Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Sci-Fi » Designs, Artwork, & Creativity » Horizon/Archon Class Oddities. (Page 4)

  This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4   
Author Topic: Horizon/Archon Class Oddities.
Vanguard
Member
Member # 1780

 - posted      Profile for Vanguard     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Actually, the nacelles would REVOLVE, not ROTATE. [Smile] They're outside the axis, you see...

But, I admit, I did get the strangest image of the Voyager's nacells spinning along the yaw there for a bit.

--------------------
www.pixelsagas.com
www.jaynz.info - The Record of Star Fleet

Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
AndrewR
Resident Nut-cache
Member # 44

 - posted      Profile for AndrewR     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel Butler:

quote:
Originally posted by Fabrux:
And for Voyager. [Razz]

Kill me if you must, Flareites - I like the Intrepid class design.
I think it's main problem was that the nacelles were too small. I mean I understand they were trying to say that technology had improved to a point where they didn't need as large nacelles as the Galaxy Class... but it just aesthetically made Voyager a little 'front-heavy'.

--------------------
"Bears. Beets. Battlestar Galactica." - Jim Halpert. (The Office)

I'm LIZZING! - Liz Lemon (30 Rock)

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Daniel Butler
I'm a Singapore where is my boat
Member # 1689

 - posted      Profile for Daniel Butler     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
True, it did look a little like a duck with a big face and eeny little legs. That's what made the landing capability so...silly. They could have at least mentioned tractor beams or something holding the saucer up. (Actually they'd need that to hold the whole ship up; those little struts surely couldn't.)

Vanguard: OK...you have me beat on technicalities [Smile]

Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Vanguard
Member
Member # 1780

 - posted      Profile for Vanguard     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Actually, the 'swinging nacelles' of the Voyager only bugged me in that they ALWAYS swung to 'warp position', and were in that same 'warp position' regardless of what warp they were going.

Since impulse doesn't CARE about warp dynamics, wouldn't it have made more sense to JUST design the ship with the warp engines ALREADY in the 'warp position' and forget the swinging feature?

--------------------
www.pixelsagas.com
www.jaynz.info - The Record of Star Fleet

Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Daniel Butler
I'm a Singapore where is my boat
Member # 1689

 - posted      Profile for Daniel Butler     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I had a two-foot model of Voyager once that I built shoddily; the nacelles on the model could be swung down as well. I don't know whether that was the original intention and it just never got shown, or what.
Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
Fabrux
Epic Member
Member # 71

 - posted      Profile for Fabrux     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
As for the landing thing, surely you are away of a centre of gravity. Take your two-foot model of Voyager and balance it on your fingers in the area where the landing struts are. It will balance perfectly.

Also, in-universe, the mass of the saucer is offset by the mass of the warp coils (which are said to be the densest part of the ship).

--------------------
I haul cardboard and cardboard accessories

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Daniel Butler
I'm a Singapore where is my boat
Member # 1689

 - posted      Profile for Daniel Butler     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
They're all way on the back of the engineering hull...the thing is front-heavy. Unless the warp coils are *really* dense [Razz] Empty plastic models don't really extrapolate to full ships with stuff in them, I mean.
Registered: Jul 2005  |  IP: Logged
OverRon
Member
Member # 2036

 - posted      Profile for OverRon     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Vanguard:
Actually, the nacelles would REVOLVE, not ROTATE. [Smile] They're outside the axis, you see...

But, I admit, I did get the strangest image of the Voyager's nacells spinning along the yaw there for a bit.

Don't start talking about Intrepids and rotating nacelles or we'll have Escallum in here moaning about Nebula's and trying to talk about using pens to make fully rotating nacelles. [Wink]
Registered: Oct 2007  |  IP: Logged
Fabrux
Epic Member
Member # 71

 - posted      Profile for Fabrux     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Daniel Butler:
They're all way on the back of the engineering hull...the thing is front-heavy. Unless the warp coils are *really* dense [Razz] Empty plastic models don't really extrapolate to full ships with stuff in them, I mean.

Yes, that's the point. Really, really dense. [Wink]

--------------------
I haul cardboard and cardboard accessories

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Vanguard
Member
Member # 1780

 - posted      Profile for Vanguard     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
To be more accurate, you could spray the insides with expanding foam? Like some of the older insulation cans or something? [Smile]

--------------------
www.pixelsagas.com
www.jaynz.info - The Record of Star Fleet

Registered: Dec 2005  |  IP: Logged
Sean
First Tenor
Member # 2010

 - posted      Profile for Sean     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by OverRon:
quote:
Originally posted by Vanguard:
Actually, the nacelles would REVOLVE, not ROTATE. [Smile] They're outside the axis, you see...

But, I admit, I did get the strangest image of the Voyager's nacells spinning along the yaw there for a bit.

Don't start talking about Intrepids and rotating nacelles or we'll have Escallum in here moaning about Nebula's and trying to talk about using pens to make fully rotating nacelles. [Wink]
With traffic cones...I need a good laugh. I think I'll re-read that thread. [Big Grin]

--------------------
"Kosh, I'd like to introduce you to our Resident schmuck and his side kick Kick Me."-Ritten

"Fighting for peace is like screwing for virginity".
-George Carlin

Registered: Jul 2007  |  IP: Logged
  This topic comprises 4 pages: 1  2  3  4   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3