This is topic Bond. James Bond. in forum Officers' Lounge at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/10/1920.html

Posted by Jeff Kardde (Member # 411) on :
 
So what's the story with this dude? He stays roughly the same age for 40 years? Different people who take on the moniker of "James Bond" to replace a retired or dead 00 agent?
 
Posted by Siegfried (Member # 29) on :
 
Basically? Yeah.
 
Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
Er, no. Or maybe yeah.

Both. And neither.

Look, at the start of (name escapes me), Roger Moore goes to Tracy (his dead wife's) grave. But she died in On Her Majesty's Secret Service, where George Lazenby played Bond.

There's also the book continuity, which is different.

But, in the films, he's *kinda* the same person. They don't tend to dwell too much on continuity though (the mention of how Bond's parents died first appeared relatively recetly in Goldeneye for instance), so it doesn't really matter.

Possible he's a time lord. We'll find out when we get to the 13th actor.
 


Posted by Jeff Kardde (Member # 411) on :
 
Any word on Bond 20?
 
Posted by Shik (Member # 343) on :
 
To be released 2002, title of "Under The Ice."

Which means they simply MUST have Bj�rk sing the theme song for this one. Ever heard her cover of "You Only Live Twice?" Fucking GORGEOUS, & I ADORE the Nancy Sinatra original.
 


Posted by MIB (Member # 426) on :
 
It's called "Under the Ice?" ok.... I thought this upcoming one will be Bond movie number #19. Oh well. Damn it! I WANT Q BACK!! *sob* Damn that f*cking car crash! *sniff* COME BACK!!!!!!

Did you know that Under the Ice will be Pierce Prosman's last Bond film? Who will replace him? I have heard rumors that it will be Robie Williams, Cuba Godding Jr. or that guy who played the Gladiator in "Gladiator."
 


Posted by The_Tom (Member # 38) on :
 
I'd think Jeff would be more concerned with M's ability to spontaneously change gender.

I've always sorta assumed that continuity runs within the series of movies with the same Bond actor but not beyond that, i.e. Goldeneye, TND and TWINE are in one universe where Bond was born in the 40s or 50s and M looks rather similar to Judy Dench, while the Moore movies are in another conceptual universe where Bond was born in the 30s and M is most decidedly male. Q's the only constant.

In any case, the Bond franchise certainly took an easier route regarding continuity than that other franchise, y'know the one that gets ripped to shreds for disregarding its continuity even though its gone above-and-beyond in creating a well-fleshed-out universe. Oh, whoops, I was on the soapbox there.

And for Bond Twenty... (hmm, I'm wondering if Bond Thirty will just drop the unique title and be called Bond XXX )I've read Michelle Yeoh will be back in a lessened capacity and the plot will involve Hong Kong gangs. *shrugs* I know Brosnan's been lobbying for some time for a trip to Ireland, so who knows. Bond script inevitably feature a minimum of three locations spread across the world. There's also some talk that Ang Lee might direct, but MGM execs are reluctant to give him the final cut. AFAIK "Under the Ice" hasn't been confirmed by anyone officialish.

As for the next Bond, the gossip mill is indeed suggesting that Brosnan will throw in the towel after 20, but no firm word on who's gonna be tapped next. (Methinks TPTB will keep word as hushhush as possible so as to avoid the Brosnan/Remington Steele scandal again.) And while the same old rumours are going that we need a black Bond or a female Bond for the new millenium, I wouldn't put too much credence in them. There is apparently some Scottish nobody guy that the Harry Knowleses of the world love to death and think is prefect for the role and IIRC he does have some officialish word behind him as being firmly in the eyes of TPTB. Wish I could remember his name.
 


Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
Regarding M changing gender: That was actually acknowledged in Goldeneye, where M states that she is relatively new, and that she doesn't consider Bond in the same golden light as her predecessor.

Or course, by TND, she thinks he's great.

There's also a picture of the original M in the Scottsh MI5 headquarters in TWINE.
 


Posted by Jeff Kardde (Member # 411) on :
 
Brosnan's not leaving, despite the rumors. The REASON for those rumors is that his contract was for four Bond films, and it'll be expired after this next flick, but Brosnan said he'd be willing to fight for the role if TPTB tried to replace him.
 
Posted by MIB (Member # 426) on :
 
oh. That's cool. I thought Prosman made a pretty good bond. As a matter of fact, one of my favorite bond movies is Goldeneye. I love that one dude. The geek named Boris. LOL.
 
Posted by Dhunter (Member # 271) on :
 
The Rumor Mill Around Bond is huge , I remember right after TWINE when the Brosnen retirement issue came up they had a list of people who were supposedly interested in the role , and yes , you thought it couldnt be done , theres a Star Trek tie in!

Our favorite little Ds9 Doctor was on that list , Alexander Sidig (SP) AKA Bashir was one of the front runners on that list , of course this was more then a year ago and I'm sure the Studio Execs are looking more at the star power of Russell Crowe then poor Alex.

In my Opinion Russell Crowe doesnt fit the bond bill , hes a beefy guy , not really a suave agent.
But he is a good actor and hes shown the ability to change for a role so maybe we'll be surprised.
 


Posted by Dr. Obvious (Member # 271) on :
 
Hmmm , i like this new Flare , Go CC

Maybe I'll bump up my usage of this board from the occasional showing my ugly head , to a frequent showing of my ugly head.
 


Posted by Jeff Kardde (Member # 411) on :
 
How THAT relates to Bond, I've no clue.

Here's my beef about Crow: isn't he Australian? I kind of like the idea of each James Bond being played by a British actor.
 


Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
I can't see it myself. Crowe is, perhaps, slightly too famous. And the next Bond will almost certainly be British, although, to be fair, an Autralian has a greater chance than an American.
 
Posted by Nimrod (Member # 205) on :
 
Well, he's from New Zealand, actually. But he's lived enough in Australia to have a bit of both in his accent, I suppose.
By the time of "Romper Stomper" he sounded New Zealandish, that much I know. *shivers*

I don't think he has enough "movie grace", but then neither had Dalton.
 


Posted by Daniel (Member # 453) on :
 
Hasn't M always been played by a new person every third movie or so? (Except in Judi Dench's case I believe.) There was one of the older ones I remember where Bond says something like "I believe your predecessor kept a healthy supply of brandy in that credenza."
 
Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
No. M was played by the same actor for the first dozen or so movies. He died, and was replaced for the last couple of Moore ones, and the Dalton ones. Dench has been M dor all of Dalton's.

The two different male M's were supposed to (I believe) be the same character. Dench's M is obviously not.
 


Posted by MIB (Member # 426) on :
 
All I care about is that they get a half way decent actor who can at least pass for being a Brit to play Bond! LOL. Although. If the guy who originally played Q gets replaced by a dude who is supposed to be playing the SAME Q, I may have to start doing very bad things to the movie companies....... If he is meant to be a different Q, I would mind.........as much, but Q was a legend as far as I'm concerned. R should fill Qs shoes from now on and the role of Q should be retired.
 
Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Er, wasn't that the whole point of that scene? Whatisname Whatisname retired in, uh, whatever the last one was.

I think Crow would make an excellent Bond.


 


Posted by MIB (Member # 426) on :
 
I can't see Crow as Bond. I really can't.
 
Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Oh, clever. On the Cleverometer, that get's at least an 8, maybe 8.3. To you I say: Clever!
 
Posted by Dr. Obvious (Member # 271) on :
 
LOL

Na I dont Crow playing bond either , they already experimented with robots as Bond , remember Timothy Dalton?

yeah i know , that was bad , i'll go somewhere else now...
 


Posted by MIB (Member # 426) on :
 
Oh come now! Tim Dalton wasn't that bad! As a matter of fact, The Living Daylights is one of my favorite Bond movies. He may seem like a robot because the 2 movies he was involved with had a far more serious tone to them and not nearly as much humor.
 
Posted by Jeff Kardde (Member # 411) on :
 
Liam!

Dench was in NONE of the Dalton flicks!

Actually, one thing I really like about "Tommorow Never Dies" is the interplay between M and Admiral Roebuck -- although I wasn't aware of this until just a few months ago, apparently the two actors star in a sitcom which airs on PBS here in the States every now and then.

Speaking of which, "TND" is my favorite of the Bond flicks. Especially that amazing opening scene -- WOW! That was done SO well! And that BMW -- !!!!
 


Posted by The_Tom (Member # 38) on :
 
I don't think Mr. Brosnan would like very much to be called British...
 
Posted by Da_bang80 (Member # 528) on :
 
I miss Q, i wish he was still around. but he was probably going to retire soon anyway. he looked OLD. as for Bond 30, i would really like to see it go way past 30. mayby to 40.
and maybe james bond is like austin powers. maybe he gets frozen, then gets thawed out every time the would needs saving. then when he's done, he goes back into the freezer.

anyone played the World Is not Enought N64 game? i think it really sucked compared to Rare's goldeneye and Perfect Dark.
 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Out of curiosity, putting aside the whole national origin of Mr. Brosnan issue (a fact wholely and blissfully outside the realm of my knowledge), how does one refer to U.K. citizens who do not happen to be British?

Also, why is there an apostrophe in "get's"? I do not know.
 


Posted by Vogon Poet (Member # 393) on :
 
If he's from the Republic of Ireland, then he's not a UK citizen. If he has taken UK citizenship, then he is British.
 
Posted by Nimrod (Member # 205) on :
 
I say Jude Law!

John Cleese was pretty bad as R, he's gone sooo soft after about "Clockwise", he's totally lost the cynicism, sarcasm and irony of his Monty Python years and "Fawlty Towers"...
"Fish called Wanda" was pretty good, but he had started his conversion into gullible-cuddly-old-man then...

All IMO, naturally.
 


Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
"Dench was in NONE of the Dalton flicks!"

BROSNAN! BROSNAN!

Damn my wandering brain.

Yeah, part of the point of Q's final scene in The World is Not Enough was that is could be used as a "retiring" scene. Lewellyn did state however, shortly after, that he'd continue playing Q as long as he could. Which fate no doubt took to be a challenge.
 


Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
BTW, Brosnan was born in County Meath in Ireland (I assume the Republic, but I'm not sure), but moved to England at a young age. Which explains his lack of accent normally, but his ability to put on a fairly convincing Irish one.

I dunno if he minds being called "British". You'd have to ask him.
 


Posted by Jeff Kardde (Member # 411) on :
 
I didn't even KNOW Lewellyn had died until just shortly -- car accident? Jesus!

However, Cleese will probably be "Q" in the next flick. Simply because, it's "Q" branch, and the head of "Q" branch is "Q", much as the head of MI-6 is "M." If one "M" or "Q" dies, then another person becomes "M" or "Q" and takes their place. Judi Dench is "M", not "N" ... or, actually, since she's the third "M", she'd be "O".

So, Cleese will be "Q" in the next flick. I point out that Bond nicknamed Cleese "R" -- "if you're Q, is he R?" -- and that we don't know if it's an official MI-6 moniker ... although, if "Q" is for "Quartermaster", "R" could be for "Replacement" ... or for "Bumbling Moron" but then we'd call him "B" and not "R", right?
 


Posted by MIB (Member # 426) on :
 
processing.......processing.......30% complete....40%.......60%........80%.......90%......Yeah! I guess that sound right Jeff. I think.
 
Posted by Dr. Obvious (Member # 271) on :
 
Dalton was ok , but personally i dont like his movies as much as I like the Connery and Moore movies , humor is one of those things that come along with Great Car , 2 Great Chicks and Stunts to make a bond flick.

The Living Daylights was probley the best out of the Dalton films , that chase sence in the was great and Bond and his girl in the cello case that was great. Plus Aha (That Euro band with the take on me song) did the theme , its one of my favs next to Goldeneye and Duran Duran's a Veiw to a kill.

BTW , M is a designation for the head of MI6 I think in the Bond movies, so I wouldnt be surprised if apon retirement someone got "promoted" to M , maybe Dench was a 00 Agent before and has been selected to desk duty. Who knows maybe Bond could get offered the M position.

Oh , and i did some research (Can you say to much time on my hands?) There have been 3 M's , unfortunatly I'm to lazy to type it here and i figure i might as well cut out the middle man so goto

http://www.007database.com/allies.html

Very kick ass site.

[ June 27, 2001: Message edited by: Dr. Obvious ]
 


Posted by Dr. Obvious (Member # 271) on :
 
Oh , upon further research I found an entire website devoted to Bond 20 Speculation

http://www.geocities.com/bluehazemovies/bond20/

and another little nugget

http://www.mi5.gov.uk

The Official Homepage of the UK's Intelligence Service , very cool site.

Even has a break down of its budget.
 


Posted by Jeff Kardde (Member # 411) on :
 
"M" wasn't a 00 agent -- in "GoldenEye", Bond & Tanner discuss her, and Tanner refers to her as an "accountant" ... seems to me, TPTB in the British government appointed someone from outside the agency to run it.

I don't think we'll ever see Bond being offered or accepting the "M" position. I mean, for one thing, he's way to good at his job. How many Double-Oh agents have died in all the films? 006 in "GoldenEye" (albeit by 007), a Double-Oh agent in "TWINE", a whole bunch in one of the Dalton ones, methinks ...

Oh, one other thing -- the black MI-6 dude, "Charlie", I think -- was he in any other Bond flicks besides "TND" and "TWINE"? Not the actor neccessarily, but the character. Just wondering, b/c, I think he's a pretty cool dude, and I would think HE would be the next "M".

[ June 27, 2001: Message edited by: Jeff Kardde ]
 


Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
As a point, Bond works for the SIS, which is MI6 (although that was aknowledged until recently. Hell, in Dr No, he worked for the non-existent MI7). MI5 is internal. Bond is not suppossed to operate within the British Isles. He does though, anyway.

That black dude was only in the last two films. Tanner's only been in a few, hasn't he? I know the current actor was in Goldeneye and TWINE, and there was a replacement character in TMD that was also in TWINE.

If you're interested, pick up The Bond Files by Andy Lane and, er, someone. I dunno how easy it'll be to find in the US, but it's a nice little unauthorized pocket book full of interestingf facts and reviews on the books, films, comic strips, and other gunk. It goes right up to TWINE.
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
For the uninformed, here's a rundown of the people who work at the agency Bond works for:


 


Posted by MIB (Member # 426) on :
 
LMAFO!!!! Yep. That pretty much sums it up!

I pity the fool who don't use 1-800-collect!!!!!
 


Posted by The359 (Member # 37) on :
 
In "On Her Majesty's Secret Service", after the chase between Lazenby's Aston Martin DB-S and the chic's Mercury Cougar XR-7, Lazenby steps out of the car and says "This never happened to the other guy", obviously meant to mean Sean Connery. This I believe makes it that "James Bond" is actually a namesake taken by these guys, as well as the entire history. I mean, if these guys are spies, and super-spies at that, then you'd think they'd get a whole big back-history to their alias, so this would include Bond's wife and his parents and whatnot.
 
Posted by Omega (Member # 91) on :
 
Which of course raises the question of what happened to the former Bonds. Perhaps they're NOT really that good, and we just see the movies where OTHER agents die.
 
Posted by Jeff Kardde (Member # 411) on :
 
Or perhaps it's all a father-son business
 
Posted by Shik (Member # 343) on :
 
Anyone ever read "Night Probe!" by Clive Cussler? there's mention of an ex-MI6 agent by the name of Brian Shaw...he becomes an integral part of the plot. There's also the inference that he is indeed James Bond.
 
Posted by Nimrod (Member # 205) on :
 
JeffK: 009 in the beginning of Octopussy.
In "The living daylights" about three agents were killed in the beginning, I think. They weren't necessarily Double-O agents, maybe just field agents backing up the super spies.

And after Dalton had killed the man that killed his pals, he parachuted down on a boat with a rich girl and boned her. That's a nice change of pace, that is.
Talk about not being emotionally involved with one's work. Maybe it's like therapy for him.
 


Posted by Vogon Poet (Member # 393) on :
 
It was two 00 agents killed at the beginning of TLD. Only three agents participated in that exercise, 007 being the third. I think Bond also recovers something from a 00 agent's body at the beginning of "View to a Kill." What is it about despatching 00 agents at the start of Bond films?
 
Posted by Nimrod (Member # 205) on :
 
For the same reason as "first girl he sleeps with gets killed". Most often for betraying the evil boss that she works for, sometimes just so Bond gets an excuse for killing everyone.
 
Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
"In "On Her Majesty's Secret Service", after the chase between Lazenby's Aston Martin DB-S and the chic's Mercury Cougar XR-7, Lazenby steps out of the car and says "This never happened to the other guy", obviously meant to mean Sean Connery. This I believe makes it that "James Bond" is actually a namesake taken by these guys, as well as the entire history. "

The only problem with that is that later on, whe Lazenby goes to his office, he looks at a load of momentoes from previous films, as if they mean something to him. Which they wouldn't, if Connery's Bond was a different person.

Of course, he shouldn't actually have any of the momentoes he's got, but still...

And in any case, it doesn't explain Connery coming back for one final film. And why he's chasing down Blofeld for the murder of Tracy too. I can't see that he retired, then heard that his replacement's wife was shot, and then took it upon himself to avenge her death. Besides, Blofeld doesn't comment that Bond looks different. Of course, Blofeld himself looks different, so that doesn't hold up...
 


Posted by Vogon Poet (Member # 393) on :
 
And then later the Moore version goes to visit Tracy's grave, and is attacked by Blofeld even though ols Ernst Stavro could have no possible grudge against this Bond. Nope, it was just a little off-the-cuff remark intended to put cinemagoers at ease when faced with a new Bond after 5 films with Connery.

Nest thing you know we'll be talking about the canonicity of the Bond universe. 8)
 


Posted by Jeff Kardde (Member # 411) on :
 
The Bond universe is canon to Highlander.

Consider! In TWINE, MI6's Scotland headquarters ... is in Glenfinnen, on the Shores of Loch Shiel. It's the castle Connor MacLeod was born in, and although we never see Duncan there, it's a good bet he knows where it is.
Looks like MI6 bought it from the MacLeods!

Also, in one of Highlander's 5th season episodes, "The Ransom of Richie Redstone", in a flashback to a casino in France in the 1970's, MacLeod greets a character whom it is strongly hinted is "Bond, James Bond."
 


Posted by Vogon Poet (Member # 393) on :
 
I'll go for that, especially if it stops them ever considering Adrian-bloody-wooden-actor-Paul as Bond.
 
Posted by MIB (Member # 426) on :
 
Aren't we straying from the topic a bit? Anywho. I just don't pay any attention to the different bonds and such.
 
Posted by Nimrod (Member # 205) on :
 
No? I suppose you devote your full attention to all the scores and results of baccarat the Bonds have played, eh?
 
Posted by Jeff Kardde (Member # 411) on :
 
Actually, I disagree with that assessment of Adrian Paul's acting ability. And I think he'd make a great Bond ... and it would explain why Bond has survived so long
 
Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Perhaps the Bond universe is coincident w/ the Doctor Who universe. That would explain the different actors... :-)
 
Posted by Wes1701E (Member # 212) on :
 
the thing is, a lot of you are thinking of Bond in the star trek continuity type. thats just not how it is-- the characters are the same person, played by diffrent actors across diffrent timeframes. Bond doesnt age because Bond doesnt age, theres not supposed to be a reason, its just how it is.

Q's replacement is R, according to TWINE dialouge and the end credits of the film.

and IMO, Brosnan is the best bond yet.
 


Posted by Jeff Kardde (Member # 411) on :
 
Erm. Wes, you must not have paid much attention to the TWINE dialogue to think that "R" will take over "Q"-branch.

For one thing ... if Mr. Lewelyn HADN'T died, he would be back as Q in #20. The ONLY reason "R" was there is because Lewelyn had been pushing TPTB to give him an assistant for quite some time.

Second of all, "R" was never shown to be Cleese's official designation. Bond made an offhand remark, "if you're Q, does that make him 'R'?" No one refered to Cleese as "R" ... "R, come here; R, do that..." He was listed as "R" in the credits because that was Bond's joke.
 


Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
"Perhaps the Bond universe is coincident w/ the Doctor Who universe. That would explain the different actors... :-)"

Er, Tim, I've already done that one.

Honestly, admins today. Useless, eh?
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Apparently I missed it. I still don't see it, actually...
 
Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
Third post, first page:

"Possibly he's a time lord. We'll find out when we get to the 13th actor."
 


Posted by Wes1701E (Member # 212) on :
 
I personally bet you $5 that 'R' will be in the next movie and be called 'R'.

When I first saw the movie, I got the impression that R was taking over eventually, and that may have been Q's final scene. Now I know for sure, dont you find it odd that Q's scene in TWINE had certain closure to it? Then the actor dies in a car crash?
 


Posted by Jeff Kardde (Member # 411) on :
 
Are you seriously trying to suggest that the producers of the Bond films assassinated Desmond Lewelyn so that they could give John Cleese a bigger role in the next film?

Cleese will be in the next film, certainly. But he was in TWINE because Lewelyn had been pestering the producers to give him an assistant for quite a few years. While certainly Cleese was being groomed to take over for Lewelyn, I think the producers and various PTB were expecting Lewelyn to be in film 20 as well -- in fact, if he hadn't died, he would've been.

Now, as to what Cleese will be called ... okay, Wes, did you even SEE TWINE? I doubt it, because you apparently operate on the assumption that "R" was Cleese's character's name. IT WASN'T. When was he called "R"? When Bond says to Q, "if you're Q, does that make him R?" Aside for that, no one calls him R. He does not call himself R. For all we know, he is "S" (for Slow, or Stupid).
 


Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
Sorry Jeff, while you are tecnically right, the fact that he was credited as "R", the only name he was given was "R", and that in all interviews, merchandise, and official gump, he was called "R", tends to indicate that he'll be called "R" in the next film.

I do agree that there's a possibility he'll be called "Q", but then they might also keep that, er, name empty, to honour Major Boothroyd and Llewelyn.
 


Posted by Jeff Kardde (Member # 411) on :
 
Well, then, are going to re-name it "R"-branch?

Always seemed to me Q was Q because he was the head of the Quatermaster Branch (Q-Branch, for short). Just as the person in charge of MI-6 is called M.
 


Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
 
Liam: Ah... See, knowing nothing about "Doctor Who" other than the fact that he time travels in a phone booth and has been played by forty-two different actors, I had no idea what a "time lord" was, so my eyes kind of skipped over that...
 
Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
Fair enough. For a boring (but short!) explanation, the Doctor (who isn't called Dr Who. He isn't. Ever.) is from Gallyfrey. Which isn't a gay Irish club, but a planet.

Time Lords, when their body receives a traumatic shock or somesuch, rather than dying, have the ability to regenerate their bodies. This results in them looking different. And having slightly different personalities. It also allows a TV show to last 30 years. It also allows the BBC to deceide that one of the biggest sci-fi shows ever, that's been successfully sold all over the world, and that makes the BBC a shit load of money in merchandise and other stuff, isn't worth making. So the cancel it. Bastards.

Er, anyway, a Time Lord can only regenerate 12 times. So he can have 13 bodies. The Doctor's have been:

William Hartnell
Patrick Troughton
Jon "Worzel Gumage" Pertwee
*all dead*
Tom Baker (who's probably getting nervous. But he was in the remake of Randell and Hopkirk. And he rules)
Peter Davison
Colin Baker (who isn't related to Tom)
Sylvester McCoy (who was good. Honest).
and, in the film, Paul McGann.

Fun, no?
 


Posted by Jeff Kardde (Member # 411) on :
 
Now that I think about it, I do think each actor's "Bond" is a completely different character. As for what happened to Connery's Bond, you only have to look so far as "The Rock."

For those of you who haven't seen this flick, after Alcatraz (known afectionatly as "The Rock") is siezed by vengeful US Marines, the FBI recruits John Mason -- a Federal prisoner -- to help liberate the island. Mason is a British national who has been imprisoned by the US Government for nearly 30 years after he stole, and hid, microfilm detailing "national security" secrets of the US Gov't: who killed JFK, the truth about Roswell, etc.

Anyway, Mason, SAS, was sent by the British government to get the microfilm. He escaped from Alcatraz: the only person to do so.

It could work ...
 


Posted by Wes1701E (Member # 212) on :
 
ok... you didnt get me. I know no one actually called him R. i own all the films on DVD, ive seen TWINE plenty of times to know this. IM SAYING that i bet he will be called R in the next one to make things easier on the audience.
 
Posted by MIB (Member # 426) on :
 
Yeah, I have seen The Rock. At first I thought the movie was gonna suck, but in the end it turn out to be pretty ok.

Wes1701E: You have all the bond films on DVD? cool! Your lucky man. I wish I had the cash to get all those movies on DVD. As a matter of fact, I wish I had the cash to get a DVD player!
 


Posted by Jeff Kardde (Member # 411) on :
 
Wes: Ah, my mistake then. I think it would be a mistake to call Cleese anything BUT "Q" for the reasons mentioned above.
 
Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
Pshaw. They should get John DeLancie to play Q.

Wouldn't THAT drive some people insane?
 


Posted by Jeff Kardde (Member # 411) on :
 
Oh dear god ...
 
Posted by MIB (Member # 426) on :
 
Oh!!! The irony!!!!!!
 
Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
Yes! Because no-one (NO-ONE) thought of that joke about, ooh, 12 years ago!

Wouldn't it be funny if Lando was played by a fat bloke with peacock hair! And Londo was played by smooth talking Billy Dee Williams!

LAUGH!
 


Posted by Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
quote:
Sorry Jeff, while you are tecnically right, the fact that he was credited as "R", the only name he was given was "R", and that in all interviews, merchandise, and official gump, he was called "R", tends to indicate that he'll be called "R" in the next film.
You both LOSE! [Smile]
 
Posted by The Mike from C.A.P.T.A.I.N. (Member # 709) on :
 
in geological time, a year and a half is an insignificant portion of an eyeblink.

but in internet time, entire online cultures can rise in fall in the length of that five hundred days. its an awful long time to hold onto an 'i told you so'

congrats.

THE FALLEN:
Napster
All Your Base
TouristGuy
Terrible Secret of Space
Audiogalaxy
 
Posted by Proteus (Member # 212) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Wes1701E:
ok... you didnt get me. I know no one actually called him R. i own all the films on DVD, ive seen TWINE plenty of times to know this. IM SAYING that i bet he will be called R in the next one to make things easier on the audience.

I lose. I like Q better anyway.
 
Posted by Hobbes (Member # 138) on :
 
I don't think that each time a new actor takes up the Bond character it means it's a new person using that identity. Nor do I think that "this never happened to the guy" line was meant to imply different people, just simply an in-joke. Just like Sean Connery's reference in The Rock was an in-joke to his Bond movies.

I think Bond is Bond, the same guy. Granted his age has varied for 40 years. I guess it's up to your own opinion.

And if anyone should be M it should be Sean Connery. A tip of the hat to his days as 007.
quote:
IMDB:
According to television news reports on 11 Nov. 2002, Sean Connery filmed a cameo as James Bond's father. However, when it was realized that GoldenEye (1995) and the Ian Fleming novels had established that Bond was an orphan, it was necessary to cut the scene to maintain continuity.


 
Posted by Nimrod Pimding (Member # 205) on :
 
After all zis time, I still don't think Russell Crowe should ever play Bond.

I don't think it's prestigous anymore to be Bond, and Crowe has always been a cool badass, he was great in "Virtuosity", that's as far as I think he should be funny, that is sadism-funny, Pacino-funny.

If he would be Bond, he would be forced by the director to be pompous.

I think Crowe should stick to the Eastwood-side of 'cool', not the Bond/Ace Ventura-side, i.e smartass.
 
Posted by Nimrod Pimding (Member # 205) on :
 
That, and he's low barytone. All the Bonds have been high barytones. I think.
 
Posted by LOA (Member # 49) on :
 
I've never seen a Bond movie. Ever. Not a one.

But the boy has decided that in light of the new movie coming out, this must change... so, apparently, we're going to have a Bond movie-fest, then go see the new movie..... Lord, help me... It's going to be something to remember, I'm sure....
 
Posted by The Mike from C.A.P.T.A.I.N. (Member # 709) on :
 
characterization FYI: there is a great distance between delivering sly double entendres over a martini, and bending over and making it look like your butt cheeks are talking. i wouldnt group those two together.
 
Posted by Nimrod Pimding (Member # 205) on :
 
Naturally I meant those two characteristics as common ground, myes. :-)
 
Posted by Fleet-Admiral Michael T. Colorge (Member # 144) on :
 
I'm confused... what's wrong with Bond?
 
Posted by LOA (Member # 49) on :
 
Nothing's wrong with Bond, as far as I know... I just don't particularly want to watch it.....

BTW: Sat is the day, and apparently we're only watching "the world is not enough" and "goldeneye"... then we'll go see the new one..... whoo, hoo.
 
Posted by Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
Well at least watch them in order! "Goldeneye", and THEN "The World Is Not Enough." And why not "Tomorrow Never Dies"?
 
Posted by LOA (Member # 49) on :
 
I'm sure we WILL watch them in order, and I forgot tomorrow never dies....

Plans may be cancelled though if I have to kill The Boy.... he's kinda sorta 'bout ready to cross over the line and into the Wrath of LOA...... watch out world..... :-P
 
Posted by Snay (Member # 411) on :
 
Uh-oh. What'd he do? Forget to make your chicken n' noodle soup?
 
Posted by LOA (Member # 49) on :
 
Men are users and abusers... pleh.

I'll explain more later....
 
Posted by PsyLiam (Member # 73) on :
 
And women are manipulative bitches.
 
Posted by Omega (Member # 91) on :
 
"God almighty made 'em to match the men!"
-Mark Twain
 


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3