So thanks to the BluRays for TNG season 2, someone was able to finally make out most of the names from the Starship Deploy Status chart. Keep in mind that, like the "Conspiracy" displays, the names and registry numbers might not be exactly correct, since while the HD scenes are clearer, the text is still quite hard to make out with 100% accuracy.
USS Enterprise NCC-1701-D Jean-Luc Picard Docked at Starbase 173
USS Yamato NCC-24383 Richard McKenzie On Patrol, Sector 134, Neutral Zone
USS Constantinople NCC-43622 Richard James Special Assignment, Terraform Command
USS Wellington NCC-33821 Thomas Pucer On Patrol, Sector 130, Neutral Zone
USS Farouk El-Baz NCC-31823 Cari L. Thomas On Patrol, Sector 130, Neutral Zone
USS Hokule'a NCC-31087 Robert Metoyer Planetary Exploration, Sector 130
USS Atlantis NCC-32710 Dick Brownfield Diplomatic Mission to Alderaan
Illegible NCC-31054 Elaina Vescio Deep Space Exploration, Sector 010
USS Neil Armstrong NCC-31806 Gere LaDue Planetary Exploration, Sector 142
USS Saratoga NCC-31640 Martin Jedlicka Deep Space Exploration, Sector 002
USS Da-Teplan NCC-30087 Richard Cronn Planetary Exploration, Sector 054
USS Endeavour NCC-25330 Cosmo Genovese Deep Space Exploration, Sector 007
USS Yorktown NCC-20045 Gregory Benson Deep Space Exploration, Sector 032
USS Excelsior NCC-21445 Muriel Epstein Deep Space Exploration, Sector 034
USS Amber NCC-21335 Marian Fife Diplomatic Mission to Alderaan
USS Lexington NCC-30405 Wil Thoms Planetary Exploration, Sector 028
USS Excalibur NCC-21534 Al Smutko On Patrol, Sector 130, Neutral Zone
USS Yuri Gagarin NCC-25306 Alan Bernard On Patrol, Sector 142, Neutral Zone
Illegible NCC-30532 Peter Lauritson Under Repair, Starbase 74
USS Apollo NCC-30000 Dennis McCarthy Deep Space Exploration, Sector 002
USS Endeavour NCC-25330 Cosmo Genovese Deep Space Exploration, Sector 007
USS Yorktown NCC-20045 Gregory Benson Deep Space Exploration, Sector 032
USS Excelsior NCC-21445 Muriel Epstein Deep Space Exploration, Sector 034
Besides the Enterprise-D, there are twenty other ships on the list. The Endeavour, Yorktown, and Excelsior are repeated at the end of the list.
-------------------- "A film made in 2008 isn't going to look like a TV series from 1966 if it wants to make any money. As long as the characters act the same way, and the spirit of the story remains the same then it's "real" Star Trek. Everything else is window dressing." -StCoop
Registered: Jun 2000
| IP: Logged
posted
I'd put the Da-Teplan down as illegible as well. Every other ship name makes sense except this one.
-------------------- "Never give up. And never, under any circumstances, no matter what - never face the facts." - Ruth Gordon
Registered: Mar 2000
| IP: Logged
quote:Originally posted by Spike: I'd put the Da-Teplan down as illegible as well. Every other ship name makes sense except this one.
Unless Okuda wanted an alien-sounding name for a ship and just made it up. But yeah, you're probably right.
Also, there was some debate whether the "Amber" was actually the "Aries." I'd prefer it was Amber, if only because there wouldn't be a registry discrepancy with the Aries's known registry.
-------------------- "A film made in 2008 isn't going to look like a TV series from 1966 if it wants to make any money. As long as the characters act the same way, and the spirit of the story remains the same then it's "real" Star Trek. Everything else is window dressing." -StCoop
Registered: Jun 2000
| IP: Logged
quote:Originally posted by Fabrux: Oh yay, another registry for the Yamato.
That's the funny thing...right before "Measure of a Man" we see the Yamato and Riker says its registry is 1305-E. Then comes MOAM. Then comes "Contagion," where the ship's registry is both 71807 on a display, and 71806 on the saucer (seen when the ship explodes)
Personally, I think the Yamato on this chart is an older ship (probably an Ambassador based on its number) that was on its last mission, and the newer Yamato had been launched before the older ship was decommissioned. The fact that the ships have different captains kinda bears this out.
-------------------- "A film made in 2008 isn't going to look like a TV series from 1966 if it wants to make any money. As long as the characters act the same way, and the spirit of the story remains the same then it's "real" Star Trek. Everything else is window dressing." -StCoop
Registered: Jun 2000
| IP: Logged
quote:Originally posted by Dukhat: Then comes "Contagion," where the ship's registry is both 71807 on a display, and 71806 on the saucer (seen when the ship explodes)
That one's easy to explain. Obviously the Iconian virus was not only messing with the computer files, but it was also causing the replicators to malfunction and repainting the hull in the process.
-------------------- “Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do.” — Isaac Asimov Star Trek Minutiae | Memory Alpha
Registered: Nov 2000
| IP: Logged
posted
It's great to have this information at last! It's disappointing though -- but perhaps not unexpected -- that it contradicts most of the data we already had on those ships. And lots of it is difficult to reconcile/rationalise. Ah well, at least we know now!
Registered: Feb 2009
| IP: Logged
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
Printer-friendly view of this topic
