posted
Anyone ever read Trimble's Concordance? It also lists the names of episodes in other languages. The Japanese titles, translated back to English, are very funny:
The Man Trap - A Bloodsucking Monster on Planet M-113 Charlie X - A Boy from the Planet Tharsus The Enemy Within - Two Kirks Dagger of the Mind - The Lunatic from Devil's Island Miri - 400 year old girl The Devil in the Dark - Horta: The Underground Monster The Changeling - Secret of Nomad, Ultra-Small Spaceship
And my favorite: The Paradise Syndrome - Coming Close to Crash Course with an Asteroid
posted
Sensical? More like prosaic. Certainly not poetic like some of the original titles.
As for the uniforms, I'd like to see them really break with the ST past. How about some good, old-fashioned buttons and visible zippers? Nothing wrong with them, and if it ain't broke, don't fix it. Or as Dorothy might say, "buttons and zippers and snaps, oh my!"
-------------------- Never give up. Never surrender.
posted
Zippers and pockets have been confirmed in a few places. Dorothy should be happy.
-------------------- "I was surprised by the matter-of-factness of Kafka's narration, and the subtle humor present as a result." (Sizer 2005)
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
quote:Originally posted by The_Tom: Zippers and pockets have been confirmed in a few places. Dorothy should be happy.
Sources? I know about pockets, going back to the field jackets of TWoK. But while zippers were always used in the uniforms, they were always concealed to look like something futuristic. And I've never seen buttons. They used snaps, too, in the classic TWoK uniforms, but they felt the need to camouflage them with silver braid for when the jacket flaps were left open.
I want to see the real, unembellished fasteners. Again, if it still works, why not use them? What would be the advantage of some high-tech 22rd century fastener over a plain zipper? Airtightness, maybe, but that wouldn't help with a shipboard jumpsuit.
-------------------- Never give up. Never surrender.
posted
Well, unofficial reports of what the uniforms look like have swirled around for several weeks, and jumpsuits with prominent zippers and pockets has been a consistent thread. Official word confirmed these last week.
-------------------- "I was surprised by the matter-of-factness of Kafka's narration, and the subtle humor present as a result." (Sizer 2005)
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
The cadet movie uniforms also had poctets. Actually, don't some of the modern jumpsuits have combat-trouser like leg pocters?
To be fair about JMS, when his titles were good, they were good "Deconstruction of Falling Stars, Falling towards Apothesis" etc. But, by season 5, we'd gotten to the point where he'd run out of variations on "light" and "dark" and "war". I'd have trouble putting season 5 titles to episodes. Actually, I'd have slight trouble doing that to some season 4 episodes, but that is probably due to the fact that by late season 4, there were rarely individual episode stories. Still, season 5 titles were largely "The darkness in the shadows with war at night".
I do agree with faux-Echevarria about one thing. I couldn't stand that drum-beat.
-------------------- Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.
posted
About the Enterprise title, I emailed Doug Drexler as to why they omitted Star Trek from it and here's what he said...
quote:In answer to your question:
1) Star Trek: Enterprise sounds like a company that sells Trek merchandise.
-------------------- I'm slightly annoyed at Hobbes' rather rude decision to be much more attractive than me though. That's just rude. - PsyLiam, Oct 27, 2005.
Registered: May 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
Holy Sh*T! You have Doug Drexler's email address? Why don't you email him about those damn ships he drew for the DS9 Tech Manual to see if he based them on actual models he saw, or if he has photos?
-------------------- "A film made in 2008 isn't going to look like a TV series from 1966 if it wants to make any money. As long as the characters act the same way, and the spirit of the story remains the same then it's "real" Star Trek. Everything else is window dressing." -StCoop
Registered: Jun 2000
| IP: Logged
posted
I'm pretty sure that his email address has been available for a while, and that the ships were not based on models.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
In an email response I received from Okuda, the VFX department had gotten together and built several kitbashed models for the "Dominion battle aftermath." Of all the models, though, only the Centaur and the Curry were seen in the show. I had asked Mike if Drexler's drawings were based on the other unused models, since there were already two drawings which were loosely based on the Centaur and the Curry. Okuda said he thought they were.
-------------------- "A film made in 2008 isn't going to look like a TV series from 1966 if it wants to make any money. As long as the characters act the same way, and the spirit of the story remains the same then it's "real" Star Trek. Everything else is window dressing." -StCoop
Registered: Jun 2000
| IP: Logged
posted
I would guess models were involved in Drexler's drawings, but probably not the original models. After all, look at the Curry's huge nacelles. That's exactly what would happen if the model-kit Constitution-II nacelles were stuck on bits from an Excelsior model, from what I've heard. The fact that they're sideways suggests that the original model wasn't used, though, since the original clearly had them the normal way.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
Topic Closed
Printer-friendly view of this topic