This is topic The Latest on Cultural Amalgamation in forum The Flameboard at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/11/435.html

Posted by Dane Simri (Member # 272) on :
 
Hey, I'm not the only one who thinks that a global human culture is imminent! Read this from a story on CNN.com about the keynote sermon preached to Muslims as part of the Hajj:

"From Mina the pilgrims went to the Grand Mosque at Mecca, where they circled seven times the cube-shaped Kaaba that Muslims around the world turn to when praying.

"It was there that Sheikh Abdel Rahman al-Sudais, at times choking back tears of emotion, urged the world's Muslims to unite and shun Western traditions and materialism.

"Warning that 'globalization' could lead to 'Western domination of the Islamic nation,' he called on God to bless Muslims and destroy the enemies of Islam.

"'Oh God destroy the aggressors, the Zionists (Israelis)... Save al-Aqsa Mosque (in Jerusalem) from the claws of Zionists and Jews,' he said."

Is al-Sudais merely fueling the fires of fanatacism, or is cultural "globalization" a fact of our collective life?


[Edited to correct a spelling error, bah!]
------------------
Dane

"Mathematicians have long held that a million monkeys banging on a million keyboards would eventually reproduce the collected wisdom of the human race. Now, thanks to the internet, we know this is not true." -- Robert Silensky

[This message has been edited by Dane Simri (edited March 16, 2000).]
 


Posted by Harry (Member # 265) on :
 
WE ARE THE BORG! RESISTANCE IS FUTILE!

------------------
"When You're Up to Your Ass in Alligators, Today Is the First Day of the Rest of Your Life."
-- Management slogan, Ridcully-style (Terry Pratchett, The Last Continent, Discworld)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Prakesh's Star Trek Site


 


Posted by Jeff Raven (Member # 20) on :
 
Hey, that's First of Two's line!

------------------
"If a nail is driven into the wrong place, it would be foolish indeed to become angry with the hammer." - Old Russian Proverb
 


Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
Indeed it is. We may sue. That's WORSE than assimilation.

Hey, back in college when the campus held their annual (or more often, if there was any crisis on campus) 'heritage and cultural fair,' my main source of pleasure was going to all the booths wearing my Borg T-shirt that said "YOUR CULTURE WILL BE ASSIMILATED." Which was my response to most questions put to me.
"Your primitive culture is unable to resist us." "You will adapt to service us." "Diversity is irrelevant."

Needless to say, I wasn't all that popular.

------------------
"Nobody knows this, but I'm scared all the time... of what I might do, if I ever let go." -- Michael Garibaldi


 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
Well, since they're trying to prevent the dilution of their culture, I think it's obvious that there won't be any amalgamation any time soon.

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"This spontaneous stuff takes a little bit of planning." - John Flansburgh

 


Posted by Baloo (Member # 5) on :
 
I think Dane's experience with world culture is not so similar to my own. While elements of World (read: American) Culture are adopted worldwide, there is always, in my experience, a great deal of local variation on this theme. They might have McDonald's in Germany and Wendy's in Korea, but they also have their traditional restaurants and cuisine. Clothing styles of the west might be adopted in the east, and American music styles in various corners of the world, it signifies nothing more than people choosing aspects of another culture that complement their own.

If a "world culture" ever develops, it will be a heterogenous admixture of world-wide similarities and local differences. The fact that people all over the world wear Nike shoes or eat (occasionally) at McDonald's is not indicative of anything more than marketing success.

If there is any aspect of world culture that appeals to me, it is the possibility that we will discover more to draw us together than drives us apart.

--Baloo

------------------
"Sometimes "dark" is just a way of saying you�ve nothing to add, only a new way to subtract."

--James Lileks
http://www.geocities.com/cyrano_jones.geo/



 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
And, of course, there's most likely a significant portion of the world's population that won't want to be united under the banner of the McDonalds Corporation.

The big problem with the "cultural amalgamation" thing is that it doesn't take into account all the stuff that people value more than hamburgers than shoes, such as relgion, the amount of power government should have, and so on.

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"This spontaneous stuff takes a little bit of planning." - John Flansburgh

 


Posted by Dane Simri (Member # 272) on :
 
Excellent points, one and all.

Baloo, I think you may be misinterpreting me somewhat. The popularity of McDonalds in Russia is indicative of cultural amalgamation, but no more or less so than the existance of Chinese restaurants in Brazil or Italian restaurants in Saudi Arabia. The popularity of country music in France is inticative, but no more or less so than the popularity of techno (which has its roots in Germany) in the USA. My point is that, as "people choose aspects of another culture that complement their own," they drive the heterogeneous toward the homogeneous. I think the analogy of gaseous diffusion is a good one for my feelings on the subject. (In other words, I'm not trying to equate American culture with the Borg here!)

Frank, I think that the trend toward amalgamation is proven out all the more by "all the stuff that people value more than hamburgers." I offer the recent series of reconciliation moves between the Lutheran and Catholic churches as an example. Or how about the much-aligned Euro? (By the way, isn't it interesting how the Euro hovers so close to the value of the US dollar?)

I suppose this discussion would be made clearer if we could come up with a definition of culture. My dictionary offers: "The totality of socially transmitted behavior patterns, arts, beliefs, institutions, and all other products of human work and thought." But what does culture include? Off the top of my head:

Language
The Arts
Music
Drama/Theater
Graphic Arts
Literature
Etiquitte/Customs
Civil and Fiscal Government
Religion/Spirituality
Science/Technology

I think it's possible to measure roughly the degree to which each of these items has become more (or less) globally homogeneous over the last, say, 200 years. In my opinion, the trend is toward homogeneity. Now, I'm sure that there are other things that could be added to this list, but do they support the "sustainment of many static cultures" theory?

Thanks for helping me sort out my opinions on this!

------------------
Dane

"Mathematicians have long held that a million monkeys banging on a million keyboards would eventually reproduce the collected wisdom of the human race. Now, thanks to the internet, we know this is not true." -- Robert Silensky
 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
The difference between Lutherans and Catholic is pretty irrelevent...I challenge a non-Moslem here to name the two Moslem types, using proper spelling.

The Euro is actually steadily dropping below the value of the dollar.

Language - I wish I lived in Finland or something so I could bash the English language more. About the only country that could benefit from using English is France, and that's not going to happen any time soon (at least, not over the dead bodies over the French). In 50 years I'll bet English will decompose into something completely unusable. I'd personally much rather speak Esperanto or Hungarian or Quenya or anything else...

The Arts - I'll let someone else field this one.

Music - Video game sountracks are popular in Japan, but I think I'm the only one here who bought the Donkey Kong Country CD.

Drama/Theater - If movies count, I've heard that India generally produces hundreds and hundreds of films each year, whereas in the US movies are big-budget-type things.

Graphic Arts - Er...you mean, billboards and such? Or just paintings?

Literature - Since this depends on language, it's already very different. I challenge someone here to write anything without using the progressive tense, even though most non-English literature gets along fine without it.

Etiquette/Customs - Almost all countries differ in this regard.

Government - Ha! Everyone in the US complains when the government does anything, but that doesn't happen in many places.

Religion/Spirituality - As I mentioned, religion is a major component in the lives of many, and there's many different relgious views around.

Science/Technology - Look at all the research and development that goes into cars in the US, and then try to find a Ford Taurus in Europe. I can tell you that there aren't any in Italy.

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"This spontaneous stuff takes a little bit of planning." - John Flansburgh

 


Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
Shiite and Sunni?

------------------
"Nobody knows this, but I'm scared all the time... of what I might do, if I ever let go." -- Michael Garibaldi


 


Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
As to Ford... Yes, but why bother marketing an American car in Europe, when you already OWN parts or all of several European carmakers? (I'm thinking VW, Aston Martin, etc.)

------------------
"Nobody knows this, but I'm scared all the time... of what I might do, if I ever let go." -- Michael Garibaldi


 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
Close...Shi'ite.

Well, most people can't afford an Aston-Martin. Does GM own any European car companies? (I think there's one called Opal or something like that.) Of course, then there's Diamler-Chrysler...let's talk about something besides cars in Europe.

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"This spontaneous stuff takes a little bit of planning." - John Flansburgh

 


Posted by Baloo (Member # 5) on :
 
That's Opel! Australia has Holden and Britain has Vauxhall.

------------------
"Lassie, her ears pricked up!"

--Atoth the Tamarian [From "Star Trek: Door Repair Guy"]
http://www.geocities.com/cyrano_jones.geo/


 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
I can never resist item by item posts!

Language: If you'd like to quit speaking English, Frank, I think you'd find a large group of people who would be more than willing to fund the experiment.

Music: The 20th century has been one long exercise in amalgamation musically. How else to explain clubs in Thailand playing trance music made in Germany inspired by Duke Ellington records?

Drama: Uh...you do realize that there are more than ten movies made in North America a year?

Science/Technology: This is probably the most global field listed on the, uh, list.

------------------
"What did it mean to fly? A tremor in your soul. To resist the dull insistance of gravity."
--
Camper Van Beethoven

 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
Sol: Ie dero nibamo horximo, duifix so qeicaqa cen...

[Edit note: it turns out that this should have been shorter in the first place]

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"This spontaneous stuff takes a little bit of planning." - John Flansburgh

[This message has been edited by The Shadow (edited March 17, 2000).]
 


Posted by Curry Monster (Member # 12) on :
 
I see what Sol means about 'culture' relating to modern entertainment. I can give you the example of India, which yearly at 'bollywood' (read Bombays hollywood) produces more moveis that its US counterpart. Similarily the Indian music industry churns out more music, they have the advantage of a consolidated market of a billion people to be sure, but they have borrowed strongly from the US when it comes to 90's cinema and music styles. Even though this borrowing has occured the music produced there could never be confused for the US type as the Indians use tradition instruments and language as well as US inputs.

The other thing I've always found hard to come to terms with is the style of cinema and music differ so greatly that if you ask the average Indian to watch a US made movie, they'll sit through it and have a pretty much one word reaction to it. "Crap". Similarily you'll find that an American will react the same way to Bollywood. The styles are just so different it ain't funny. Diversity isn't dead. It's just technologising.

------------------
"Blind faith is the crutch of fools"


 


Posted by Simon on :
 
I would diagree about science becoming so global. I've recently been reading about the lengths western nations go to in an effort to prevent developing nations from gaining our technology.
 
Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Don't confuse science with its applications. Even during the height of the cold war, western scientists would meet with their Russian counterparts to explore the latest theories regarding stuff. Now, this could hardly be called a free-for-all, but it illustrates that science tends to be an inclusive activity.

------------------
"What did it mean to fly? A tremor in your soul. To resist the dull insistance of gravity."
--
Camper Van Beethoven

 


Posted by Jeff Raven (Member # 20) on :
 
I'll agree with Sol. Science is pretty open around the world, but technology is pretty limited.

Most scientists aren't interested in patenting their ideas but rather sharing them.

------------------
"If a nail is driven into the wrong place, it would be foolish indeed to become angry with the hammer." - Old Russian Proverb
 


Posted by Curry Monster (Member # 12) on :
 
Companies want patents. They equal money

------------------
"Blind faith is the crutch of fools"


 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Though the line between the two can get fuzzy at times.

------------------
"What did it mean to fly? A tremor in your soul. To resist the dull insistance of gravity."
--
Camper Van Beethoven

 


Posted by Curry Monster (Member # 12) on :
 
I just love it how transnationals use patents to destroy their competition. As if they invented a herbal cure that has been used for 4000 years. But hell, they turn it into a tablet, patent it, and then sue the pants off of anyone who decides to get it from a source other than them.

------------------
"Blind faith is the crutch of fools"


 


Posted by Orion Syndicate (Member # 25) on :
 
Diversity isn't dead and there's no reason diversity should die or be allowed to die. One of our greatest assets on this Earth is our diversity. What we need now is to learn to accept these differences and carry on with life, and not rubbishing other peoples beliefs all the time.

With regards to the sermon, if he really did say that (I've found it hard to trust the western press these last few years with regards to Islamic matters), then I completely disagree with him. Making a speech like that merely leads to more hatred and mistrust. I have no problem with anyone trying to preserve their own culture, but to promote hatred is wrong. I say this as a Muslim and one of the poeple to whom this message was no doubt directed.

------------------
Patriotism is the virtue of the vicious.


 


Posted by Dane Simri (Member # 272) on :
 
I have never claimed cultural diversity to be "dead." I am currently claiming that cultural diversity WILL BE dead in the relatively near future (let's say within 200 years). That is the trend of the last 500 years, and I see no evidence that it will not continue, various and sundry jihads notwithstanding.

To this point, posters to this thread have offered some excellent evidence that the world is CURRENTLY a diverse place. I agree that it is. Only Frank has offered any evidence against the trend toward cultural homogeneity.

------------------
Dane

"Mathematicians have long held that a million monkeys banging on a million keyboards would eventually reproduce the collected wisdom of the human race. Now, thanks to the internet, we know this is not true." -- Robert Silensky
 


Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
I recently heard someone say that as war becomes less palatable, diversity will become less important.

I think he was confusing nationalism with diversity, though.

------------------
"Nobody knows this, but I'm scared all the time... of what I might do, if I ever let go." -- Michael Garibaldi


 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Oh, I have to disagree with that, Dane. The reasons behind the differences in our culture are changing, and changing for the better in my opinion, but there will be new reasons. And its a damn good thing at that, as a completely homogenic culture deprives itself of the ability to evolve.

What I see happening, from my admittedly untrained point of view, is a decline in the more superficial aspects of diversity, while the real meat of cultural exchange, the sharing of ideas, will be given a playing field the likes of which has never before been seen. This isn't really anything new, as humanity has always been moving towards more and more complex interactions. City-dwellers can think of and do things that nomads can't. Nation-states, empires...the course of human history can in some ways be viewed as an ever expanding network.

------------------
"What did it mean to fly? A tremor in your soul. To resist the dull insistance of gravity."
--
Camper Van Beethoven

 


Posted by Dane Simri (Member # 272) on :
 
First, I would agree that nationalism and cultural distinction shouldn't be confused. Is there a transnational equivalent to nationalism that we might refer to as "culturalism," the devotion to the interests of a particular culture or the belief that cultures benefit from acting independently rather than collectively, emphasizing cultural rather than planetary goals?

Sol, help me understand what you mean:
- What were the reasons behind the differences in cultures, and how are those reasons changing?
- Can you offer evidence that "a completely homogenic culture deprives itself of the ability to evolve?"
- Which aspects of diversity would you classify as "superficial?"

Please keep in mind that I am NOT advocating the amalgamation of all human cultures into a single Human Culture. I am merely postulating that such an amalgamation is underway and furthermore is inevitable, barring some massive technological reversion.

------------------
Dane

"Mathematicians have long held that a million monkeys banging on a million keyboards would eventually reproduce the collected wisdom of the human race. Now, thanks to the internet, we know this is not true." -- Robert Silensky
 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
A culture will die when perfectly homogenous because it cannot adapt to new situations. So, either the culture hits something it can't handle, or, far more likely, in that ocean of sameness one person has a new idea which overthrows the whole system, erecting a new one in its place. In either case, the culture is altered or destroyed.

As for the rest of it, I'm unclear on what you want me to explain. Technology tends on the whole to place emphasis on the inherint value of ideas as opposed to their origin. Hence, the old ways of dealing with such cultural differences must be altered as well. For example, Bob Steves can write a book and have it printed on that wacky Gutenburg's device, and I can be exposed to ideas without ever meeting him; an event that might have put a quick halt to my acceptance of his idea due to traditional prejudices. And by this I don't mean sexual or racial ones, specifically, but simply the fact that I am, in a pre-print era, very unlikely to be exposed to information from a great distance away, or from a group different enough from my own. Fast forward a few centuries, and Bob's decendant Steve Steves starts a webpage. The same concept applies, though multiplied by several degrees of simplicity.

In other words, I see a trend seperating the superficial notions we attach to ideas and the ideas themselves, and I cannot help but consider this a good thing.

Or let me give another example. I'm *grunt* and you're *double-grunt*. We have no language, and so our minds are seperated by a gulf that is nearly total. Later, my great times X grandchild and yours, Oog and Badug, meet each other hunting and share a few words over the desirability of local hunting grounds. Ideas are shared. But the scale is limited, because we have a very small radius in which to spread them. So history continues, and people start to gather in villages, and trade with other villages, and build cities, and then comes that next leap in idea technology: the road. Now our ideas can spread over a much larger area. However, since I am not likely to build a nice wide road between my front door and the Rampaging Horde, we've still got some major walls to scale. Extend this to the present day and you see the scope of our ability to share ideas has expanded from *grunt*'s...well, grunts, to Frank's very own web domain. And there is every indication that the trend will continue.

You could almost put it in terms of Hegel's theory of the Absolute, if you were a geekish philosophy student. However, I think we can spare each other that particular "joy".

To sum up, ideas can do more good (And to be fair, more bad, or at least on greater scales.) when the ideas flow as freely as possible.

But I fear I've gotten off track a bit.

------------------
"What did it mean to fly? A tremor in your soul. To resist the dull insistance of gravity."
--
Camper Van Beethoven

 


Posted by Dane Simri (Member # 272) on :
 
(Sorry, I've been busy for a few days.)

Your ideas on the dissemenation of ideas are interesting, Sol, and I won't refute them. But can you offer proof of your first premise, namely that "a culture will die when perfectly homogenous because it cannot adapt to new situations?" What is there in homogeneity that precludes adaptability?

------------------
Dane

"Mathematicians have long held that a million monkeys banging on a million keyboards would eventually reproduce the collected wisdom of the human race. Now, thanks to the internet, we know this is not true." -- Robert Silensky
 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
It's all about adaptability. You've got a culture that learns how to bend in one direction and only one direction to great success. Which is fine, for a time. But when trends change, the culture finds itself bending in a way it hasn't trained itself to bend. And so it breaks.

------------------
"What did it mean to fly? A tremor in your soul. To resist the dull insistance of gravity."
--
Camper Van Beethoven

 


Posted by First of Two (Member # 16) on :
 
Like Imperial Rome?

------------------
"Nobody knows this, but I'm scared all the time... of what I might do, if I ever let go." -- Michael Garibaldi


 


Posted by Dane Simri (Member # 272) on :
 
Sol, I'm still missing your logic. Are you saying that a homogeneous culture can only "bend in one direction?" Maybe if you typed slowly and used small words I'd get it.

First, are you throwing Imperial Rome into the ring as being an example of cultural homogeneity? If so, are you serious?

------------------
Dane

"Mathematicians have long held that a million monkeys banging on a million keyboards would eventually reproduce the collected wisdom of the human race. Now, thanks to the internet, we know this is not true." -- Robert Silensky
 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
Not just culture. Any system that limits itself to one mode of reaction is always at risk of being destroyed when something new happens in the environment.

------------------
"What did it mean to fly? A tremor in your soul. To resist the dull insistance of gravity."
--
Camper Van Beethoven

 


Posted by Dane Simri (Member # 272) on :
 
Oh, so you're saying that a homogeneous culture limits itself to one mode of reaction and is therefore doomed when that single mode fails. I hate to hold you to logic here, but you at some point have to prove that a homogeneous culture would be limited in such a way. To me, it seems that a society unhindered by the prejudices of a plurality of cultures would avail itself of a wider range of possible reactions, not a narrower one.

------------------
Dane

"Mathematicians have long held that a million monkeys banging on a million keyboards would eventually reproduce the collected wisdom of the human race. Now, thanks to the internet, we know this is not true." -- Robert Silensky
 


Posted by Aethelwer (Member # 36) on :
 
Where are those different reactions going to come from, if everyone is forced to act the same with no alternative?

------------------
Frank's Home Page
"Bah! Screw Alaska!" - TSN
 


Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
By definition, a homogenous culture only has one set of reactions to choose from.

You aren't talking about an homogenous culture, however, but one where the differences aren't based on things that we might call petty, such as birth place or skin color.

------------------
"What did it mean to fly? A tremor in your soul. To resist the dull insistance of gravity."
--
Camper Van Beethoven

 




© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3