Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » Starship Sensors

   
Author Topic: Starship Sensors
Kalax
Junior Member
Member # 723

 - posted      Profile for Kalax     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Do starships sensors have definate range, or is depended upon the object. For instance, would sensor's range be X distance around the ship, or would it vary based on the size and other characteristics of the target (IE: Energy output, radiation, etc etc)?
Registered: Oct 2001  |  IP: Logged
Malnurtured Snay
Blogger
Member # 411

 - posted      Profile for Malnurtured Snay     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Possibly, unless not.

--------------------
www.malnurturedsnay.net

Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged
Timo
Moderator
Member # 245

 - posted      Profile for Timo     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Actually, we can make bolder statements than that. (And at times they can even be well-founded statements.)

It's standard practice in TNG that our lesser heroes declare "Something at extreme range, sir!" after which Picard commands "On screen..." and we get to see a fuzzy blob. Picard then says "Magnify!" and lo and behond, the image sharpens to show the minutest detail of the target.

This to me seems to indicate that the sensors are quite capable of resolving objects as small as the window of a starship at range X, but cannot be alerted to the presence of a target that small at range X unless it's attached to a larger object - say, a starship.

Thus, I'd say that inert objects are indeed first observed at distances that depend on their size (and perhaps albedo and color). And non-inert objects (say, ships at warp or operating shields or weapons) no doubt are observed at a distance proportional to the intensity of their activity: even a cruiser-sized formation of shuttles at low warp may be more difficult to see than a single cruiser at high warp. Of course, such things are highly complicated even in the real world, and subject to local conditions and stuff.

Timo Saloniemi

Registered: Nov 1999  |  IP: Logged
Bones McCoy
Member
Member # 1480

 - posted      Profile for Bones McCoy     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I think it depends on the ship. In 'Trials and Tribble-ations', we see a nice schematic of the Connie-class Enterprise's sensors, and apparently they're strongest towards the front. Don't know much about range, though... I think THAT depends on another scientific phenomenon: "Writer's convenience"

As to the type of target, we often see ships powering down to avoid detection, so it's plausible that any sort of energy output is more easily detectable than ships' component materials, for example.

--------------------
"Brave men are vertebrates: they have their softness on the outside, and their toughness in the middle"
-Lewis Carrol

Registered: Jan 2005  |  IP: Logged
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3