Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Discovery Starships
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim: [QB] Greetings fellow curmudgeons! Hope all are well! For my part, I don't see what's wrong with the DSC ships. As with ENT before, they may flout our preconceived [i]expectations[/i] of what the pre-TOS era "should" look like, but we simply have to readjust our perspective as to what this so-called "classic Starfleet design aesthetic" [i]actually[/i] is based on what it shows. I found the KT ships much [i]less[/i] aesthetically pleasing, personally (apart from the [i]Kelvin[/i] herself, which is quite decent except for the "rocket nacelle" feature). And DSC's new-old 1701 in particular is infinitely [i]more[/i] so than the one(s) from the Abrams/Lin films, to my eye. I would not find a bunch of stuff that looked more like the Franz Joseph ships or the [i]Loknar[/i] to be any sort of improvement. (Apologies if that's a straw man.) The Klingon ships I'm far less enthusiastic about, but not because they break with any previous design aesthetic. That "green bird" thing got way tired; good riddance, for a while at least. There's always room for a diverse variety of aesthetics in any era, IMO. -[b]MMoM[/b] :D [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3