posted
Yeah how did that translate across!?! Terry Farrel liked red? 1. She was Chief Science Officer. 2. I guess she does have some sort of Command position on DS9, before Worf and not including Kira, Dax was Sisko's 2nd in command. 3. Being in Engineering red on the Enterprise got her access to more areas than Science Blue?
-------------------- "Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica." - Jim Halpert. (The Office)
posted
OTOH, several scientists in TOS wore red...
The access issue may have been important, yes. Blueshirts had access to critical Engineering areas in "Alternate Factor", but not elsewhen. Unless Sisko's gang wanted to infiltrate Sickbay, they probably best dress in yellow or red. (And they already had Bashir for Sickbay recce if they needed.)
capped
I WAS IN THE FUTURE, IT WAS TOO LATE TO RSVP
Member # 709
posted
i believe that the costumer also stated that the red fabric they were using was superior in quality to the blue, therefore it was the only one of the three they thought they should use for the skirt
(this might've been their reasoning when they chose red for Historian Marla McGivers and Astrobiologist Ann Mulhall -- both of whom wore red despite their science careers).
besides, the redskirt uniform was an icon of TOS -- they probably thought it would be more nostalgic if they had a woman in a red skirt running around.
Besides, there are more than enough people who cross their department colors more than a few times throughout all the series -- its not impossible or improbable for a minor assignment change of personnel status change that could make an officer wear command instead of operations or science -- Spock, Uhura, Worf, etc -- and the few cases of captains, commodores and an admiral wearing non-command colors.
Registered: Sep 2001
| IP: Logged
posted
Besides, the DS9 crew had no position or rank at all in the TOS Starfleet, and no uniform could conceal the fact that they weren't actually crewmembers.
quote:Originally posted by machf: I think you got it the other way around - I'm saying that the Trekverse is not our universe, and asking why other people insist in trying to invent explanations to cover for all the noticeable differences between them (as, precisely, the Eugenics Wars, among other things).
Edit: (Or are you tring to imply that people is so dumb that they would understand it the other way around?)
Yes. Although I am also assuming that 90% of viewers of Star Trek do not sit there with the Chronology on their lap shouting "there were probes called Nomad launched in the 90s" in a high pitched voice.
Also, "is so dumb". Irony.
-------------------- Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
Is "people" a singular or plural noun in English? In Spanish, the equivalent "gente" is a "collective singular", not a plural...
Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged
posted
I'd like to have full access to her areas. WIN!
Besides.
-------------------- Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
Cartman
just made by the Presbyterian Church
Member # 256
posted
Your manhood is secure once again.
Registered: Nov 1999
| IP: Logged
-------------------- Yes, you're despicable, and... and picable... and... and you're definitely, definitely despicable. How a person can get so despicable in one lifetime is beyond me. It isn't as though I haven't met a lot of people. Goodness knows it isn't that. It isn't just that... it isn't... it's... it's despicable.
Registered: Mar 1999
| IP: Logged
Cartman
just made by the Presbyterian Church
Member # 256
posted
"The other hand" is right.
Registered: Nov 1999
| IP: Logged
posted
So which actress in the TOS mini is he referring to? Blalock or Farrell?
-------------------- "It speaks to some basic human needs: that there is a tomorrow, it's not all going to be over with a big splash and a bomb, that the human race is improving, that we have things to be proud of as humans." -Gene Roddenberry about Star Trek
Registered: May 1999
| IP: Logged
Topic Closed
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic