Surprised this hasn't come up here yet. Safely sitting on an American webserver, we may all freely say what's blatantly obvious at this point, free from royal censure.
So, is he a man who LIKES TEH OHTER MEN?!?! Is this all baseless crap? Is Clarence House turning out to be like that Steel Mill on The Simpsons?
Posted by Ritten (Member # 417) on :
Well, if it matters to Mike then I'll worry...
Posted by Phoenix (Member # 966) on :
It's baseless crap.
Posted by Peregrinus (Member # 504) on :
I don't care. I'm hoping E2R holds on long enough for succession to skip Charlie and go straight to Wills. Woot.
--Jonah
Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :
Well, Bonny Prince Charlie has been dead a couple hundred years, anyway, so does it matter anymore?
No, really, I understand what we're talking about, but... what are we talking about? This is the first I've heard of it, and it's not worth looking up on my own.
Posted by Jason Abbadon (Member # 882) on :
You guys still have royalty? For what purpose, exactly?
Posted by Ritten (Member # 417) on :
Tradition.....
Posted by Jason Abbadon (Member # 882) on :
What is that again? Like Halloween?
Posted by Wraith (Member # 779) on :
Well, bearing in mind that a)the guy who's making the allegations has done this sort of thing before and it's turned out to be bollocks and b) Charles has been bonking Camilla for God knows how long, I'm pretty sure it's baseless crap.
The purpose of Royalty is slightly more difficult; the Queen is the head of state and is politically neutral, as the state and head of state should be. and yes, tradition.
Posted by Ritten (Member # 417) on :
Royal Decrees not being what they used to be.... Except in the making of Sirs and Knights....
Posted by Grokca (Member # 722) on :
quote:b) Charles has been bonking Camilla for God knows how long, I'm pretty sure it's baseless crap.
In a dark corridor it is not hard to mistake Camilla for a man, perhaps it was just a harmless mistake.
Posted by Wraith (Member # 779) on :
Quite possibly.
Posted by Cartman (Member # 256) on :
"In a dark corridor..."
Or in a brightly lit one.
Posted by Ritten (Member # 417) on :
I'll flip the coin...
Posted by Guardian 2000 (Member # 743) on :
So that's what the hush-hush fuss is about? Charles likes the cock?
Well whooptee-doo . . . what's all this about it bringing down the royal family, then? I mean, sure, going down on a dude would, by default, bring a certain part of the royal family to his knees, but still.
See, I thought it was going to be something good, like illegitimate children or royal frat parties with gangbangs or something. This "Charles l1k35 t3h bUt1-s3ChS" is almost disappointing.
Posted by Ritten (Member # 417) on :
I dunno, wait for the stories of the Royal Man Trains comes out....
Posted by Wraith (Member # 779) on :
This is tame compared to the stuff from, well, pretty much any previous monarch.
Posted by Jason Abbadon (Member # 882) on :
If you're concerned about him appearing gay, you should probably stop calling him "Bonnie".
...at least in public.
Posted by Austin Powers (Member # 250) on :
But we're hardly public, are we? We're a tiny dark corner of the web that no one wants to notice for fear of being called a geek... Posted by Jason Abbadon (Member # 882) on :
Even now, dark forces are monitoring our conversations and updating their dossiers on all of us. They're building a case for Herr Ashcroft.
Posted by Ritten (Member # 417) on :
They got a good thick one on me....
They should roll it and smoke it....
Posted by MaGiC (Member # 59) on :
god...been ages sice i've come across a good thick one....*sigh*
But back to Charles....
Posted by Jason Abbadon (Member # 882) on :
Well then, come on down to Fort Lauderdale...and bring LOA with you.
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)