T O P I C ��� R E V I E W
|
EdipisReks
Member # 510
|
posted
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns99992796 discuss amongst yourselves.
|
Da_bang80
Member # 528
|
posted
"While the peak moves faster than light speed, the total energy of the pulse does not. This means Einstein's relativity is preserved, so do not expect super-fast starships or time machines anytime soon."
Suck it yourself! HA!
|
EdipisReks
Member # 510
|
posted
it was called "using a flashy title to get attention". i wasn't expecting you to understand. move along, move along.
|
Siegfried
Member # 29
|
posted
I, for one, cringe at the thought of Albert Einstein giving me oral gratification. I shall not sleep tonight.
|
Capped In Mic
Member # 709
|
posted
Well, I for one expect super-fast starships anyway. Just because I think they can and aren't trying hard enough.
BTW, Photoshop artists now know how to disturb Siggy... hahaha. im thinking of a great composition.. I'll call it 'The Theory of Fellativity'
|
Ritten
Member # 417
|
posted
Mike, please post spoilers for that one....
|
E. Cartman
Member # 256
|
posted
Please don't. I like my theories immaculate.
Also (1), fotons can't transfer *information* at speeds greater than c. Unless we're talking quantum entanglement, but that's a whole 'nother mother.
Also (2), group velocity of a pulse can exceed c. Nothing new or groundbraking about a phase-shift occuring at superluminal speed... [ September 17, 2002, 05:50: Message edited by: E. Cartman ]
|