Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
New ST Enyclopedia ship info
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by vwuser: [QB] I am in agreement with Dukat. I am hearing a podcast where Mike and Denise Okuda are talking about this book. They had two years to work on the book. I read Mr. Okuda's comment about the Nova. I find it insulting. In the entry, it is written, "To the uninitiated, this might seem to be a mistake on the part of the graphics department, but we are entirely convinced that it's due to a bookkeeping error at the Starfleet DMV, undoubtedly the result of an unexplainable chronometric subspace anomaly." Mr. Okuda did not update the Woden entry. Instead there is a dorsal view of the DY-100 class ship, with a background note saying, yay, we changed it for the remastered edition and it's of the same class as the Antares (NCC-501). There is as well no entry for the Yorkshire or for the Medusan starship. Yet, we have an entry for the Gorn ship. These inconsistencies irritate me. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3