Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » The 11 Foot TOS Enterprise Studio Model

   
Author Topic: The 11 Foot TOS Enterprise Studio Model
Guardian 2000
Senior Member
Member # 743

 - posted      Profile for Guardian 2000     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Man.

I was looking through the amazing photo gallery of the National Air & Space Museum of the TOS Enterprise studio model and they're gorgeous, but some of the shots threw me off.

It's the nacelles. They went through all that restoration work and trouble but left the nacelles off kilter. Call it sag, droop, or what-have-you, but the nacelle bottoms are left with the bottom surface of the nacelle roughly level with the saucer, and based on early model shots that's not how she was designed or built.

In fairness, they were aiming to make her look as she did in 1967, by which time some sag had developed (especially on the port nacelle, some note). And, unless I'm mistaken, the studio model nacelle striping had been made to 'downwrap' as it went forward in later iterations, staying level even as the sag occurred . . . but that's a losable feature to fix the basic problem.

If you're gonna fix the port nacelle, why leave the sag at all? It's a bit sad.

Scroll through the images here:

https://airandspace.si.edu/collection-objects/model-starship-enterprise-television-show-star-trek/nasm_A19740668000

--------------------
G2k's ST v. SW Tech Assessment

Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
The Mighty Monkey of Mim
SUPPOSED TO HAVE ICE POWERS!!
Member # 646

 - posted      Profile for The Mighty Monkey of Mim     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Thread title should've been: "Why they're REALLY called 'warp' nacelles..."

-MMoM [Big Grin]

--------------------
The flaws we find most objectionable in others are often those we recognize in ourselves.

Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
StarCruiser
Member
Member # 979

 - posted      Profile for StarCruiser         Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
That model is over 50 years old. It was never in perfect alignment during that entire time. I suspect that part of the "sag" is actually due to a minor error in construction (doesn't take much to skew it noticeably).

They've done such a great job restoring it, I'm not bothered by a little bit of sag in the ol' girl.

Registered: Feb 2003  |  IP: Logged
Guardian 2000
Senior Member
Member # 743

 - posted      Profile for Guardian 2000     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
She was perky in '64. Not so much, later.

 -

--------------------
G2k's ST v. SW Tech Assessment

Registered: Nov 2001  |  IP: Logged
Shik
There's a million things I haven't done, but just you wait
Member # 343

 - posted      Profile for Shik     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Probably being hung from the ceiling on a downward angle for years didn't help, either.

--------------------
"I never agreed with Jefferson once—we have fought on like seventy-five different fronts. But when all is said & all is done...Jefferson HAS beliefs; Burr has none."

Registered: Jun 2000  |  IP: Logged
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2008 Solareclipse Network.

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3