Ok, so none of that is true. But I wish it were. No doubt the OPEC topic has been discussed. But could someone please remind why they decided to decrease oil production? Or why it's been tolerated so far?
------------------
Calvin: "Nothing spoils fun like finding out it builds character."
This post sponsored in part by the Federation Starship Datalink
------------------
Intelligence, Integrity, Responsibility.
Vote Bush/Cheney 2000
Ahem....moving on....
Anyway Jeff you said, "Reduce consumption..." I couldn't agree more, but how do you intend to get around:
A) The �ber large oil companies who are making huge profits off of the internal combustion engine
B) Those same �ber large oil companies lobbying Congress against any sort of regulation that would threaten the status of the internal combustion engine as number 1
C) Yuppie American materialism that includes:
1) 2 huge Ford Expeditions or 1 Expidition and on Hummer per household. The sole purpose of which is to look cool while driving and getting 5 miles per gallon of �ber large oil company gas.
2) 3 cell phones, 2 pagers, a personal air conditioner, and a TV in each room of the house. These drive up use of electricity to a huge degree. Electricty in California is by in large nautral gas produced or...you guessed it Oil produced.
Flameboard...here we come!
------------------
This is a place of business, not a peewee flopphouse!
~C. Montgomery Burns
As this is a loaded political topic, apparently, I send it to that special section of paradise we've carved out for loaded political topics: The Earth's Core!
------------------
love's function is to fabricate unknownnness
--
E. E. Cummings
****
Read chapter one of "Dirk Tungsten in...The Disappearing Planet"! And party everyday.