posted
So, the thing about different messages being coded differently... Does that mean that another message starting w/ the same letter as this one would not necessarily start w/ 'J' when encoded?
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
If for instance this first letter 'J' represented the letter 'X' (which it doesn't), any other message at all that started with an 'X', would also be represented in the code as a 'J'. But this though doesn't mean that all others 'J's' in the message refer to 'X'.
Confused? If this code were devised by anyone else so I would I be.
-------------------- "To the Enterprise and the Stargazer. Old girlfriends we'll never meet again." - Scotty
Printer-friendly view of this topic
