Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Star Trek » Starships & Technology » Guesses about the Springfield? (Page 1)

  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   
Author Topic: Guesses about the Springfield?
Lindsly
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
According to the ST:TNG Companion, the following models of starships were present in the battle site of "The Best of Both Worlds" 2 (* denotes ship class that have been seen)-

Challenger*
Cheyenne*
Freedom*
Nebula*
New Orleans*
Niagara*
Rigel*
Springfield

From what I have observed, the kit-bashed ships were composed from parts of five classes of ships-Ambassador, Constellation, Constitution, Excelsior Galaxy. This could mean that the Springfield which is yet to be seen may be a combination, for example, of Galaxy and Ambassador. Are there ideas about how this ship looks or has anyone seen this ship?


IP: Logged
Sol System
two dollar pistol
Member # 30

 - posted      Profile for Sol System     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
The Springfield class could have been represented by one of the Excelsior study models.

------------------
"The record of my unspeakable crimes, in previous lives, in previous times, indelibly stains the pages of history."
--
They Might Be Giants


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Bernd
Guy from Old Europe
Member # 6

 - posted      Profile for Bernd     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
"Eagle-eye" Lindsly: Did you actually spot the Niagara, or do you just trust in the FF diagram to reproduce the actual model?

------------------
Brain. Brain. What is brain? (Kara the Eymorg, "Spock's Brain")
www.uni-siegen.de/~ihe/bs/startrek/


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Lindsly
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Bernd: I am afraid that my eyes are not that powerful. I trust in the FF. BTW, how is that you can see through the bow of the Shelly Class starship and project what the stern appears as?

*NCC-45617
/
/ =angle of camera

camera shows starboard bow with battle damage. the beauty shot of the ship ends when the scene switches to the bridge of the defiant leaving the stern unseen the STDS9 TM could be right or you could be right




IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Lindsly: You may not know this, but Mike Okuda says that he doesn't recall any Constitution parts being used in the TBoBW ships.

------------------
"I fart in your general direction!"
-John Cleese, Monty Python and the Holy Grail


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Lindsly
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
TSN: Mr. Okuda is wrong. When the USS Enterprise D is seen entering the battlefield, there is a shot of the secondary hull of a Constitution Class starship on the left side of the screen. This Class of ship is the only one I know of that has the four square windows about two decks above the keel. In the Enterprise A, these windows were a bluish color. I believe this is the arboreteum of this class of starship. Could this be a closeup of the USS Buran or of another class of starship we haven't seen it?
IP: Logged
Warped1701
Back from Vacation
Member # 40

 - posted      Profile for Warped1701     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I believe Frank has a good pic of that scene. *looks over at Frank*

------------------
Risk is our business! That's what this starship is all about....that's why we're aboard her!"


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
TSN
I'm... from Earth.
Member # 31

 - posted      Profile for TSN     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Okay, let me rephrase that... He doesn't think they used any Const'n parts in the kitbashes. I think that sec. hull was nothing more than, well, a secondary hull, thrown in and burned up. I don't think it was part of a larger model (except maybe the kit they got it from...).

------------------
"I fart in your general direction!"
-John Cleese, Monty Python and the Holy Grail


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Lindsly
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
TSN: Can you explain the Challenger Class ship which is described as a Constitution Variant?
IP: Logged
Aethelwer
Frank G
Member # 36

 - posted      Profile for Aethelwer     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
TSN:

For the third time:

HE SAID HE DIDN'T REMEMBER.

And I don't have any images. Go away! Well, none that show anything of use, anyway.

------------------
http://frankg.dgne.com/
Motormaster: "Megatron's in trouble!"
Dead End: "Who cares?"
Wildrider: "It looks like Starscream's defeated him!"
Dead End: "So?"


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
CaptSershek
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
May those infamous Star Trek Fact Files might produce another pretty ship like the Niagara, Challenger, Rigel and Freedom classes. Yes, I'm teasing, I'm more of a Galaxy/Nebula/Sovereign man myself.

------------------
Remember when we used to be explorers? - Capt. Jean-Luc Picard - Star Trek Insurrection


IP: Logged
Bernd
Guy from Old Europe
Member # 6

 - posted      Profile for Bernd     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
*The X-Ray Man*

Lindsly: I think you refer to the saucer-hull connection, since the Encyclopedia shows the stern shuttlebay as well.

Basically I assume that the modelers don't spend much time in making detail changes to the kitbashed models, although this were often necessary for the sake of plausibility. Take a saucer, engineering hull, and a pair (or three ) nacelles, and that's it, unfortunately.

One more thought about the Constitution secondary hull: In BoBW it's a very close shot, and this part is definitely much more detailed than the AMT kit. Could it be they used (part of) an actual studio model? Could it be the rest of the Enterprise blown up in STTSFS? Anyway, maybe we have to look for the Challenger class somewhere else at Wolf 359, and maybe we're lucky it doesn't actually have Constitution components.


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
grb
Ex-Member


 - posted            Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Maybe Okuda considers the refit enterprise and the enterprise-a as enterprise class starships? I've seen them called that a couple times before.

------------------
"How many people does it
take before it becomes
wrong? 6,000? 60,000?
How many people does it
take admiral!?!" -Ambassador
Picard during his command
of the Enterprise-E in the
Ba'ku incident.



IP: Logged
Sol System
two dollar pistol
Member # 30

 - posted      Profile for Sol System     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
But not in the Encyclopedia, which Okuda wrote and which presumably reflects his opinion on the matter.

------------------
"The record of my unspeakable crimes, in previous lives, in previous times, indelibly stains the pages of history."
--
They Might Be Giants


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
AndrewR
Resident Nut-cache
Member # 44

 - posted      Profile for AndrewR     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Is it possible one day to GET Okuda here - it'd save a lot of arguing

------------------
Alamaraine, count to four...


Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 2 pages: 1  2   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3