Flare Sci-fi Forums
Flare Sci-Fi Forums Post New Topic  Post A Reply
my profile | directory login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Flare Sci-Fi Forums » Sci-Fi » Designs, Artwork, & Creativity » Miranda Class TOS-style

   
Author Topic: Miranda Class TOS-style
The Red Admiral
Admiral on Deck....
Member # 602

 - posted      Profile for The Red Admiral     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Still work in progress, but here's an early test render alongside the refit Miranda. All conjectural of course..



--------------------
"To the Enterprise and the Stargazer. Old girlfriends we'll never meet again." - Scotty

Trekmania -My Comprehensive Trek Resource

The ASDB

Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
The Mighty Monkey of Mim
SUPPOSED TO HAVE ICE POWERS!!
Member # 646

 - posted      Profile for The Mighty Monkey of Mim     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Not bad. [Big Grin]

--------------------
The flaws we find most objectionable in others are often those we recognize in ourselves.

Registered: Jun 2001  |  IP: Logged
Masao
doesn't like you either
Member # 232

 - posted      Profile for Masao     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I think the deflection crystal is a refit characteristic, even in a more primitive form. So, I suggest a more TOS-style impulse deck. Also, the nacelle supports look too modern. Rectangular struts are older looking.

--------------------
When you're in the Sol system, come visit the Starfleet Museum

Registered: Oct 1999  |  IP: Logged
Reverend
Based on a true story...
Member # 335

 - posted      Profile for Reverend     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Nice work as always my friend.
However, I think it would be much more interesting to see a pre-refit Soyuz-Class instead of a Miranda. This relates to the theory that the Soyuz came first and were refitted along with the Constitution. The basic gist is that Mirandas were actually new builds based closely off of the refitted Soyuz model so they never were built like the original Constitutions. This would be because the old Soyuz didn't hold up as well as expected, which is why they were eventually retired but the new improved Miranda worked wonerfully which explains why the Mirandas are still in service and they Soyuz aren't.

It's just a theory but personally I'd just think A TOS Soyoz would look much better ;-)
After all, the Bozeman was originally intended to be a TOS design from what I've heard.

--------------------
Dark Knight Adventures & Batman Beyond:Stripped - DeviantArt Gallery
================================
...what we demand is a total absence of solid facts!

Registered: Apr 2000  |  IP: Logged
capped
I WAS IN THE FUTURE, IT WAS TOO LATE TO RSVP
Member # 709

 - posted      Profile for capped     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Love the model, hate the impulse crystal. could do without it, especially since its even distorted from the movie version.

--------------------
"Are you worried that your thoughts are not quite.. clear?"

Registered: Sep 2001  |  IP: Logged
Bernd
Guy from Old Europe
Member # 6

 - posted      Profile for Bernd     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Nice work. Well, we don't know exactly if the deflection crystal is so typical of TMP-style ships only. Maybe the TOS Constitution is actually the exception. But for consistency's sake, you may consider to get rid of it. Or you could move it and color it yellowish, so it would be a sensor dome.

--------------------
Bernd Schneider

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
Woodside Kid
Active Member
Member # 699

 - posted      Profile for Woodside Kid     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
quote:
Originally posted by Masao:
Also, the nacelle supports look too modern. Rectangular struts are older
looking.

Actually, Masao, from that angle, the struts look almost identical to the struts on the SoSF Surya class frigate.

--------------------
The difference between genius and idiocy? Genius has its limits.

Registered: Aug 2001  |  IP: Logged
bX
Stopped. Smelling flowers.
Member # 419

 - posted      Profile for bX     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Excellent work as usual, RA. Very impressive. No roll bar, though? Alack!

--------------------
"Nah. The 9th chevron is for changing the ringtone from "grindy-grindy chonk-chonk" to the theme tune to dallas." -Reverend42

Registered: Sep 2000  |  IP: Logged
The Red Admiral
Admiral on Deck....
Member # 602

 - posted      Profile for The Red Admiral     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Right. Well, the deflection crystal is something I played with for a while, rejected, then ultimately accepted. I myself was not sure about this in the technological sense, but I don't think it's beyond the realms of implausibility.

Reverend, I actually have a Soyuz, but it's an old model from two years ago, and is in dire need of rebuilding. It's the Bozeman-style Soyuz, a TOS Soyuz is also a possibility once I finish this Miranda, it wil be just be a case of amending and modifying the mesh.

In regards to which came first, I'm from the school of thought that says the Miranda came first, and it was of the cruiser-type. The Soyuz though (IMO) was more heavily armed Miranda variant, maybe a Heavy Destroyer, basically an offshoot of the refitted Miranda that was phased in, in perhaps the 2260's.

I speculate that there was only a very small Soyuz fleet, maybe 10 - 20 ships, and for whatever reason, during the 2270's and 80's they were all retired. Being originally TOS Miranda Classes, these Soyuz refits were pretty old anyway by this time.

The nacelle pylons on this Miranda will stay I'm afraid, I'm happy with them. Compared to the NX-01 this is still a very basic looking ship.

Bernd. I could make the crystal into a sensor dome, but I already have one on the underside of the saucer. I first put the crystal there because I wanted some feature on the aft end of the main hull.

There's a couple of other views here:
http://www.trekmania.net/art/tosmir1.jpg

http://www.trekmania.net/art/tosmir2.jpg

Also, Balaam, I think the rollbar is a refit feature, so I omitted it in this TOS version.

[ March 05, 2002, 15:14: Message edited by: The Red Admiral ]

--------------------
"To the Enterprise and the Stargazer. Old girlfriends we'll never meet again." - Scotty

Trekmania -My Comprehensive Trek Resource

The ASDB

Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Fabrux
Epic Member
Member # 71

 - posted      Profile for Fabrux     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Erm. Any particular reason there are impulse engines where the shuttlebays should be?

--------------------
I haul cardboard and cardboard accessories

Registered: Mar 1999  |  IP: Logged
The Red Admiral
Admiral on Deck....
Member # 602

 - posted      Profile for The Red Admiral     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
Yes, it was part of the whole back-engineering process from the refit Miranda back to original, ie, the speculation that the orginal Miranda Class had two separate Impulse engines, and one central shuttlebay. Newer Mirandas built to the refit specifications had it the other way round - two shuttle bays, and one central impulse unit.

--------------------
"To the Enterprise and the Stargazer. Old girlfriends we'll never meet again." - Scotty

Trekmania -My Comprehensive Trek Resource

The ASDB

Registered: May 2001  |  IP: Logged
Reverend
Based on a true story...
Member # 335

 - posted      Profile for Reverend     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post   Reply With Quote 
I'm not sure it's such a good idea to have that deflector crystal directly over the shuttlebay...at least make it smaller and a little more indented like the refit was...but not quite.

--------------------
Dark Knight Adventures & Batman Beyond:Stripped - DeviantArt Gallery
================================
...what we demand is a total absence of solid facts!

Registered: Apr 2000  |  IP: Logged
   

Quick Reply
Message:

HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.

Instant Graemlins
   


Post New Topic  Post A Reply Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3