Flare Sci-Fi Forums: A brand quacking new website!

This is topic A brand quacking new website! in forum Officers' Lounge at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.

To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/10/1696.html

Posted by Red Quacker on :

Due to circumstances beyond my control, I have been forced to construct a website. Hopefully, those who go there will be exposed to the light of truth for a change.

Quack!
http://www.geocities.com/red_quacker/index.htm

------------------

Posted by Vacuum robot lady from Spaceballs (Member # 239) on :

In many cases, a picture is worth a thousand words.

This one is no different.

Grandma told us not to.

[Edited to show the image to the masses. Notice how the tagline is quite appropriate for the current situation.]

------------------
"I WANT A POST VOY SERIES STAR TREK ORIGINAL MESSAGE WAS LOOKING FORWARD NOT LOOKING BACK."

-Darkstar

[This message has been edited by Ultra Magnus (edited March 05, 2001).]

Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :

Dude ...

I don't think you understand. Your past history at other BBoards is irrelevent here, you can start off fresh yet you insist on bringing this dirty laundry here ... why?

------------------
Star Trek Gamma Quadrant
Average Rated 6.27 out of 10 Smileys by Fabrux (with four eps posted)
***
"Oh, yes, screw logic, let's go for a theory with no evidence!"
-Omega 11:48am, Jan. 19th, 2001
****
"The candidate who slimed John McCain in the primaries and smeared Al Gore in the general election is now the president who pledges to elevate the nation's tone and bring civility to our discorse. Kind of like Michael Corleone brought peace to the mob by killing the heads of the other four families."
--Paul Begala, Is Our Children Learning?

Posted by Vacuum robot lady from Spaceballs (Member # 239) on :

The reason shall be known to all whom are free. For thos afraid to visit the above site (IT'S NOT THE MAN TRAIN! CHOO CHOO!), it's because:

quote:
There is a conspiracy (hear me out) silently in the works. The sole purpose of this conspiracy is to systematically intimidate me into leaving all message boards and force me to submit to the will of the Corrupt Administration.

I think this explains more than even its writer meant.

Someone close this garbage.

------------------
"I WANT A POST VOY SERIES STAR TREK ORIGINAL MESSAGE WAS LOOKING FORWARD NOT LOOKING BACK."

-Darkstar

Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :

Red,

You're just a tad bit paranoid, you do realize?

Posted by Nim (Member # 205) on :

You shouldn't be this concerned with clearing your name. I used to be like you a long time ago, always getting hurt by the slightest joke aimed at me, so wanting to be accepted. And when someone argued with me I fought 'til I bled just to prove I was right.

I sympathize with you, there are so many guys and girls with a lot of intelligence and nothing to do with it. A dangerous combo when mixed with the anonymity of the net.

Did you even read my first post in your thread?

I didn't write this post to get back at you or anything, I wanted you to know that we didn't want it to be this way. But if you start quote me now and try to insult me you will take away the last bit of respect I had for you, that I have for all newcomers.

And you really don't know a forum until you've taken part of it. Watching is not the same as doing.

Posted by Dukhat (Member # 341) on :

Reading over his previous posts and now this one, it's blatantly obvious that this person is trying to instigate arguments. Either that, or he really is a paranoid delusional.

I do believe Mr. Capps told you to cease and desist.

------------------
Lisa: "Don't you remember the story of Oedipus?"
Homer: "Maybe five dollars will refresh my memory."
Lisa (angrily): "Oedipus was the story of a man who kills his father and marries his mother!"
Homer: "Uggh! Who pays for that wedding?"

Shabren's Final Prophecy: Star Trek: Legacy

Posted by The359 (Member # 37) on :

A little from column A, and a little from Column B, Dukhat.

Not only is he doing what he was SPECIFICALLY told not to do, but isn't this SPAMMING too?!

Honestly, I say pull the chord now, it is blatantly obvious this is never going to work.

------------------
"No, 3 & 6 are mandatory, so you only have to do them if you want"

Alex, fellow classmate, trying to explain an assignment (2/2/01)

Posted by Red Quacker on :

Re: JeffKarde:

---------
You're just a tad bit paranoid, you do realize?
---------

You don't understand. A TrekBBS administrator told me that *Christian* was being warned by administrators to watch out for my arrival. Originally, I thought *he* was the one orchestrating the conspiracy against me, since he banned me from TrekBBS and SlipstreamBBS. If *he* is being warned about me, who knows what else is floating around the internet. I *must* clear my name and spread the truth. Creating a crude website is my last resort.

Posted by Dukhat (Member # 341) on :

quote:
I *must* clear my name and spread the truth.

No, you mustn't. As has been stated several times, no one here gives a shit what you did in the past (except for yourself). The admin/owner of this board has twice told you to cool it, so please cool it. And yes, I know I am not an administrator.

Shabren's Final Prophecy: Star Trek: Legacy

[This message has been edited by Dukhat (edited March 05, 2001).]

Posted by Nim (Member # 205) on :

RQ: Do you know what handwriting analysis says about people writing without spacing, continuing to the edges of the paper?
Check it out sometime, you might learn something.

[This message has been edited by Nimrod (edited March 05, 2001).]

Posted by The359 (Member # 37) on :

Red...I think EVERYONE in the friggin world has better things to do then create a mass conspiracy over little YOU.

Too be quite frank, if you're gonna act like this, just leave now before you're banned.

------------------
"No, 3 & 6 are mandatory, so you only have to do them if you want"

Alex, fellow classmate, trying to explain an assignment (2/2/01)

Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :

Tell me, because I don't know Nimrod, and I am rather interested.

Posted by MinutiaeMan (Member # 444) on :

Quick question on forum policy here: Is it against the rules to post a thread devoted to your website? Is that how "spam" is defined here? If there are forums where website threads are permitted, which ones?

Thanks.

------------------
You know, you really should keep a personal log. Why bore others needlessly?
The Gigantic Collection of Star Trek Minutiae

Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :

It depends on what your website it.

For example, if your site is devoted to Starships, post it in the Starship forum. Or put it in your .sig, that's fine.

Posted by Red Quacker on :

Re: I forget who wrote this:

----------
Red...I think EVERYONE in the friggin world has better things to do then create a mass conspiracy over little YOU.
----------

If that's the case, then why is there a conspiracy against me? I cannot think of a single rational explanation for the things that I have seen, other than conspiracy. Why don't you ask Christian in a private e-mail? As long as he's sure it's not me reading it, he'll probably tell you all about it, unless there is someone even higher-ranking than him.

Posted by The359 (Member # 37) on :

ARGH, god, someone whack this boy upside the head with an intelligence stick (and no ugly sticks this time!)

There ISN'T a conspiracy against you! DUH! You're just a trouble maker, and it is the duty of the Administrators of all those boards you have been to to protect the people who come there from YOU. I'd be DAMNED glad you're getting a chance to even last a few days here, but no, Red, you are just ruining it for yourself. YOU are the cause of all these problems, wether you realize it or not.

------------------
"No, 3 & 6 are mandatory, so you only have to do them if you want"

Alex, fellow classmate, trying to explain an assignment (2/2/01)

Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :

Dear Sweet Lord in Heaven.

WE (that is, the posters at Flare) don't CARE ABOUT THE TREKBBS!

Dude, you could've joined us here at Flare. You could have been accepted. Instead, you'll probably be banned for this thread.

Posted by Nim (Member # 205) on :

Well my insight in spam-ethics seems rather misplaced now. This place has been turned into a chat-group...

[This message has been edited by Nimrod (edited March 05, 2001).]

Posted by Omega (Member # 91) on :

I cannot think of a single rational explanation for the things that I have seen, other than conspiracy.

I can think of one, RQ: perhaps you really DO break the rules, and perhaps you really ARE abraisive. Did this never occur to you? Or are you one of those annoying people like I used to be a decade ago: do you think that you're literally infallible, and that if something goes wrong, it MUST be a conspiracy? If you cause trouble, we're not going to change the entire nature of the forums to suit you, as you seem to think we should. It'd be far more likely that we'd simply get rid of you.

You get into trouble in multiple locations. Thus there is likely some common thread between the locations. I can think of two possibilities.

A) Grand conspiracy

B) You

Which is more likely to be the recurring problem?

------------------
Disclaimer:
"All references to vices and of the supernatural contained in this game are for entertainment purposes only. _Over_The_Edge_ does not promote satanisim, belief in magic, drug use, violence, sexual deviation, body piercing, cynical attitudes toward the government, freedom of expression, or any other action or belief not condoned by the authorities."
- `OverTheEdge'

Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :

High five, Omega!

Posted by Fabrux (Member # 71) on :

I just have to say this:

You're still annoying, Omega!

------------------
"Lately I've noticed that everyone seems to trust me. It's really quite unnerving. I'm still trying to get used to it."
- Garak, "Empok Nor"

Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :

Fine, Red, you want the truth?

It's not a conspiracy against you ... it's against OMEGA!

Posted by Red Quacker on :

Re: Omega

-----------
I can think of one, RQ: perhaps you really DO break the rules, and perhaps you really ARE abraisive.
-----------

Don't you think I already thought of that? But think about it. *If* I actually broke the rules (already sounding less plausible than conspiracy theory), don't you think they would ban me and *say* which rule I broke? But that's not the way it has happened. Check out some of these ban messages. They're cryptic. In the case of one site, the moderator actually admitted that *he* was breaking the rules by banning me, and that *I* had not broken any. Why would someone do something to incriminate himself like that unless he had no alternative.

This is very typical of large business organizations. An order comes from high up and the mid-level managers get stuck taking the heat. You can almost sense the resignation that Christian guy must have felt.

Posted by The359 (Member # 37) on :

You think these suckers are big corportations? They barely make $1.20 from us visiting it!

You are the problem. In case you have YET to realize, everyone here knows that except you. Therefore, you are obviously in the wrong, not us or any of the Admins.

You. Are. A. Trouble. Maker.

------------------
"No, 3 & 6 are mandatory, so you only have to do them if you want"

Alex, fellow classmate, trying to explain an assignment (2/2/01)

Posted by Red Quacker on :

The only person with an abrasive personality here is you. If you want evidence of this, I invite you to look back over your threads, which are filled with unprovoked insults.

Posted by Malnurtured Snay (Member # 411) on :

Ignore Red Quaker.

It is the key. Ignore the troll, and wait for him to be banned. He has had his chance to become a member of the Flare Community -- he chose to throw that chance away. Good for him.

Ignore the Troll.

Posted by The359 (Member # 37) on :

Insults? Attacks? They're called FACTS boy, look them up. You are a trouble maker, and I see nothing that you can tell me that will prove otherwise.

------------------
"No, 3 & 6 are mandatory, so you only have to do them if you want"

Alex, fellow classmate, trying to explain an assignment (2/2/01)

Posted by Shik (Member # 343) on :

Who the fuck is "Christian?"

Why the fuck would I care?

Let's get on a more important & worthwhile subject: me & this girl.

Ha. Pun zig. For great irony.

------------------
"Gee, the public whipping didn't quite convey their fascist culture, I need something more straightforward. Ah, leather hats!" --Nimrod, on National Socialism fashion design.

Posted by Charles Capps (Member # 9) on :

Quacker has had his registration suspended as of about five minutes from now.

quote:
IF YOU SPAM US, WE WILL SHUT YOU DOWN! If you post a spam to this BB, you will be banned, and your ISP contacted concerning abuse of their serivices. Doing that will probably get your account terminated. You have been warned. (Spam is defined as any and all of the following: advertisements for services or websites, excessive useless fluff messages, flooding, and the like)

-- the registration agreement you signed upon entering.

I'm not going to bother contacting your host or ISP, you're not worth my effort.

------------------
"Babies are squirmy, ugly, dirty, smelly, and noisy. They'd offend all five of my senses if I had any reason to lick one..."
-- TSN, 2001.01.11 23:27, PhoenixChat

Posted by Curry Monster (Member # 12) on :

When I saw this, I was hoping nobody had gotten to him yet. Bugger

------------------
Re: Russia in WWII

"Hey, we butchered Poles! Thats OK."
- DT.