Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Community » The Flameboard » Tom Tomorrow strikes again (Page 2)

  This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3   
Author Topic: Tom Tomorrow strikes again
Malnurtured Snay
Blogger
Member # 411

 - posted      Profile for Malnurtured Snay     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Hey, we're Americans. What are you expecting?

--------------------
www.malnurturedsnay.net

Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged
First of Two
Better than you
Member # 16

 - posted      Profile for First of Two     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'm not saying there shouldn't be an investigation because of what the Democrats did.

I'm saying if they investigate the Republicans, then they should also investigate the involved Democrats, because fair's fair. It's the only hope they have of snaring the moral high ground.

--------------------
"The best defense is not a good offense. The best defense is a terrifyingly accurate and devastatingly powerful offense, with multiply-overlapping kill zones and time-on-target artillery strikes." -- Laurence, Archangel of the Sword

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Saltah'na
Chinese Canadian, or 75% Commie Bastard.
Member # 33

 - posted      Profile for Saltah'na     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Ditto.

--------------------
"And slowly, you come to realize, it's all as it should be, you can only do so much. If you're game enough, you could place your trust in me. For the love of life, there's a tradeoff, we could lose it all but we'll go down fighting...." - David Sylvian
FreeSpace 2, the greatest space sim of all time, now remastered!

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Malnurtured Snay
Blogger
Member # 411

 - posted      Profile for Malnurtured Snay     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
They should investigate the Democrats for revieving Enron money? Ok ... nevermind that:

* Karl Rove attended meetings on general energy strategy while still owning Enron stock.

* Dick Cheney met with Enron on at least six occasions to discuss energy policy.

* Lawrence Lindsey was an Enron consultant

* Paul O'Neill recieved warning from Enron CEO Lay on two occasions that the company was in trouble.

* Don Evans discussed Enron's troubles with Lay.

* Pat Wood III may have been picked with influence Lay had over Bush.

* Thomas White was an Enron exec for over a decade

* Harvey Pitt was Arthur Anderson's lawyer before being picked by Bush.

* Robert Zoellick served on Enron's advisory council.

* Marc Racciot is a former Enron lobbyist.

* Alan Greenspan was called by Lay about Enron's trouble, but took no action.

In fairness, Joe Lieberman (the head of the investigation into Enron) recieved $2k from the company in the early nineties.

And as Rob pointed out, Robert Rubin has called O'Neill on Enron's behalf.

This goes a lot deeper then just giving money to various campaigns. Bush's administration is lined with people who have deeper connections to Enron then simply recieving campaign cash.

--------------------
www.malnurturedsnay.net

Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged
Jay the Obscure
Liker Of Jazz
Member # 19

 - posted      Profile for Jay the Obscure     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Investagate this whole fiasco.

That there are people on both sides of the isle with Enron money in their pockets is hardly the issue. I'm sure some Democrats will be caught in the backlash from all of this (which may speak more to our corrupt campaign finance system than anything else).

However, as Jeff pointed out, it is easier to list those in the present administration who don't have close ties to Enron than it is to don't.

Meanwhile, Bush/Cheney are creating an energy policy that is in bed with big oil and Enron. Talk about buying influence.

Meanwhile, hundreds of Enron employees are loosing everything because the company made them buy stock as part of the retirement package while company executives officials are selling off their own stock. All under the oversight of the present administration. Talk about criminal.

No wonder Cheney fought so hard to keep information on public policy under his thumb.

quote:
During his run for the White House, Bush fought long and hard to convince us that he was a new breed of conservative -- a Compassionate Conservative. But recent events make clear that he is actually the standard bearer of a far more coldhearted breed. Call them the Enron Conservatives.

Enron Conservatives are people who use political money and connections as levers to free themselves of all accountability to laws, regulations and responsibility -- even to their own employees. Simply put, they are people who consistently, shamelessly and aggressively put their self-interest above the public interest. And when the lives of others are destroyed in the process, they just look the other way and hope that the law does, too.

---

Not that long ago, Bush was vowing to battle domestic suffering with "armies of compassion." Instead, he and his cadre of Enron Conservatives are adding to the carnage.

From and opinion piece by Arianna Huffington. One can read the whole of it here.

--------------------
Great is the guilt of an unnecessary war.
~ohn Adams

Once again the Bush Administration is worse than I had imagined, even though I thought I had already taken account of the fact that the Bush administration is invariably worse than I can imagine.
~Brad DeLong

You're just babbling incoherently.
~C. Montgomery Burns

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Omega
Some other beginning's end
Member # 91

 - posted      Profile for Omega     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Bush/Cheney are creating an energy policy that is in bed with big oil and Enron.

An energy policy that gets input from energy companies? THE HORROR!

All under the oversight of the present administration.

Oversight? Pardon?

--------------------
"This is why you people think I'm so unknowable. You don't listen!"
- God, "God, the Devil and Bob"

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Saltah'na
Chinese Canadian, or 75% Commie Bastard.
Member # 33

 - posted      Profile for Saltah'na     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
They should investigate the Democrats for revieving Enron money?

Fo2 obviously meant those who took campaign contributions, NOT the ones doing the review.

And in three Toronto Star newspaper articles, it appears that among the review committee are Republicans as well. Why not investigate them then?

Meanwhile, hundreds of Enron employees are loosing everything because the company made them buy stock as part of the retirement package while company executives officials are selling off their own stock. All under the oversight of the present administration. Talk about criminal.

This is criminal, and should be investigated to the fullest degree.

An energy policy that gets input from energy companies? THE HORROR!

Perhaps he was saying that not everyone was consulted, like environmentalists and alternative energy people. Oh, and maybe the public too.

--------------------
"And slowly, you come to realize, it's all as it should be, you can only do so much. If you're game enough, you could place your trust in me. For the love of life, there's a tradeoff, we could lose it all but we'll go down fighting...." - David Sylvian
FreeSpace 2, the greatest space sim of all time, now remastered!

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Malnurtured Snay
Blogger
Member # 411

 - posted      Profile for Malnurtured Snay     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
An energy policy that gets input from energy companies?
Assuming thats what Enron really is. How did they make their money? I don't think anyone has been able to answer that ... at least, in anything I've seen.

--------------------
www.malnurturedsnay.net

Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged
Jay the Obscure
Liker Of Jazz
Member # 19

 - posted      Profile for Jay the Obscure     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yes Omega dear, the horror. The President represents 250 some odd million people. Not just Enron, Unocal and Gulf Oil.

The present administration has oversight, oh let's see, because of such things as the Securities and Exchange Commission and appointments thereto. And because Mr. Bush is so busy appointing anti-regulatory people (Harvey L. Pitt) to such regulatory bodies as, oh, the SEC, that yes, when there's a problem there, Mr. Bush has a problem.

--------------------
Great is the guilt of an unnecessary war.
~ohn Adams

Once again the Bush Administration is worse than I had imagined, even though I thought I had already taken account of the fact that the Bush administration is invariably worse than I can imagine.
~Brad DeLong

You're just babbling incoherently.
~C. Montgomery Burns

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Jay the Obscure
Liker Of Jazz
Member # 19

 - posted      Profile for Jay the Obscure     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Some Enron numbers to chew on.

Enron Total Contributions, 1989-2001*

Top Enron Individual Donors, 1989-2001*

Top Congressional Recipients of Enron Contributions, 1989-2001*

Top Presidential Recipients of Enron Contributions, 1989-2001*

Enron: Other Money in Politics Stats

--------------------
Great is the guilt of an unnecessary war.
~ohn Adams

Once again the Bush Administration is worse than I had imagined, even though I thought I had already taken account of the fact that the Bush administration is invariably worse than I can imagine.
~Brad DeLong

You're just babbling incoherently.
~C. Montgomery Burns

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Omega
Some other beginning's end
Member # 91

 - posted      Profile for Omega     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yes Omega dear, the horror. The President represents 250 some odd million people. Not just Enron, Unocal and Gulf Oil.

Which is why he tries to make an energy policy that actually works by learning about the energy business. Those 300 million NEED a workable energy policy.

--------------------
"This is why you people think I'm so unknowable. You don't listen!"
- God, "God, the Devil and Bob"

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Grokca
Senior Member
Member # 722

 - posted      Profile for Grokca     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I found this in a Canadian newspaper, maybe it is a less partisan look at the situation or maybe this guys full of it you be the judge.


Ingram: Enron's fall has little to do with Bush

By BY MATHEW INGRAM
Globe and Mail Update




Monday, January 14, 2002 – Online edition, Posted at 4:19 PM

Some U.S. pundits are already arguing that the collapse of former energy giant Enron Corp. is George Bush Jr.'s version of the Clinton-era Whitewater scandal, or perhaps even worse — a story replete with private phone calls between senior executives and high-ranking officials, suspicious campaign donations and all manner of Texas-style, good-old-boy favouritism. Not only that, but critics say the Enron debacle calls into question the validity of the Bush government's entire energy deregulation strategy.

Is there any justification for such attacks? No — although the U.S. Congress is doing its best to find some. It's calling out the hounds for not just one investigation but a total of six (if you include all the various sub-committees). If the Whitewater case is any guide, these will turn up all kinds of interesting wrinkles, most of which will have no bearing on the actual subject of the hearings. While he was the governor of Texas, did George W. Bush accept football tickets from an Enron executive? That must explain why a $65-billion (U.S.) company went under.

There's no question there are all kinds of links between the Bush government and the energy titan-turned-basketcase. Former Enron CEO Kenneth Lay is an old friend of Mr. Bush, and of Vice-President Dick Cheney — is that surprising, given that the president was the governor of Texas, and Enron is based in Houston? Enron executives also helped finance Mr. Bush's gubernatorial campaign, as well as the campaign of Attorney-General John Ashcroft, who said he is recusing himself from the case.

There's more. White House economist Larry Lindsey was once a paid adviser to Enron; Mr. Cheney's energy task force met with Enron regularly; a top member of the Republican national committee was an Enron lobbyist until recently. Enron employees have donated millions to members of the Bush government over the past few years, including George Jr. Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill and Commerce Secretary Donald Evans got phone calls from Enron looking for help last fall, and one report even says Enron executives called Fed chairman Alan Greenspan asking for government aid.

Again, these links aren't all that surprising — and they only seem suspicious because Enron has become the poster child for corporate mismanagement and funny accounting. Did the company try to use its connections when it looked like its balance sheet was coming apart at the seams? Of course it did. Did it succeed? That's not clear. Phone calls were made, yes — but at least so far, it doesn't look like Enron really got anywhere. Is the fact that they called enough for us to condemn the Bush government now?

Maybe not, critics say — but then there's the fact that the Bush White House clearly engineered the deregulation of the energy industry to benefit Enron, and even removed and/or appointed people to various regulatory bodies at the behest of Enron. Are those charges true? That's likely to depend on whether you think deregulation was the right strategy in the first place. If you don't, then any actions taken in support of it are questionable, and must have been undertaken with some ulterior motive.

At the moment, two things make energy deregulation look bad: the experience in California, and the downfall of Enron itself. But what happened in California — with prices spiking skyward, rolling blackouts and electricity companies filing for bankruptcy — was more a result of that state's energy policies than George W. Bush's government. California underestimated demand, blocked competing energy projects and forced energy providers to use natural gas (which climbed in price).

The fact that prices spiked on the spot market, which Enron was deeply involved in, was a symptom, not a cause.

No matter how it is spun by privatization opponents, Enron's fall is not an indictment of the entire idea of energy deregulation. Opening up natural gas markets and electricity markets so that they can be traded like any other commodity was not something Enron invented so that it could pick shareholders' pockets with the help of George W. Bush. It makes eminent sense, and with proper supervision it can make those markets healthier and provide more protection from volatile prices, rather than less.

Enron's downfall seems more a case of a company believing its own sales job, aided and abetted by some fancy accounting and a compliant brokerage industry. Enron convinced investors — including major banks, pension funds and other institutions — that its energy trading business was a perpetual growth machine, spinning off profits indefinitely. This appears to have been accomplished by keeping most of the real costs behind the scenes, through the use of offshore, supposedly arms-length holding companies.

In that sense, what happened (and is happening) at Enron doesn't seem to be a particularly original story, but merely a very, very large variation on an old tale — one which has little or nothing to do with the Bush government, and more to do with corporate hubris.

--------------------
"and none of your usual boobery."
M. Burns

Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
First of Two
Better than you
Member # 16

 - posted      Profile for First of Two     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Precisely.

--------------------
"The best defense is not a good offense. The best defense is a terrifyingly accurate and devastatingly powerful offense, with multiply-overlapping kill zones and time-on-target artillery strikes." -- Laurence, Archangel of the Sword

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Malnurtured Snay
Blogger
Member # 411

 - posted      Profile for Malnurtured Snay     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Oh, so *now* Rob has nothing mean to say about the 'evil socialist Canadians.' Uh-huh.

And since he didn't say anything about the large article posting, I got no regrets, man [Smile]

quote:
Enron: Pulling the Plug on the Global Power Broker

By Pratap Chatterjee
Special to CorpWatch
December 13, 2001

On December 4, 2001, Enron filed for bankruptcy. Not long ago Enron was the largest energy trader in the world, the largest natural gas pipeline owner in the country and a pioneering force behind energy deregulation. The move resulted in 4,500 layoffs, or 60% of Enron's workforce at its headquarters in downtown Houston.

Employees and investors were stunned. How could one of the most wealthy and powerful corporations in the world go bust over night? Wall Street shuddered; could this be the first in a series of corporate disasters that marked the now official US recession?

In Houston, security guards patrolled the Enron buildings, watching employees as if they were potential thieves as they emptied their desks. Workers flooded into the streets in front, many crying and hugging one another as police on horseback shouted at them to disperse.

"My group was told nothing yesterday, other than to gather personal belongings and leave" former Enron employee Kathleen Salerno wrote in a letter to the Houston Chronicle. "On November 30, we were given the right to move Enron's matching funds for our retirement savings plans from Enron stock to another fund. My personal account amounted to $46.01. Another friend, with almost twenty years service had $102. This is absurd, sad, and I think, criminal."

A Vietnamese-American worker compared the Enron's demise to the fall of Saigon in 1975. "I watched the fear in the eyes of the South Vietnamese soldiers as they retreated and disposed of their weapons. I watched families and friends hugging each other for comfort as they waited in fear for the uncertainties which were about to fall on them. Last Monday those memories came flooding back. I saw chaos and confusion. I saw co-workers and friends hugging one another for comfort."

It was a far cry from previous years when Enron high flyers bought silver Porsches -- the most favored status symbol at the company -- to celebrate annual bonuses as high as $1 million. The company's stock soared to $90 a share at its peak last August, making it the seventh largest business in the United States. For five years in a row Enron was named "The Most Innovative Company in America" by readers of Fortune magazine.

Enron's Empire
Enron was founded in 1985 by Kenneth Lay, a former employee of the now defunct Federal Power Commission and an erstwhile economist at the Pentagon during the Vietnam War. The company was created when Lay merged Houston Natural Gas with InterNorth, a natural gas company based in Nebraska.

Over the years Lay invested millions of dollars in lobbying federal officials and financing their political campaigns to get them to privatize and deregulate the energy industry. In 1989 Enron began trading natural gas commodities to help utility customers shield themselves from risk by locking up the long-term prices that they wanted ahead of time. Enron bought the gas supplies from producers, arranged for delivery and took a cut of every deal.

In time, the company became the largest natural gas merchant in North America and the United Kingdom. This success in the natural gas industry soon made Enron believe it could apply these tactics of deregulation and political influence to a dizzying array of businesses from internet broadband to water, coal and steel. The Economist magazine described Enron as an "evangelical cult," with Ken Lay its "messiah."

This expansion was overseen by Jeffrey Skilling, a former energy consultant at McKinsey & Company, who joined Enron in 1990. Skilling transformed the company into the biggest and most aggressive of the new breed of unregulated energy traders that bought and sold billions of dollars of electricity and other commodities daily.

But instead of bringing prices down for buyers, these transactions had the effect of driving up prices to hundreds of times of production costs, pushing states like California into major debt.

"We are on the side of angels," Skilling, who was appointed chief executive officer of Enron early this year, told a television crew. He dismissed those who saw the company as a profiteer in California's energy crisis. "People want to have open, competitive markets. They want fair competition. It's the American way."

The Emperor Has No Clothes

Then, in mid-August Skilling was forced out of his job, cashing in his shares and options, pocketing some $62 million, while Lay cashed in stock worth $150 million. Two months later the company disclosed it had some internal financial problems and Enron's share price started to spiral downward even faster than it had risen.

Carl Wood, a member of California's energy commission, wryly remarked that Enron had turned out to be "all hat and no cattle -- that's their Texas expression."

Employees were far more bitter. A former Enron employee wrote in the Houston Chronicle that Skilling once said, "'Enron's strategy is simply to take the money outside the building and move it inside the building.' The smartest thing Skilling ever did: leave the building, and take the money with him."

Others, like George Strong, a lobbyist who worked for Enron for 25 years, say that Skilling brought arrogance and greed to the company. "We were looking to do a deal to supply energy to HISD (Houston's public school district), and I explained to them that it would take a year to educate the school district and make it comfortable with changing the way it got its power," says Strong. "The guy I was working with -- he was a director in his late 30s -- started yelling, 'I don't have a year! My bonus is based on what I do this quarter. If I can't get it done in three months, I don't have time for it.'"

Yet even though the boom in new markets and transactions inflated Enron's revenue and made for fat bonus checks, the company was still paying out more than it was bringing in. So Enron's accountants used complex bookkeeping tricks to shift billions of dollars in debt off its balance sheet and into an array of partnerships set up by Andrew Fastow, the company's chief financial officer.

This had the effect of making it look like the company was doing far better than it really was, until mid-October when Enron disclosed that its shareholders' equity (a measure of the company's value) had dropped $1.2 billion in the third quarter.

A week later the company fired Fastow and appointed a special committee to examine the transactions, led by William Powers Jr., the dean of the University of Texas law school. The Securities and Exchange Commission also opened a formal investigation into transactions.

Investors started to suspect that Enron was hiding major losses and began to dump the company shares when Enron revealed that it had $13 billion in debt. Dynegy, a smaller cross-town rival company, agreed to acquire Enron for $9 billion plus the assumption of the debt, with additional financing from Chevron-Texaco, a major Dynegy shareholder.

When Enron disclosed even more debts, the energy traders started to panic and follow the investors by refusing to do business with the company. In late November Dynegy pulled out of the deal forcing Enron into bankruptcy. The company listed assets of $49.8 billion and debts of $31.2 billion, although this total did not include all the company's debts.

In early December Enron's share price plunged to 36 cents from the high of $90 just over a year before, making the company a victim of the very market forces that it exploited to become rich in the first place.

In mid-December, a creditors committee, composed of some of the major banks that Enron owed money to, was to be set up to decide what parts of the company should be sold off in order to pay the bills.

Meanwhile employees who lost their jobs after Enron filed for bankruptcy protection were told they would receive no more than $4,500 in severance pay. They also were told to petition the bankruptcy court to cash in unused vacation days.

However shareholders refused to accept that all the money had simply evaporated. A lawsuit filed in early December accused 29 Enron officers and directors of engaging in "massive insider trading" and making "false and misleading" statements about the company's financial performance while selling about $1.1 billion worth of stock over the last three years.

Senior management are not the only people who profited during Enron's glory days. Between 1997 and 2000 Enron spent $10.2 million influencing Washington politicians.

During the 2000 Presidential campaign the Center for Public Integrity identified Enron as the single largest patron of George W. Bush's political career. A frequent flier on Enron corporate jets, Bush received $774,100 from Enron management and the company itself including $312,500 for his campaigns for governor.

In return then governor Bush helped deregulate Texas electric markets in 1999, permitted "grandfathered air polluters" and passed laws protecting businesses from lawsuits. This close relationship continued when Bush took over the White House. Lay reportedly is the only executive who got a private audience with Vice President Dick Cheney, to discuss the administration's energy policy.

Enron was also a powerful behind the scenes force shaping US trade policy. As a key member of the U.S. Coalition of Service Industries, Enron positioned itself to play a major role in WTO negotiations. These negotiations affect a wide array of services that impact daily life, from health care and education to energy and water. Enron's agenda of deregulation and privatization clearly meshed with Washington's position at the recent WTO meeting. Enron was also on the Board of the National Trade Council, a prime mover behind granting the President fast track authority over all trade negotiations.

Today, as the cash flow dries up so too have Enron's friends in high places. Although Bush and his administration have made sympathetic noises, so far they have refused to bail out the company. Senior officials have said that they are tracking the situation closely, which may be a euphemism for waiting to see if Enron turns out to be more of a liability than an asset.

And despite the fact that Enron's far-flung empire of international subsidiaries from Argentina to Turkey are still operating, there are signs of financial troubles at some operations most notably in India as well as in Brazil. Those operations have been plagued by charges of human rights and environmental abuses.

In India, the company has been in a protracted dispute over unpaid bills and contract terms with the state utility of Maharashtra at the $3 billion Dabhol Power venture, India's largest single foreign investment. Enron has been offering its 65% stake in Dahbol for the knockdown price of $1 billion, but has yet to find any takers. Banks with $ 1.5 billion dollars in loans and loan guarantees outstanding on Dabhol are threatening to seize the plant outright.

In addition, Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International have both documented human rights abuses committed by local police working as a private security force for Enron. Among the violations are numerous incidents of police on the Enron payroll beating local residents opposed to the Dabhol project, including elderly villagers and women. Some were even dragged out of their homes, brutally beaten with night sticks and arrested for refusing to cooperate with the company.

Enron has always enjoyed being a case study for business school textbooks, and may continue to be one for years to come -- for very different reasons. At its zenith Enron derived 80% of its revenue from trading, exemplifying to students how market forces can be exploited for super-profits. Today, it remains a cautionary tale for those who believe in unfettered markets. At the very least, Enron has become a victim of the dot com shakeout and the current recession. The question that remains to be answered is: Will Lay, who rose from humble beginnings, continue to be a powerful Washington insider? If Bush and other politicians persist in giving him access to the corridors of power as they have in the past, Lay may still be able to mount a comeback.



[ January 16, 2002: Message edited by: Malnurtured Snay ]

--------------------
www.malnurturedsnay.net

Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged
First of Two
Better than you
Member # 16

 - posted      Profile for First of Two     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Well.

Most of that (much longer) post was comprised of "Enron sucks and treats its people badly."

Fortunately, none of that is actually in dispute here, so it may be discounted. People with problems with Enron's policies should sue Enron's management, not try to blame Bush.

In fact, the true nature of what SHOULD be the basis of any complaint, it DISCOUNTED by the article itself.

quote:
. Although Bush and his administration have made sympathetic noises, so far they have refused to bail out the company.
Which nicely defuses any hint of impropriety. Bush has done nothing lately for Enron, so what's the beef?

quote:
In time, the company became the largest natural gas merchant in North America and the United Kingdom.
Which means it was certain to be a major player in any realistic national energy policy, no matter WHOSE administration was in charge.

quote:
then governor Bush helped deregulate Texas electric markets in 1999, permitted "grandfathered air polluters" and passed laws protecting businesses from lawsuits.
Which worked well in that state, and is pretty much a standard Republican platform. Nothing out of the ordinary there. 'Favors for money,' as long as there's nothing illegal about it, is older than politics. Oh, and he didn't 'pass' the laws. The Texas legislature, representing their constituents, did that. He just signed them.

--------------------
"The best defense is not a good offense. The best defense is a terrifyingly accurate and devastatingly powerful offense, with multiply-overlapping kill zones and time-on-target artillery strikes." -- Laurence, Archangel of the Sword

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 3 pages: 1  2  3   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3