Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Sci-Fi
»
Designs, Artwork, & Creativity
»
Misc. TOS stuff
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Identity Crisis: [QB] Now I've answered every else's points, I can get back to the start... Really nice chart. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Harry: [qb]I've not included the Larson and Loknar, basically because they're really ugly, and also because the Saladin invalidates the Larson (both Destroyers), and the Surya invalidates the Loknar (both Frigates).[/qb][/QUOTE]Is there some rule that Starfleet only uses one type of Frigate at a time? ;) IMO the Loknar looks cool and being smaller than the Surya with the focus on forward firepower it makes an excellent fast strike ship to the more patrol orientated Suryas. The Loknar is also important because it shows a continuation of the NX-01 configuration into the 23rd century, this is further continued by the Akyazi in the 2290s and the some unseen ships until the rear end gets flipped upside down to make the Akira. The Larson is more problematic. It's larger than the Saladin, and has major design problems if it has TNG/ENT style warp core rather than TAS/Fandom style M/AM reactions in the nacelles. As a Heavy Destroyer it would appear less capable than the two nacelled Detroyat class, however it could be a specialised vessel (the long, low extension at the rear looks ideal for minelyaing equipment). But each to their own. I think that even in teh 2260s Starfleet has room for a main design of Destroyers or Frigates and a number of less numerous, more specialised designs as well. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3