When they market a light bulb as long lasting, I don't think they mean this long. Posted by Ritten (Member # 417) on :
The city calculate the costs of using such an inefficient bulb and replace it now.
Posted by Sean (Member # 2010) on :
quote:Originally posted by Ritten: The city calculate the costs of using such an inefficient bulb and replace it now.
That sounded kind of like the poorly translated directions to a cheap chinese lead paint covered toy.
I wonder how much longer the bulb will hold out.
Posted by Ritten (Member # 417) on :
Yeah, that is kind of bad, ah, well, life continues.
Posted by Jason Abbadon (Member # 882) on :
Some fucko will undoubtedly try to smash the thing due to the publicity. Kinda shows how things used to be made- with the idea of the product working constantly untill failure- today everything starts out with a idea that it will be replaced with something better.
Posted by Daniel Butler (Member # 1689) on :
The price of exponential progress. Ah, singularity.
Posted by B.J. (Member # 858) on :
They visited that firestation on Mythbusters sometime last year. I forget what they were there for, though.
Posted by Sean (Member # 2010) on :
I think it was the one where they tested whether or not leaving a light bulb on is more efficient than turning it on and off.