Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Community » The Flameboard » The death of net neutrality (Page 2)

  This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4   
Author Topic: The death of net neutrality
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
A decade? I'm thinking that's a somewhat... optimistic estimate.
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Lee
I'm a spy now. Spies are cool.
Member # 393

 - posted      Profile for Lee     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yes, the Eugenics Wars really did set us back at least fifty years.

--------------------
Never mind the Phlox - Here's the Phase Pistols

Registered: Jul 2000  |  IP: Logged
AndrewR
Resident Nut-cache
Member # 44

 - posted      Profile for AndrewR     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Da_bang80:
It's kind of scary to think that in a decade or so, we may be able to access the internet with only our minds and a computer implant. Someone might create a computer virus that fries your brain. Or uploads dirty perverted anime furry dickchick fantasies into your head. Now THAT'S scary!

I don't want Windows security holes in my brain!
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
B.J.
Space Cadet
Member # 858

 - posted      Profile for B.J.     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by AndrewR:
The whole aol thing - is that why they always (and some still do) advertise "aol keyword:fucknutters" etc.

They still do that in some places? I haven't seen that as part of an ad in quite a while.

B.J.

Registered: Jul 2002  |  IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It's rare, but I still see it once in a great while. I haven't paid close attention, though. I'm guessing it may only be used by Time-Warner companies.
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Jason Abbadon
Rolls with the punches.
Member # 882

 - posted      Profile for Jason Abbadon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by AndrewR:
I thought it was - but I couldn't see his name on the site - it was a bit of a give-away when he said "When, seventeen years ago, I designed the Web, I did not have to ask anyone's permission."

Now I see it says timbl's blog. [Smile]

That's crazy- Al Gore made the internet (He's a cyborg from the future, you know).

$50 bucks says the first to lobby for content restrictions is the MPAA/RIAA.

--------------------
Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering.
-Aeschylus, Agamemnon

Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
StationMaster
Member
Member # 63

 - posted      Profile for StationMaster     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I have been following this with massive dismay.
I still do not fully understand what the Nanny's want, but the truth is, the internet is nothing more than this:

A full reflection of the the human race that populates it.
It is thought, desire, anger, greed. It is happy, sad and insane (and so much more).

There is no light without darkness.

To start looking at regulation, compartmentalising, blocking, raiding and destroying is akin to saying "Stop being human".

Ten years ago, when I first accessed the net, I was astnoished at what I could find and how easily it could be found.
What followed was a revolution, in both technology, software and human interaction.
And the key word there is Revolution.

I know a fair amount about the darker side of the net - some by choice, and other not by choice.
And one thing I know is this.
One man spoils 100,000 peoples fun, and all that is going to happen is they will find a way.
The technology will evolve, the software will evolve. As commercial and political takes control, another thing will grow in its place.

Enough said.

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Jason Abbadon
Rolls with the punches.
Member # 882

 - posted      Profile for Jason Abbadon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by StationMaster:
I have been following this with massive dismay.
I still do not fully understand what the Nanny's want, but the truth is, the internet is nothing more than this:

A full reflection of the the human race that populates it.

HA! I WIN! The human race is made of PORN.
My work here is done.

--------------------
Justice inclines her scales so that wisdom comes at the price of suffering.
-Aeschylus, Agamemnon

Registered: Aug 2002  |  IP: Logged
WizArtist II
"How can you have a yellow alert in Spacedock? "
Member # 1425

 - posted      Profile for WizArtist II     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Skynet/Porn has spoken.

--------------------
There are 10 types of people in the world...those that understand Binary and those that don't.

Registered: Nov 2004  |  IP: Logged
bX
Stopped. Smelling flowers.
Member # 419

 - posted      Profile for bX     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'm a bit confused about what they are proposing and I suspect the confusion comes due to my fuzzy grasp of the underlying technology of the internet.

I am dimly aware that when I open a browser or check my mail, that little packets of data with headers (the IP addresses of sender and receiver and maybe some content data) get sent someplace by my computer with everyone elses packets and some super-sorters pass my data upstream in the direction of where the IP address is. And so currently there is no prioritizing of that data, and my packets, like everyone elses get passed in the order they are received.

Their nefarious plan as the people who own those big backbones or parts of those big backbones is to analyze each packet and, based upon the content of the packet, the sender, the receiver, etc, to give precedence to some while delaying or perhaps even omitting others. Such that if my data packet sent via my RinkyDink ISP, LLC gets passed into BigBackbone ISP Incorporated's network, my little data packet might sit there for a few cycles while their own customer's packets get shuffled. And maybe if the contents of my packet are objectionable that maybe that little packet just gets deleted and isn't passed along to anywhere. Is that the fear/the idea of what's going on? I really am asking, I clearly don't understand exactly what's at stake.

Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged
Shik
There's a million things I haven't done, but just you wait
Member # 343

 - posted      Profile for Shik     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
It's more than just that.

Let's say that BellSouth offers a package of "gold priority" to websites, that they will have better load times, fewer page errors, not as many problems with access. Let's say that, Oh, TrekBBS decides it's a good idea & signs on; conversely, poor jobless Charlie here can't afford the package & doesn't much like the potential for stratification it holds.

Now you're a BellSouth customer looking for a sci-fi board. You wander through a bunch & find that TrekBBS shows up loud & clear, like sitting next to a radio transmitter. You come to flare but it's slower, it lags, images don't load, bandwidth seems compressed than the other. Eventually, you just give up & never come here again. Fewer people show up & fianlly the website dies.

It's WCS to be sure, but imagine that same scenario for the small internet business as well as no-fee sites & you get the general stink of it.

--------------------
"I never agreed with Jefferson once—we have fought on like seventy-five different fronts. But when all is said & all is done...Jefferson HAS beliefs; Burr has none."

Registered: Jun 2000  |  IP: Logged
Nim
The Aardvark asked for a dagger
Member # 205

 - posted      Profile for Nim     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
To start looking at regulation, compartmentalising, blocking, raiding and destroying is akin to saying "Stop being human".
Earth! Hitler! 1938!
Registered: Aug 1999  |  IP: Logged
Sol System
two dollar pistol
Member # 30

 - posted      Profile for Sol System     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
This Scientific American piece is an OK summation, I think.
Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Shik
There's a million things I haven't done, but just you wait
Member # 343

 - posted      Profile for Shik     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Why does Google have a "Chief Internet Evangelist"???

--------------------
"I never agreed with Jefferson once—we have fought on like seventy-five different fronts. But when all is said & all is done...Jefferson HAS beliefs; Burr has none."

Registered: Jun 2000  |  IP: Logged
Sol System
two dollar pistol
Member # 30

 - posted      Profile for Sol System     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
1.) That's how they roll.

2.) "He is responsible for identifying new enabling technologies and applications on the Internet and other platforms for the company."

3.) Chief Internet Scryer would be neater.

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2008 Solareclipse Network.

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3