class name also given for the USS Nova from Nemesis? [/qb][/QUOTE]It's the prototype for the Nova class, even though it has a higher registry number than the Equinox. Okuda just makes up some bullshit reason why this is so. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Capt. Kaiser: [qb] Im wondering whos CGI they used for the Soyuz cus sometimes they like use fan made ones without permission [/qb][/QUOTE]Not only that, but unless I'm mistaken, the side view of the Enterprise-J is the same as Alice Orban's fan-made art from Bernd's site: http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/schematics/enterprise-j.jpg That explains why there's only a side view. I wonder what the policy is for blatantly ripping off someone else's artwork. The more I look at this book, the more it annoys me. You'd think that in the 15 years since the last edition, they would have at least corrected the old errors, or done a little research other than just add the new info. The blatant ignoring of new ship info is really what pisses me off, as that was the primary reason why I bought the book. They could make a brand-new CGI mesh of the Norway class, but couldn't pull a class name or registry out of their ass for the ENT Intrepid type, the Abrams ships, or any starship past the later seasons of DS9? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3