quote:9/11 Commission Finds Ties Between al-Qaeda and Iran
Senior U.S. officials have told TIME that the 9/11 Commission's report will cite evidence suggesting that the 9/11 hijackers had previously passed through Iran
Friday, Jul. 16, 2004
Next week's much anticipated final report by a bipartisan commission on the origins of the 9/11 attacks will contain new evidence of contacts between al-Qaeda and Iran�just weeks after the Administration has come under fire for overstating its claims of contacts between al-Qaeda and Saddam Hussein's Iraq.
A senior U.S. official told TIME that the Commission has uncovered evidence suggesting that between eight and ten of the 14 "muscle" hijackers�that is, those involved in gaining control of the four 9/11 aircraft and subduing the crew and passengers�passed through Iran in the period from October 2000 to February 2001. Sources also tell TIME that Commission investigators found that Iran had a history of allowing al-Qaeda members to enter and exit Iran across the Afghan border. This practice dated back to October 2000, with Iranian officials issuing specific instructions to their border guards�in some cases not to put stamps in the passports of al-Qaeda personnel�and otherwise not harass them and to facilitate their travel across the frontier. The report does not, however, offer evidence that Iran was aware of the plans for the 9/11 attacks.
The senior official also told TIME that the report will note that Iranian officials approached the al-Qaeda leadership after the bombing of the USS Cole and proposed a collaborative relationship in future attacks on the U.S., but the offer was turned down by bin Laden because he did not want to alienate his supporters in Saudi Arabia.
The Iran-al Qaeda contacts were discovered and presented to the Commissioners near the end of the bipartisan panel's more than year-long investigation into the sources and origins of the 9/11 attacks. Much of the new information about Iran came from al-Qaeda detainees interrogated by the U.S. government, including captured Yemeni al-Qaeda operative Waleed Mohammed bin Attash, who organized the October 2000 attack on the USS Cole, and from as many as 100 separate electronic intelligence intercepts culled by analysts at the NSA. The findings were sent to the White House for review only this week. But Commission members have been hinting for weeks that their report would have some Iran surprises. As the 9/11 Commission's chairman, Thomas Kean, said in June, "We believe....that there were a lot more active contacts, frankly, with Iran and with Pakistan than there were with Iraq."
These findings follow a Commission staff report, released in June, which suggested that al-Qaeda may have collaborated with Hezbollah and its Iranian sponsors in the 1996 bombing of the Khobar Towers, a key American military barracks in Saudi Arabia. Previously, the attack had been attributed only to Hezbollah, with Iranian support. A U.S. indictment of bin Laden filed in 1998 for the bombing of U.S. embassies in Africa said al-Qaeda "forged alliances . . . with the government of Iran and its associated terrorist group Hezbollah for the purpose of working together against their perceived common enemies in the West, particularly the United States." But the Commission comes to no firm conclusion on al-Qaeda's involvement in the Khobar disaster.
Since 9/11 the U.S. has held direct talks with Iran�and through intermediaries including Britain, Switzerland and Saudi Arabia�concerning the fate of scores of al-Qaeda that Iran has acknowleded are in the country, including an unspecified number of senior leaders, whom one senior U.S. official called al-Qaeda's "management council". The U.S. as well as the Saudis have unsuccessfully sought the repatriation of this group, which is widely thought to include Saad bin Laden, the son of Osama bin Laden, as well of other key al-Qaeda figures.
quote:Why have we been dinking around in Iraq when it is the Iranian government that has an ongoing "operational relationship" with Al Qaeda?
The first principle of any real War on Terror is that governments that sponsor/assist/aid terrorist organizations assume their rightful share of responsibility for their actions, and must accept that responsibility: apologies, reparations, and aid in stamping out the organization, at a minimum.
Iraq apparently has ties not only with Al Qaeda but also with the 9/11 hijackers. And Iran appears to be developing its nuclear capacity. See Iran's Nuclear Program: Recent Developments (pdf) from the Updated March 4, 2004 CRS Report for Congress.
So, I guess that were we to follow through with the Bush Doctrine�, we need to turn those divisions already in Iraq Eastward.
But then the Iraq invasion was wasn't really about that was it.
Posted by Jason Abbadon (Member # 882) on :
Next on the American invasion: Iran! Anything to distract from Saudi Arabi's involvment. Posted by Saltah'na (Member # 33) on :
Does Iran have oil?
Posted by Jason Abbadon (Member # 882) on :
It does'nt need oil: it has arabs!
Posted by Nim the Merciful (Member # 205) on :
Arabs and strife.
Posted by Jason Abbadon (Member # 882) on :
Oh my!
Posted by Veers (Member # 661) on :
Actually, Iran isn't an Arab country. Unless that is supposed to be part of your satire...
Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
IRONY.
Posted by Jason Abbadon (Member # 882) on :
quote:Originally posted by Veers: Actually, Iran isn't an Arab country. Unless that is supposed to be part of your satire...
Yes, but does Bush know (or care) about that?
Posted by Saltah'na (Member # 33) on :
As long as it has oil, then it doesn't matter.
Posted by TSN (Member # 31) on :