T O P I C ��� R E V I E W
|
Daniel Butler
Member # 1689
|
posted
...if they land in 2063 I might be alive to see it...
|
MinutiaeMan
Member # 444
|
posted
Er, Vulcan is at 40 Eridani A, not Epsilon Eridani. (I'd link to it, but for some stupid reason UBB won't allow a parenthesis in a URL!)
code:
http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Vulcan_(planet)
The system mentioned in the article in question is instead the location of Epsilon 3.
|
Daniel Butler
Member # 1689
|
posted
Aw. Man. Epic. Fail. Seriously.
|
Mars Needs Women
Member # 1505
|
posted
LOL, Your not the only one!
|
HopefulNebula
Member # 1933
|
posted
His not the only one what?
|
Reverend
Member # 335
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by Mars Needs Women: LOL, Your not the only one!
Well what's 6.3 light years between friends?
|
Kosh
Member # 167
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by Mars Needs Women: LOL, Your not the only one!
Not only did they get it wrong, I got an add for "Waterworld" with the story. Nice tie in with the Epic Fail.
|
The Ginger Beacon
Member # 1585
|
posted
quote: Originally posted by MinutiaeMan: Er, Vulcan is at 40 Eridani A, not Epsilon Eridani. (I'd link to it, but for some stupid reason UBB won't allow a parenthesis in a URL!)
code:
http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Vulcan_(planet)
The system mentioned in the article in question is instead the location of Epsilon 3.
They do mention that in the Trekmovie.com article Epsilon Eridani and 40 Eridani A are both the potential location of Vulcan.
They also hit on the fact that 40 Eridani is a trinary system - A is a regular, if chilly, K type star, but B is a white dwarf, and C is a red dwarf. You could have a planet there, but it would have to contend with some serious shit from B and C wouldn't it?
|