T O P I C ��� R E V I E W
|
Curry Monster
Member # 12
|
posted
Make up your own mind: http://www.sunday-times.co.uk/news/pages/sti/2000/06/04/stifgnusa01007.html ------------------ "Remeber, if there is a nuclear explosion, be sure to close your windows as the massive heat could cause objects within your home to catch fire". Wise, wise words.
|
Nim
Member # 205
|
posted
Well, if Dr. Turok: Dinosaur Hunter supports it, I'm all for it.Actually I read in a credible science-magazine months ago that lightspeed had been exceeded. ------------------ I'm not an atheist, I'm a maybeist�
|
Curry Monster
Member # 12
|
posted
Well, bugger me. Actually on second thought, don't!------------------ "Remeber, if there is a nuclear explosion, be sure to close your windows as the massive heat could cause objects within your home to catch fire". Wise, wise words.
|
Baloo
Member # 5
|
posted
Cool! It's about time someone discovered something to knock the physicists out of their "We know practically everything" attitude. The modern physics will now have to find a new "theory of everything" to replace Einstein's theorems, just as Einstein's theorems superceded Isaac Newton's laws.Even if this doesn't lead to warp drive, it could lead to subspace radio (or at least, even faster computers than we have today). ~~Baloo ------------------ The Authors of the previous quote have been sacked. We would like to apologize for the low quality of the quote and have you ever been bitten by a m��se? http://www.geocities.com/cyrano_jones.geo/
|
Aethelwer
Member # 36
|
posted
Weird. Actually, I think Einstein did account for faster-than-light travel...I don't remember the details, though.------------------ June is National Accordion Awareness Month. "Have you heard Alanis Morisette trying to play the harmonica? She doesn't know how to play the harmonica. Well guess what, Alanis, I INVENTED the 'don't-know-how-to-play-harmonica-harmonica-solo.'" - John Flansburgh
|
TSN
Member # 31
|
posted
Actually, I read about this a couple days ago (I think the link was on Slashdot). Apparently, it wasn't that the light wave itself moved ahead at 300c. It was that the information about the wave preceded the wave itself. The cesium gas (or whatever it was, exactly) created a copy of the wave, which went out of the chamber. The creation of this copy then cancelled out the incoming wave when it arrived (borrowed energy, and all that).------------------ "This is Major Tom to ground control. I'm stepping through the door, and I'm floating in a most peculiar way. And the stars look very different today..." -David Bowie, "Space Oddity"
|
Sol System
Member # 30
|
posted
Relativity says nothing about not going faster than light. It's as simple as pie.It does, however, forbid travel AT the speed of light. Unfortunately for us, but luckily for causality, we've yet to discover a way to go from 0 to 60 without going 55, as it were. And Einstein hardly suspended Newton's laws. He merely added to them. F still equals MA, as any projectile will be willing to explain to you should you stand in front of it. This actually raises a larger question that's been floating around inside my head for awhile, but I'm still unsure how to share it without sounding completely nonsensical. Moreso than usual, that is. ------------------ "While it is true that 15% of home accidents are caused by large penis related incidents, only a small number have ever been known to be fatal." **** Read chapter one of "Dirk Tungsten in...The Disappearing Planet"!
|
Curry Monster
Member # 12
|
posted
Try us.------------------ "Remeber, if there is a nuclear explosion, be sure to close your windows as the massive heat could cause objects within your home to catch fire". Wise, wise words.
|
Jay the Obscure
Member # 19
|
posted
Yeah, I'm game....bring it on Simon.------------------ Oh, goody, the Sea Monkeys I ordered have arrived. Heh heh heh, look at them cavort and caper. ~C. Montgomery Burns And be sure to visit The Field Marshal project http://fieldmarshal.virtualave.net/
|
Sol System
Member # 30
|
posted
It's hardly a question, really. Recently some friends and I have debated about the universe and how much of it can really be understood. While I don't necessarily believe it, I've been taking on the role of devil's advocate and claiming that there are real limits to what we can know. (All without reading "The End of Science" by that one guy, who didn't write "The End of History" but did come up with an amazingly similar title.)There's more to it, but my mind slowly melts and all I can remember right now are the lyrics to this song by M Doughty. "All my limbs are sticks and lines, my head's a point upon my spine. I can't get no quadrilateral, I can't say half empty or half full now." ------------------ "While it is true that 15% of home accidents are caused by large penis related incidents, only a small number have ever been known to be fatal." **** Read chapter one of "Dirk Tungsten in...The Disappearing Planet"!
|
First of Two
Member # 16
|
posted
Doesn't modern physics already accept the possibility (albeit until now theoretical only) of objects/particles that travel faster than light?Isn't that what tachyons are supposed to be, objects that can't slow down BELOW the speed of light? Could this be our first indication of...dare I say it...subspace? ------------------ "Nobody knows this, but I'm scared all the time... of what I might do, if I ever let go." -- Michael Garibaldi
[This message has been edited by First of Two (edited June 05, 2000).]
|
Aethelwer
Member # 36
|
posted
Er, no. Tachyons have nothing to do with subspace (which is an entirely fictional concept with no grounds in real science, just a convenient plot device).------------------ June is National Accordion Awareness Month. "Have you heard Alanis Morisette trying to play the harmonica? She doesn't know how to play the harmonica. Well guess what, Alanis, I INVENTED the 'don't-know-how-to-play-harmonica-harmonica-solo.'" - John Flansburgh
|
|