T O P I C ��� R E V I E W
|
Daniel Butler
Member # 1689
|
posted
Oh this is just cool. I look forward to something like this being commercially available.
|
Sean
Member # 2010
|
posted
Interesting. It will probably be massively expensive when it comes out, if it comes out, but it is an interesting idea none the less.
|
bX
Member # 419
|
posted
Did you scroll down? We'd need new LEDs or 4000 kilo weights to make it actually work.
|
Ritten
Member # 417
|
posted
If you scroll down further the 'inventor' admits the concept is fully flawed.
|
TSN
Member # 31
|
posted
Well, not the concept. The concept works fine. As long as you have LEDs that are way more efficient than the ones that exist today.
|
Doctor Jonas
Member # 481
|
posted
LEDs, or an alternative, just like the one published on Slashdot today:
http://news.zdnet.com/2422-13568_22-192842.html (it's a one-minute video, so you know)
I grant you it's only a 2-to-1 improvement against LEDs, but seems they are on the right track.
|
Fabrux
Member # 71
|
posted
Wow, that's friggin bright.
|
Sean
Member # 2010
|
posted
That might be a distraction to drivers at night. It would ruin their night vision, wouldn't it?
|
Fabrux
Member # 71
|
posted
No more so than current street lamps. Or LED traffic lights. The green light on those is uber-bright. I can't look directly at it.
|
Daniel Butler
Member # 1689
|
posted
I'm sure something like this *will* be *eventually* available. If not gravity-powered, then with wireless power (go MIT! Get it done!) or something. Anyway, what with OLEDs and nanoscale manufacturing and so on I'm sure we'll have LEDs that are efficient enough within 10 years.
It is 14*C/40*F outside and *pouring* snow...
|